IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5590-d1104409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Urban Solution for New Faculty Facilities within Spatial Historical and Cultural Units—A Case Study of Belgrade, Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Nataša Danilović Hristić

    (Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Marija Lalošević

    (Institute of Urban Planning of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nebojša Stefanović

    (Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The focus of this study is buildings for public purposes, specifically for higher education, planned in zones of spatial cultural-historical units. Sustainable urban planning in areas with cultural-historical heritage is a particular challenge since the higher education facilities themselves have their own functional requirements, which are much easier to fulfill in “softer” locations. The research objective is to prove the hypothesis that it is possible to indicate a prescription for the practical application of the theoretical model and define the necessary steps to achieve the best sustainable quality results in practice. The paper analyses the associated process, relational settings, circumstances, participants, and timelines, and it presents the results of final designs based on two parallel case studies of new capital buildings for the University of Belgrade. Methodologically it gives an overview of the context, referring to other research and examples, detailing chosen case studies, and describing their backgrounds, conditions and requirements, frameworks, chronologies, approaches, and results. The discussion concludes with theoretical models originating from the comparison of implemented steps in the process of creation and evaluation of architectural ideas and summarized similarities and differences, aiming that there is a common model suitable for further applications. The practical result of the research is findings about the pathway for the best original planning solution emphasized through the institution of urban architectural competitions as a mandatory step, recommending wider participation of experts in the process of evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataša Danilović Hristić & Marija Lalošević & Nebojša Stefanović, 2023. "Implementation of Urban Solution for New Faculty Facilities within Spatial Historical and Cultural Units—A Case Study of Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5590-:d:1104409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joks Janssen & Eric Luiten & Hans Renes & Eva Stegmeijer, 2017. "Heritage as sector, factor and vector: conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1654-1672, September.
    2. Helene Simoni & Eleni Georgoudaki, 2020. "The University of Patras, Greece, its city, and international students: insights from multiple cartographic perspectives," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 213-233, February.
    3. Michael Hebbert, 2018. "The campus and the city: a design revolution explained," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 883-897, November.
    4. Shehu Muhammad & Maimunah Sapri & Ibrahim Sipan, 2014. "Academic Buildings and Their Influence on Students’ Wellbeing in Higher Education Institutions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 1159-1178, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wojciech Bal & Magdalena Czalczynska-Podolska & Maja Nieścior, 2023. "The Importance of Architectural Icons of the City of Szczecin for the Transformation of Landscape Identity and Promotion of the City’s Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-37, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viola Fabi & Maria Pilar Vettori & Emilio Faroldi, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse Practices and Sustainable Urban Development: Perspectives of Innovation for European Historic Spa Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Salvatore Di Fazio & Giuseppe Modica, 2018. "Historic Rural Landscapes: Sustainable Planning Strategies and Action Criteria. The Italian Experience in the Global and European Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Yavuz Alkan, 2023. "Assessment of sustainable green campus in terms of students with disabilities and landscaping: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11367-11395, October.
    4. Mona Ali & Youngmin Kim, 2020. "Can a University Campus Work as a Public Space in the Metropolis of a Developing Country? The Case of Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Paul Barratt & Ruth Swetnam, 2022. "A civic and sustainable 15-minute campus? Universities should embrace the 15-minute city concept to help create vibrant sustainable communities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 37(8), pages 734-744, December.
    6. Mladen Obad Šćitaroci & Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, 2019. "Heritage Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, May.
    7. Susanne Fredholm & Maitri Dore & Sara Brorström, 2021. "Strategic Responses to Wicked Problems of Heritage Management: Experiences from the West Link Infrastructure Project in Gothenburg, Sweden," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Wei Guo & Da-Fang Wu & Yue Li & Feng-Xi Wang & Yong-Qi Ye & Hua-Wei Lin & Chi-Fang Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Popular Science Tourism Sites in University Towns: Case Study of Guangzhou University Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Markuszewska Iwona, 2019. "Sentimentality versus transformation of the historical traditional rural landscape (a case study: the landscape of Dutch law settlement in Poland)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 53-70, March.
    10. Teresa Cunha Ferreira & Julia Rey-Pérez & Ana Pereira Roders & Ana Tarrafa Silva & Isabel Coimbra & Isabel Breda Vazquez, 2023. "The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Governance of World Heritage in Urban Contexts: Reflections from Three European Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Ana Tarrafa Silva & Ana Pereira Roders & Teresa Cunha Ferreira & Ivan Nevzgodin, 2023. "Critical Analysis of Policy Integration Degrees between Heritage Conservation and Spatial Planning in Amsterdam and Ballarat," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Erin Seekamp & Eugene Jo, 2020. "Resilience and transformation of heritage sites to accommodate for loss and learning in a changing climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 41-55, September.
    13. Despina Dimelli & Areti Kotsoni, 2023. "The Reconstruction of Post-War Cities—Proposing Integrated Conservation Plans for Aleppo’s Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Christer Gustafsson & Elisabetta Lazzaro, 2021. "The Innovative Response of Cultural and Creative Industries to Major European Societal Challenges: Toward a Knowledge and Competence Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Sandra Fatorić & Robbert Biesbroek, 2020. "Adapting cultural heritage to climate change impacts in the Netherlands: barriers, interdependencies, and strategies for overcoming them," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 301-320, September.
    16. Mohammed Ahmed M.S. & Ukai Tetsuya, 2022. "University campuses as agents for urban change," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 22-37, March.
    17. Nan Bai & Pirouz Nourian & Ana Pereira Roders & Raoul Bunschoten & Weixin Huang & Lu Wang, 2023. "Investigating rural public spaces with cultural significance using morphological, cognitive and behavioural data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 94-116, January.
    18. Linde Egberts & Hans Renes, 2020. "A Local Heritage and Climate Nexus: The Past in Planning for Climate Change on the Dutch island of Goeree‐overflakkee," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(5), pages 771-785, December.
    19. Jermina Stanojev & Christer Gustafsson, 2021. "Smart Specialisation Strategies for Elevating Integration of Cultural Heritage into Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5590-:d:1104409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.