IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8645-d1758526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment Sheds New Insights Toward Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Resin Blends Used in Packaging: A Case Study on PBAT

Author

Listed:
  • Niloofar Akbarian-Saravi

    (Materials and Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Razieh Larizadeh

    (Materials and Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Arvind Gupta

    (CTK Research and Development Canada Ltd., Surrey, BC V3S 2A7, Canada)

  • Daniel Shum

    (CTK Research and Development Canada Ltd., Surrey, BC V3S 2A7, Canada)

  • Abbas S. Milani

    (Materials and Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

Abstract

Bioplastics are gaining attention as eco-friendly alternatives to conventional plastics, with Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate (PBAT) emerging as a promising biodegradable substitute for polyethylene (PE) in food packaging. Commercial PBAT is often blended with other plastics or bio-based fillers to improve mechanical properties and reduce costs, though these additives can influence its environmental footprint. Therefore, this study quantifies the environmental impacts of producing PBAT resin blends reinforced with common inorganic fillers and compares end-of-life (EoL) performance against PE. While prior studies have largely assessed virgin PBAT or PBAT/Polylactic Acid (PLA) systems, systematic LCA of commercial-style PBAT blends with inorganic fillers and screening LCA level for comparisons of composting vs. landfill remain limited. The contributions of this study are to: (i) map gate-to-gate environmental hotspots for PBAT-blend conversion, (ii) provide a screening gate-to-grave comparison of PBAT composting vs. PE landfill using ReCiPe 2016 and IPCC GWP100 methods, and (iii) discuss theoretical implications for material substitution in the context of EoL strategies. The results indicated that producing 1 kg of PBAT blend generated a single score impact of 921 mPt with Human Health and Resource categories contributing similarly, and a GWP of 8.64 kg CO 2 -eq, dominated by mixing and drying processes. EoL screening showed PBAT composting offered clear advantages over landfilling PE, yielding −53.9 mPt and 11.35 kg CO 2 -eq savings, effectively offsetting production emissions. In contrast, landfilling PE resulted in 288.8 mPt and 2.2 kg CO 2 -eq emissions. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that a 30% reduction in electricity use could decrease impacts by up to 10%, underscoring the importance of energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy adoption for sustainable PBAT development.

Suggested Citation

  • Niloofar Akbarian-Saravi & Razieh Larizadeh & Arvind Gupta & Daniel Shum & Abbas S. Milani, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment Sheds New Insights Toward Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Resin Blends Used in Packaging: A Case Study on PBAT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8645-:d:1758526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8645-:d:1758526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.