IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v38y2019i1p53-70n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sentimentality versus Transformation of the Historical Traditional Rural Landscape (A Case Study: The Landscape of Dutch Law Settlement in Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Markuszewska Iwona

    (Institute of Physical Geography and Environmental Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The study concentrated on social attitudes towards landscape heritage and the how the place of living was perceived in the context of the transformation of the rural landscape that is currently taking place. The following question was formulated: Are individuals’ approaches to landscape and their attachment to their place of living essential in terms of landscaping and future landscape changes? The research revealed that individual perceptions of rurality and the historical traditional rural landscape (HTRL) varied in different groups of interviewees. Nevertheless, observing the loss of the landscape’s beauty was a traumatic experience, and destructive changes to the landscape were difficult to accept for most of individuals who had spent their lives in the countryside and who felt a strong sense of patrimony. Conversely, the HTRL presented a less important value to other respondents, thus the destruction they observed of the local heritage induced less painful feelings in them. Overall, the results suggest that it is one’s personal interest that will ultimately decide about his/her preservation of the HTRL in the nearest future.

Suggested Citation

  • Markuszewska Iwona, 2019. "Sentimentality versus Transformation of the Historical Traditional Rural Landscape (A Case Study: The Landscape of Dutch Law Settlement in Poland)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 53-70, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:38:y:2019:i:1:p:53-70:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2019-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/quageo-2019-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Lefebvre & Maria Espinosa & Sergio Gomez y Paloma & Maria Luisa Paracchini & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada, 2015. "Agricultural landscapes as multi-scale public good and the role of the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(12), pages 2088-2112, December.
    2. Sklenicka, Petr & Kottová, Blanka & Šálek, Miroslav, 2017. "Success in preserving historic rural landscapes under various policy measures: Incentives, restrictions or planning?," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Jana Špulerová & Peter Bezák & Marta Dobrovodská & Juraj Lieskovský & Dagmar Štefunková, 2017. "Traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia: why should we preserve them?," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 891-903, November.
    4. Joks Janssen & Eric Luiten & Hans Renes & Eva Stegmeijer, 2017. "Heritage as sector, factor and vector: conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1654-1672, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao Zhu & Shousheng Chai & Jieqi Chen & Ian Phau, 2024. "How was rural tourism developed in China? Examining the impact of China’s evolving rural tourism policies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28945-28969, November.
    2. Viola Fabi & Maria Pilar Vettori & Emilio Faroldi, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse Practices and Sustainable Urban Development: Perspectives of Innovation for European Historic Spa Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Heider, Katharina & Quaranta, Emanuele & García Avilés, José María & Rodriguez Lopez, Juan Miguel & Balbo, Andrea L. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Reinventing the wheel – The preservation and potential of traditional water wheels in the terraced irrigated landscapes of the Ricote Valley, southeast Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. van Zanten, Boris T. & Zasada, Ingo & Koetse, Mark J. & Ungaro, Fabrizio & Häfner, Kati & Verburg, Peter H., 2016. "A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 87-98.
    6. Matteo Zavalloni & Meri Raggi & Davide Viaggi, 2016. "Assessing Collective Measures in Rural Policy: The Effect of Minimum Participation Rules on the Distribution of Benefits from Irrigation Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Bridging the Gap between Landscape and Management within Marinas: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Nataša Danilović Hristić & Marija Lalošević & Nebojša Stefanović, 2023. "Implementation of Urban Solution for New Faculty Facilities within Spatial Historical and Cultural Units—A Case Study of Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Mladen Obad Šćitaroci & Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, 2019. "Heritage Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, May.
    10. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Apostolos G. Papadopoulos, 2015. "The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 4(1), pages 22-53, April.
    12. Thomas Dax & Karin Schroll & Ingrid Machold & Martyna Derszniak-Noirjean & Bernd Schuh & Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen, 2021. "Land Abandonment in Mountain Areas of the EU: An Inevitable Side Effect of Farming Modernization and Neglected Threat to Sustainable Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Merari Torreblanca & Flavio Choquehuanca & Javier Martínez & Michael Alfaro, 2024. "Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for Peri-Urban Agricultural and Natural Areas at an Intermediate Scale: A Case Study of Arequipa, Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Robert Huber & Robert Finger, 2020. "A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 357-383, June.
    15. Marko OGOREVC & Renata SLABE-ERKER, 2018. "Assessment of the European Common Agricultural Policy and landscape changes: an example from Slovenia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(11), pages 489-498.
    16. Despina Dimelli & Areti Kotsoni, 2023. "The Reconstruction of Post-War Cities—Proposing Integrated Conservation Plans for Aleppo’s Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Christer Gustafsson & Elisabetta Lazzaro, 2021. "The Innovative Response of Cultural and Creative Industries to Major European Societal Challenges: Toward a Knowledge and Competence Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Francesca L. Falco & Eran Feitelson & Tamar Dayan, 2021. "Spatial Scale Mismatches in the EU Agri-Biodiversity Conservation Policy. The Case for a Shift to Landscape-Scale Design," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Mastronardi, Luigi & Giannelli, Agostino & Romagnoli, Luca, 2021. "Detecting the land use of ancient transhumance routes (Tratturi) and their potential for Italian inner areas’ growth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Nan Bai & Pirouz Nourian & Ana Pereira Roders & Raoul Bunschoten & Weixin Huang & Lu Wang, 2023. "Investigating rural public spaces with cultural significance using morphological, cognitive and behavioural data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 94-116, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:38:y:2019:i:1:p:53-70:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.