IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v37y2022i8p734-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A civic and sustainable 15-minute campus? Universities should embrace the 15-minute city concept to help create vibrant sustainable communities

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Barratt
  • Ruth Swetnam

Abstract

This article looks at the value of applying the 15-minute city concept to city-based university campuses. We argue that attention to the public realm within and beyond university campuses has the potential to reduce carbon emissions, enhance civic engagement and improve the vibrancy and liveability of cities. The 15-minute approach addresses aspects of poverty and inequality through the relative affordability of sustainable travel and access to affordable goods and services. To realise these benefits universities must focus on three areas; (1) Establishing porous campus boundaries where services can be shared with the local community and vice-versa. (2) Playing an active role in evaluating and improving the sustainability and liveability of the area surrounding the campus. (3) Promoting, enhancing and enabling high-quality public transport and active travel networks to reduce reliance on private vehicles. The 15-minute campus approach marks a change from the idea of a ‘sticky campus’ where the university is seen as an enclosed one-stop resource for staff and students – often set apart and secured from its host city. Our notion of a 15-minute campus is a more civic minded conception that promotes an awareness of what lies both within and beyond the confines of the campus, challenging the definition of what the university is, and who it is for.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Barratt & Ruth Swetnam, 2022. "A civic and sustainable 15-minute campus? Universities should embrace the 15-minute city concept to help create vibrant sustainable communities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 37(8), pages 734-744, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:37:y:2022:i:8:p:734-744
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942231175096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942231175096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942231175096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hebbert, 2018. "The campus and the city: a design revolution explained," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 883-897, November.
    2. Georgia Pozoukidou & Zoi Chatziyiannaki, 2021. "15-Minute City: Decomposing the New Urban Planning Eutopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Mona Ali & Youngmin Kim, 2020. "Can a University Campus Work as a Public Space in the Metropolis of a Developing Country? The Case of Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Joanna Jaroszewicz & Anna Majewska, 2021. "Group Spatial Preferences of Residential Locations—Simplified Method Based on Crowdsourced Spatial Data and MCDA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    5. Liang Wen & Dora Marinova & Jeffrey Kenworthy & Xiumei Guo, 2022. "Street Recovery in the Age of COVID-19: Simultaneous Design for Mobility, Customer Traffic and Physical Distancing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Nataša Danilović Hristić & Marija Lalošević & Nebojša Stefanović, 2023. "Implementation of Urban Solution for New Faculty Facilities within Spatial Historical and Cultural Units—A Case Study of Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Silvio Cristiano & Samuele Zilio, 2021. "Whose Health in Whose City? A Systems Thinking Approach to Support and Evaluate Plans, Policies, and Strategies for Lasting Urban Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Elena Marchigiani & Bertrando Bonfantini, 2022. "Urban Transition and the Return of Neighbourhood Planning. Questioning the Proximity Syndrome and the 15-Minute City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Himanshu Grover, 2023. "Public risk perception of covid-19 transmission and support for compact development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Ya Yang & Zhengyu Jiang & Yawei Hou & Huaxing Wang & Zeyu Wang, 2023. "Healthy City Community Space-Oriented Structural Planning and Management Optimization under COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Wei Guo & Da-Fang Wu & Yue Li & Feng-Xi Wang & Yong-Qi Ye & Hua-Wei Lin & Chi-Fang Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Popular Science Tourism Sites in University Towns: Case Study of Guangzhou University Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Ebba Lisberg Jensen & Johanna Alkan Olsson & Ebba Malmqvist, 2023. "Growing Inwards: Densification and Ecosystem Services in Comprehensive Plans from Three Municipalities in Southern Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Aura Bertoni & Paola Dubini & Alberto Monti, 2021. "Bringing Back in the Spatial Dimension in the Assessment of Cultural and Creative Industries and Its Relationship with a City’s Sustainability: The Case of Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Irene Manzini Ceinar & Ilaria Mariotti, 2021. "Teleworking In Post-Pandemic Times:May Local Coworking Spaces Be The Future Trend?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 52-76, JUNE.
    15. Fabio Borghetti & Cristian Giovanni Colombo & Michela Longo & Renato Mazzoncini & Leonardo Cesarini & Luigi Contestabile & Claudio Somaschini, 2021. "15-Min Station: A Case Study in North Italy City to Evaluate the Livability of an Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Alba Ramírez Saiz & Andrea Alonso & Delfín Jiménez Martín & Patxi Lamíquiz, 2022. "Can Proximal Environments Prevent Social Inequalities Amongst People of All Ages and Abilities? An Integrative Literature Review Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-31, October.
    17. Olivera Lekić Glavan & Nenad Nikolić & Branislav Folić & Biljana Vitošević & Aleksandra Mitrović & Saja Kosanović, 2022. "COVID-19 and City Space: Impact and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Kangwei Tu & Andras Reith, 2023. "Changes in Urban Planning in Response to Pandemics: A Comparative Review from H1N1 to COVID-19 (2009–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Yidan Cao & Xiaomin Tang, 2022. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Community Public Open Space Renewal: A Case Study of the Ruijin Community, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Mohammed Ahmed M.S. & Ukai Tetsuya, 2022. "University campuses as agents for urban change," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 22-37, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:37:y:2022:i:8:p:734-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.