IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p411-d1016040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling a New Supplier Preference Paradigm: A Business-to-Business and African Developing Economy Context

Author

Listed:
  • Rodney Duffett

    (Marketing Department, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Myles Wakeham

    (Marketing Department, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

Abstract

The recent COVID-19 pandemic, and subsequent invasion of Ukraine by Russia, has demonstrated to the world the volatile and fragile nature of global supply chains. Hence, this study is based on research gaps that propose new sustainable business-to-business (B2B) procurement/supplier models that consider different factors across industries and uses the triple bottom line (TBL) framework as the theoretical underpinning. The study used a quantitative methodological approach and convenience sampling to survey 445 organizations in a B2B procurement context in South Africa. The data were analyzed via structural equation modeling. The inquiry revealed that service quality was important to determine access to personnel and environmental sustainability, which had a favorable influence on personal relationships and gifts and, in turn, positively influenced relationships with salespeople and management. Culture, employment equity, and affirmative action positively affected Black Economic Empowerment status which had a favorable influence on the preference of suppliers’ salespeople. Several other positive associations were revealed, which resulted in a unique theoretical supplier preference contribution to the TBL framework. The study also provides organizations with a number of practical benefits stemming from the associations between the new sustainable B2B procurement/supplier constructs that are important as value-added business activities in an African developing economic context.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodney Duffett & Myles Wakeham, 2022. "Modeling a New Supplier Preference Paradigm: A Business-to-Business and African Developing Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:411-:d:1016040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrei Yakovlev & Olga Demidova, 2012. "Access of firms to public procurement in Russia in the 2000s: before and after radical reform of regulation," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 140-157.
    2. Marian Siminicã & Marioara Avram & Luminita Popescu & Roxana Loredana Avram, 2020. "The Adoption of National Green Procurement Plans from the Perspective of Circular Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Adobor, Henry, 2006. "The role of personal relationships in inter-firm alliances: Benefits, dysfunctions, and some suggestions," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 473-486.
    4. Rodney Duffett & Tudor Edu & Norbert Haydam & Iliuta-Costel Negricea & Rodica Zaharia, 2018. "A Multi-Dimensional Approach of Green Marketing Competitive Advantage: A Perspective of Small Medium and Micro Enterprises from Western Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Suresh Kumar Jakhar & Arijit Bhattacharya & Himanshu Rathore & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2020. "Stakeholder pressure for sustainability: Can ‘innovative capabilities’ explain the idiosyncratic response in the manufacturing firms?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2635-2653, September.
    6. Tudor Ciumara & Iulia Lupu, 2020. "Green Procurement Practices in Romania: Evidence from a Survey at the Level of Local Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Adelaide Owusu Agyepong & Godwell Nhamo, 2017. "Green procurement in South Africa: perspectives on legislative provisions in metropolitan municipalities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2457-2474, December.
    8. Padgett, Daniel & Hopkins, Christopher D. & Williams, Zac, 2020. "Buyer dependence in B2B relationships: The role of supplier investments, commitment form, and trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 13-24.
    9. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S. Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2019. "Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 69-82.
    10. Jitendra Narayan Biswal & Kamalakanta Muduli & Suchismita Satapathy, 2017. "Critical analysis of drivers and barriers of sustainable supply chain management in Indian thermal sector," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 411-430.
    11. Marasco, Alessandra, 2008. "Third-party logistics: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 127-147, May.
    12. Nils M. Høgevold & Göran Svensson & Mercy Mpinganjira, 2020. "Precursors and outcomes of satisfaction in seller-customer business relationships: a sales perspective," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 531-552.
    13. Tony Cragg & Sarrah Chraibi, 2020. "Reviewing procurement: a change management model based on action research," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(6), pages 737-755.
    14. Stephanie M. Mangus & Eli Jones & Judith Anne Garretson Folse & Shrihari Sridhar, 2020. "The interplay between business and personal trust on relationship performance in conditions of market turbulence," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1138-1155, November.
    15. John D. Hanson & Joachim Henkel, 2020. "Collaborative innovation: weak commitments and unenforceable contracts," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 63-82.
    16. Yudi Fernando & Geevaneswary Saththasivam, 2017. "Green supply chain agility in EMS ISO 14001 manufacturing firms: empirical justification of social and environmental performance as an organisational outcome," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 51-69.
    17. Mahmoud Abdulhadi Alabdali & Mohammad Asif Salam, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Procurement for Creating Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Liying & Mao, Hongyi & Zhao, Taiyang & Wang, Valerie Lynette & Wang, Xiaodong & Zuo, Peng, 2022. "How B2B platform improves Buyers’ performance: Insights into platform’s substitution effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 72-80.
    2. Mahdi Bashiri & Benny Tjahjono & Jordon Lazell & Jennifer Ferreira & Tomy Perdana, 2021. "The Dynamics of Sustainability Risks in the Global Coffee Supply Chain: A Case of Indonesia–UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Jayaram, Jayanth & Tan, Keah-Choon, 2010. "Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 262-271, June.
    5. Lynch, Patrick & O'Toole, Thomas & Biemans, Wim, 2014. "From conflict to crisis in collaborative NPD," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1145-1153.
    6. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    7. Coltman, Tim & Devinney, Timothy M. & Keating, Byron W., 2010. "Best-worst scaling approach to predict customer choice for 3PL services," MPRA Paper 40492, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Sudhanshu Joshi & Manu Sharma & Rashmi Prava Das & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Justyna Żywiołek & Kamalakanta Muduli & Mukesh Prasad, 2022. "Modeling Conceptual Framework for Implementing Barriers of AI in Public Healthcare for Improving Operational Excellence: Experiences from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Skackauskiene Ilona & Vilkaite-Vaitone Neringa, 2019. "Methodological Perspective of Evaluation of Green Marketing Performance," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 183-191, January.
    10. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Byungok Ahn & Boyoung Kim & Jongpil Yu, 2022. "Effects of Supplier’s Competitive Factors on Relationship Performance and Product Recommendation in Crop Protection Retail Sector," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Shen, Bin & Xu, Xiaoyan & Guo, Shu, 2019. "The impacts of logistics services on short life cycle products in a global supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 153-167.
    13. Urbaniak Maciej, 2021. "Role of supplier evaluation criteria in risk mitigation related to purchasing process," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 96-106, June.
    14. Anderson, Edward & Coltman, Tim & Devinney, Timothy M. & Keating, Byron W., 2010. "What Drives the Choice of Third Party Logistics Provider?," MPRA Paper 40508, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Renata C. A. Mendonça & Ivo V. Pedrosa & Maria Amália O. A. Camara, 2021. "Sustainable public procurement in a Brazilian higher education institution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 17094-17125, November.
    16. LUPU Iulia & CRISTE Adina, 2023. "Climate Change In The Discourse Of Central Banks. Influence On Financial Stability At The European Level," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(2), pages 235-246, August.
    17. Dennis Coates & Iuliia Naidenova & Petr Parshakov, 2019. "Determinants of governmental support of Russian companies: lessons on industrial policy, rent-seeking and corruption," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 438-466, December.
    18. Julia Hartmann & Sebastian Forkmann & Sabine Benoit & Stephan C. Henneberg, 2022. "A consumer perspective on managing the consequences of chain liability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 58-89, October.
    19. Madhuri Saripalle, 2018. "Determinants of profitability in the Indian logistics industry," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 13-27.
    20. Belieres, Simon & Hewitt, Mike & Jozefowiez, Nicolas & Semet, Frédéric, 2021. "A time-expanded network reduction matheuristic for the logistics service network design problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:411-:d:1016040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.