IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p611-d1019317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Evidence Mapping to Assess the Sustainability of Bioplastics Derived from Food Waste: Do We Know Enough?

Author

Listed:
  • Spyridoula Gerassimidou

    (Sustainable Plastics Research Group (SPlasH), Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
    Division of Environmental Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Olwenn V. Martin

    (Department of Arts and Science, University College London, London WC1H, UK)

  • Gilenny Yamily Feliz Diaz

    (Division of Environmental Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Chaoying Wan

    (International Institute for Nanocomposites Manufacturing (IINM), WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK)

  • Dimitrios Komilis

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Eleni Iacovidou

    (Sustainable Plastics Research Group (SPlasH), Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
    Division of Environmental Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

Abstract

The production of bioplastics from food loss and waste (FLW), termed FLW-derived bioplastics, is considered an attractive alternative to first-generation bioplastics. To our knowledge, a clear understanding of the sustainability performance of FLW-derived bioplastics from environmental, economic, technical, and social aspects is still lacking. This systematic evidence mapping aims to fill this gap by undertaking a reality check on the life cycle sustainability performance of FLW-derived bioplastics from a multidimensional perspective underpinned by systems thinking approach to assess their potential to revolutionise the plastics economy. Results revealed that FLW-derived bioplastic production is highly complex and uncertain. The low technological readiness of FLW valorisation processes and the under-researched logistics of FLW management on a regional scale currently withhold advancement in this field. Nonetheless, progress is looming, and ensuring that FLW-derived bioplastics production enables the transition toward a sustainable bioeconomy is critical. Innovation in both the food and plastics value chains is urgently needed to address their challenges and mitigate pollution. Yet, any steps forward need to be holistically calculated to yield sustainability benefits and prevent unintended consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Spyridoula Gerassimidou & Olwenn V. Martin & Gilenny Yamily Feliz Diaz & Chaoying Wan & Dimitrios Komilis & Eleni Iacovidou, 2022. "Systematic Evidence Mapping to Assess the Sustainability of Bioplastics Derived from Food Waste: Do We Know Enough?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:611-:d:1019317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Imbert, Enrica & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A Socio-economic Indicator for EoL Strategies for Bio-based Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Giuliana Vinci & Roberto Ruggieri & Andrea Billi & Carmine Pagnozzi & Maria Vittoria Di Loreto & Marco Ruggeri, 2021. "Sustainable Management of Organic Waste and Recycling for Bioplastics: A LCA Approach for the Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Giovanna Croxatto Vega & Joshua Sohn & Sander Bruun & Stig Irving Olsen & Morten Birkved, 2019. "Maximizing Environmental Impact Savings Potential through Innovative Biorefinery Alternatives: An Application of the TM-LCA Framework for Regional Scale Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel & Jens Ejbye Schmidt, 2018. "Increasing Profits in Food Waste Biorefinery—A Techno-Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwon, Oseok & Han, Jeehoon, 2021. "Waste-to-bioethanol supply chain network: A deterministic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Kim, Jung-Hun & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Tsang, Yiu Fai & Park, Young-Kwon & Lee, Jechan & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2020. "CO2-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of digestate with steel slag," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Muhamad Faizal Bin Mohamed Noor & Nitanan Koshy Matthew & Chong Leong Puan, 2024. "Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for an Increase Fee in Biodegradable Plastic Bag Use in Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    4. Fabio G. Santeramo & Monica Delsignore & Enrica Imbert & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2023. "The Future of the EU Bioenergy Sector: Economic, Environmental, Social, and Legislative Challenges," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 17(1), pages 1-1–52, April.
    5. Eliana Mancini & Viviana Negro & Davide Mainero & Andrea Raggi, 2022. "The Use of a Simplified Carbon Footprint Tool for Organic Waste Managers: Pros and Cons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Donatella Restuccia & Sabrina Antonia Prencipe & Marco Ruggeri & Umile Gianfranco Spizzirri, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Different Extra Virgin Olive Oil Extraction Methods through a Life Cycle Thinking Approach: Challenges and Opportunities in the Elaio-Technical Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Niloofar Akbarian-Saravi & Razieh Larizadeh & Arvind Gupta & Daniel Shum & Abbas S. Milani, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment Sheds New Insights Toward Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Resin Blends Used in Packaging: A Case Study on PBAT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Vonk, W.J. & Schut, A.G.T. & van Ittersum, M.K. & Grillot, M. & Topp, C.F.E. & Hendriks, R. & Hijbeek, R., 2025. "Environmental effects of improved regional nitrogen cycling in crop-livestock systems – A generic modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Prateek Jain & Mabel C. Chou & Faith Fan & Michelle Permata Santoso, 2021. "Embedding Sustainability in the Consumer Goods Innovation Cycle and Enabling Tools to Measure Progress and Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Ying, Zanyun & Qiu, Qianlinglin & Ye, Jiexu & Chen, Han & Zhao, Jingkai & Shen, Yao & Chu, Bei & Gao, Hanmin & Zhang, Shihan, 2024. "Mechanism, performance enhancement, and economic feasibility of CO2 microbial electrosynthesis systems: A data-driven analysis of research topics and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Kwon, Oseok & Han, Jeehoon, 2021. "Supply chain management of butyric acid-derived butanol: Stochastic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    12. Felipe Romero-Perdomo & Miguel Ángel González-Curbelo, 2023. "Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Ting Yang & Kaile Zhou, 2024. "Green development evaluation of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt based on hierarchical clustering and composite ecosystem index system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21197-21216, August.
    14. Kwon, Oseok & Kim, Juyeon & Han, Jeehoon, 2022. "Organic waste derived biodiesel supply chain network: Deterministic multi-period planning model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    15. Zhao Qi Sun & Sung Joon Yoon, 2022. "What Makes People Pay Premium Price for Eco-Friendly Products? The Effects of Ethical Consumption Consciousness, CSR, and Product Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Anna M. Walker & Alberto Simboli & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Andrea Raggi, 2024. "Adopting a socio‐material perspective on life cycle assessment: Environmental impacts of circular tableware systems in Italy's bioplastics context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3423-3439, August.
    17. Antonis Skouloudis & Chrysovalantis Malesios & Demetris-Francis Lekkas, 2024. "Notes from the Field: Public Views on Bioplastics-Findings from Greece," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 791-813, March.
    18. Byun, Jaewon & Han, Jeehoon, 2021. "Economically feasible production of green methane from vegetable and fruit-rich food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    20. Onwudili, Jude A. & Nouwe Edou, Danielle J., 2022. "Process modelling and economic evaluation of biopropane production from aqueous butyric acid feedstock," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 80-90.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:611-:d:1019317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.