IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v195y2025ics0965856425000576.html

Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Rahman, Fabiha
  • Oliver, Robert
  • Buehler, Ralph
  • Lee, Jinhyung
  • Crawford, Thomas
  • Kim, Junghwan

Abstract

The 15-minute city (15-MC) concept, which is gaining attention among urban planners and researchers worldwide, focuses on strategically placing essential amenities within 15-minute walking or biking distances. When evaluating cities’ existing 15-MC accessibility or other variants of chrono-urbanism, previous studies have largely relied on open-source datasets, such as OpenStreetMap (OSM), which are often criticized for their limited point of interest (POI) data quality. This raises concerns about unreliable evaluations of 15-MC accessibility. Using geospatial analysis methods to calculate 15-MC accessibility scores in six differently-sized regions in Virginia, United States, this study empirically compares OSM’s point datasets with its less contentious alternative, Google Maps data. In four of our study areas, the average 15-MC accessibility scores obtained from the OSM’s point-based POI data were significantly lower than those obtained from Google POI data. Furthermore, the results show that the overall inequality (measured by Gini indices) deviates from the standard range of Google-based values when the OSM’s point-based POI data is used. These findings raise methodological concerns regarding the inadequate representation of the real world due to the limitations of OSM’s point-based POI data, which may lead to flawed assessments of 15-MC accessibility scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahman, Fabiha & Oliver, Robert & Buehler, Ralph & Lee, Jinhyung & Crawford, Thomas & Kim, Junghwan, 2025. "Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000576
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000576
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuqi Miao & Tinghao Li & Lili Zheng & Bowen Tan & Qianjun Ma, 2023. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Walking Speed Based on Natural Field Data: Considering the Attributes of Travelers and the Travel Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Eduardo Graells-Garrido & Feliu Serra-Burriel & Francisco Rowe & Fernando M Cucchietti & Patricio Reyes, 2021. "A city of cities: Measuring how 15-minutes urban accessibility shapes human mobility in Barcelona," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Burke, Jeremy & Gras Alomà, Ramon & Yu, Fernando & Kruguer, Jordan, 2022. "Geospatial analysis framework for evaluating urban design typologies in relation with the 15-minute city standards," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 651-667.
    4. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    5. Gehendra Mahara & Chao Wang & Kun Yang & Sipeng Chen & Jin Guo & Qi Gao & Wei Wang & Quanyi Wang & Xiuhua Guo, 2016. "The Association between Environmental Factors and Scarlet Fever Incidence in Beijing Region: Using GIS and Spatial Regression Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Georgia Pozoukidou & Zoi Chatziyiannaki, 2021. "15-Minute City: Decomposing the New Urban Planning Eutopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Pascal Neis & Dennis Zielstra, 2014. "Recent Developments and Future Trends in Volunteered Geographic Information Research: The Case of OpenStreetMap," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-31, January.
    8. David Bell & Mark Jayne, 2009. "Small Cities? Towards a Research Agenda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 683-699, September.
    9. Denise Capasso Da Silva & David A. King & Shea Lemar, 2019. "Accessibility in Practice: 20-Minute City as a Sustainability Planning Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Leonardo Nicoletti & Mikhail Sirenko & Trivik Verma, 2023. "Disadvantaged communities have lower access to urban infrastructure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 831-849, March.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:q86sd_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Ayyoob Sharifi & Mohammad Hajian Hossein Abadi & Zahra Moradi, 2023. "From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Kim, Junghwan & Lee, Bumsoo, 2019. "More than travel time: New accessibility index capturing the connectivity of transit services," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 8-18.
    14. Benjamin Herfort & Sven Lautenbach & João Porto de Albuquerque & Jennings Anderson & Alexander Zipf, 2023. "A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and inequalities of global urban building data in OpenStreetMap," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Timur Abbiasov & Cate Heine & Sadegh Sabouri & Arianna Salazar-Miranda & Paolo Santi & Edward Glaeser & Carlo Ratti, 2024. "The 15-minute city quantified using human mobility data," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 445-455, March.
    16. Dong Liu & Mei-Po Kwan & Zihan Kan & Jianying Wang, 2022. "Toward a Healthy Urban Living Environment: Assessing 15-Minute Green-Blue Space Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Iacono, Michael & Krizek, Kevin J. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2010. "Measuring non-motorized accessibility: issues, alternatives, and execution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 133-140.
    18. Willberg, Elias & Fink, Christoph & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2023. "The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    19. Yue Yang & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Minan Yang, 2023. "Walkability Measurement of 15-Minute Community Life Circle in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Kim, Junghwan & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2021. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people's mobility: A longitudinal study of the U.S. from March to September of 2020," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sdoukopoulos, Alexandros & Papadopoulos, Efthymis & Verani, Eleni & Politis, Ioannis, 2024. "Putting theory into practice: A novel methodological framework for assessing cities' compliance with the 15-min city concept," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Profiroiu, Constantin Marius & Constantin, Daniela-Luminița & Profiroiu, Alina Georgiana & Delcea, Camelia & Nica, Ionuț & Ionescu, Ștefan & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian, 2025. "The 15-minute challenge: Evaluating the gaps in accessibility and urban mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Lei Qi & Yong Adilah Shamsul Harumain & Melasutra Md Dali, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Livable Neighborhood Life Circle and Its Prospects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Zhang, Shanqi & Hu, Zhuomin & Zhen, Feng & Kong, Yu & Tong, Ziyu, 2025. "Assessing the (in)equality of an x-minute city accounting for human mobility patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Pira, Saeid & Hansson, Lisa, 2025. "Analyzing equity in transport planning using the 15-minute city approach. A case study of Oslo city, Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Najmeh Mozaffaree Pour & Jenni Partanen, 2024. "Planning for the urban future: two-level spatial analysis to discover 15-Minute City potential in urban area and expansion in Tallinn, Estonia," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 777-807, April.
    7. Lorenzo Barbieri & Roberto D’Autilia & Paola Marrone & Ilaria Montella, 2023. "Graph Representation of the 15-Minute City: A Comparison between Rome, London, and Paris," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    9. Soukhov, Anastasia & Ravensbergen, Léa & Dorantes, Lucía Mejía & Páez, Antonio, 2025. "Towards completely caring 15-minute neighbourhoods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Wang, Jianying & Kwan, Mei-Po & Liu, Dong & Liu, Yang & Wang, Yuxia, 2025. "15-minute city beyond the urban core: Lessons from the urban-suburban disparity in PCR accessibility within the X-minute framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Ermagun, Alireza & Janatabadi, Fatemeh & Witlox, Frank, 2025. "Beyond the 15-minute city dichotomy: Time-denominated access to essential services in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Miklós Radics & Panayotis Christidis & Borja Alonso & Luigi dell’Olio, 2024. "The X-Minute City: Analysing Accessibility to Essential Daily Destinations by Active Mobility in Seville," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-36, October.
    13. Maram Ali & Tarig Ali & Rahul Gawai & Ahmed Elaksher, 2023. "Fifteen-, Ten-, or Five Minute City? Walkability to Services Assessment: Case of Dubai, UAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    14. repec:osf:osfxxx:anjd7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Milias, Vasileios & Psyllidis, Achilleas & Bozzon, Alessandro, 2024. "Bridging or separating? Co-accessibility as a measure of potential place-based encounters," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    16. Jin, Tanhua & Wang, Kailai & Xin, Yanan & Shi, Jian & Hong, Ye & Witlox, Frank, 2024. "Is a 15-Minute City Within Reach? Measuring Multimodal Accessibility and Carbon Footprint in 12 Major American Cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Bo-Sin Tang & Kenneth KH Wong & Kenneth SS Tang & Siu Wai Wong, 2021. "Walking accessibility to neighbourhood open space in a multi-level urban environment of Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1340-1356, June.
    18. Amritpal Kaur Khakh & Victoria Fast & Rizwan Shahid, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Primary Healthcare Services by Multimodal Means of Travel: Synthesis and Case Study in the City of Calgary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Robin Lovelace, 2021. "Open source tools for geographic analysis in transport planning," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 547-578, October.
    20. Ronald V Kalafsky & William Graves, 2023. "Global connections from the second-tier: The trade performance of smaller southern US cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(5), pages 443-459, August.
    21. Chahine, Ricardo & Duarte, Jorge & Gkritza, Konstantina, 2025. "Effect of protected bike lanes on bike-sharing ridership: A New York City case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.