IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i1p94-113.html

Green Disposable Packaging and Communication: The Implications of Bring-Your-Own-Container

Author

Listed:
  • Yunlong Peng

    (Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom)

  • Fei Gao

    (Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405)

  • Jian Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Research Center for Contemporary Management, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : A growing number of firms are encouraging consumers to participate in “bring-your-own-container” (BYOC) behavior in which consumers bring their own reusable packaging to purchase and consume products, thus reducing single-use packaging waste. In this paper, we study the environmental implications of a firm’s BYOC implementation when considering its disposable packaging choice and communication strategy. Methodology/results : We build a stylized model to study a firm’s joint decisions on BYOC, disposable packaging choice, and communication and their implications on the environment. Our main results follow. First, allowing BYOC reduces the firm’s incentive to make fraudulent green claims about its disposable product packaging; however, BYOC implementation may harm the overall environment while improving the firm’s profit, thereby creating a new form of greenwashing. Second, the adoption of third-party certification for green disposable packaging is an effective remedy to mitigate the negative environmental impact of BYOC. In addition, the environmental implications of adopting third-party certification (either voluntarily or because of government mandates) depend on the relationship between the environmental qualities of green disposable packaging and reusable packaging. Whereas it always benefits the environment when the firm’s green disposable packaging has better environmental performance, adopting certification may negatively impact the environment if consumers’ reusable packaging is greener. Furthermore, we find numerically that offering a price discount for BYOC may encourage the firm to adopt certification because of increased profitability, thereby leading to the aforementioned environmental implications. Managerial implications : We offer operational insights on how firms should make joint decisions on BYOC, disposable packaging choice, and communication. We also generate insights on how governments should regulate firms’ green claims when firms start to allow BYOC.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunlong Peng & Fei Gao & Jian Chen, 2025. "Green Disposable Packaging and Communication: The Implications of Bring-Your-Own-Container," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 94-113, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:1:p:94-113
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0605
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Managing Supplier Social and Environmental Impacts with Voluntary Versus Mandatory Disclosure to Investors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3311-3328, August.
    2. Frey, Bruno S & Oberholzer-Gee, Felix, 1997. "The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(4), pages 746-755, September.
    3. Jean Tirole & Roland Bénabou, 2006. "Incentives and Prosocial Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1652-1678, December.
    4. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 489-500, May.
    5. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    6. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2022. "Consumer trust in social responsibility communications: The role of supply chain visibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4113-4130, November.
    7. Fei Gao & Gilvan C. Souza, 2022. "Carbon Offsetting with Eco-Conscious Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7879-7897, November.
    8. Chialin Chen, 2001. "Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 250-263, February.
    9. Jiayu Chen & Anyan Qi & Milind Dawande, 2020. "Supplier Centrality and Auditing Priority in Socially Responsible Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1199-1214, November.
    10. Joonas Rokka & Liisa Uusitalo, 2008. "Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices : Do consumers care?," Post-Print hal-02313351, HAL.
    11. Brach, Simon & Walsh, Gianfranco & Shaw, Deirdre, 2018. "Sustainable consumption and third-party certification labels: Consumers’ perceptions and reactions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 254-265.
    12. Ioannis Bellos & Stylianos Kavadias, 2019. "When Should Customers Control Service Delivery? Implications for Service Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 890-907, April.
    13. Soo-Haeng Cho & Xin Fang & Sridhar Tayur & Ying Xu, 2019. "Combating Child Labor: Incentives and Information Disclosure in Global Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 692-711, July.
    14. Yen-Ting Lin & Haoying Sun & Shouqiang Wang, 2020. "Designing Sustainable Products Under Coproduction Technology," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1181-1198, November.
    15. Yue Wu & Kaifu Zhang & Jinhong Xie, 2020. "Bad Greenwashing, Good Greenwashing: Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3095-3112, July.
    16. Soham Baksi & Pinaki Bose, 2007. "Credence Goods, Efficient Labelling Policies, and Regulatory Enforcement," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(2), pages 411-430, June.
    17. Fei Gao, 2020. "Cause Marketing: Product Pricing, Design, and Distribution," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 775-791, July.
    18. Shi Chen & Qinqin Zhang & Yong‐Pin Zhou, 2019. "Impact of Supply Chain Transparency on Sustainability under NGO Scrutiny," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 3002-3022, December.
    19. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Kay-Yut Chen, 2011. "Trust in Forecast Information Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1111-1137, June.
    20. Yu-Shan Chen, 2010. "The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 307-319, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Junwei & Zhang, Huiqin & Zhang, Yuxiang & Xie, Deru, 2026. "Firm remanufacturing and product distinction decisions: The implications of servitization implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Xiutian & Chan, Hau-Ling & Dong, Ciwei, 2020. "Impacts of competition between buying firms on corporate social responsibility efforts: Does competition do more harm than good?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Gao, Ruoxin & Yao, Shiqing & Yang, Ruina, 2024. "Responsible audit and consumer awareness under collusion risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 466-476.
    3. Fan, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Jianxiong & Yao, Yao & Wei, Liqun, 2024. "Social responsibility disclosure format in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Fei Gao & Gilvan C. Souza, 2022. "Carbon Offsetting with Eco-Conscious Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7879-7897, November.
    5. Tao Lu & Brian Tomlin, 2022. "Sourcing from a Self-Reporting Supplier: Strategic Communication of Social Responsibility in a Supply Chain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 902-920, March.
    6. Xiaole Chen & Vernon N. Hsu & Guoming Lai & Yang Li, 2023. "Supply chain short‐term financing for responsible production at small and medium‐sized enterprises," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 4154-4171, December.
    7. Chen, Qi & Duan, Yongrui, 2023. "Impact of information disclosure on global supply chain greenwashing: Is more information transparency always better?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    8. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    9. Lingxiu Dong & Iva Rashkova & Duo Shi, 2022. "Food Safety Audits in Developing Economies: Decentralization vs. Centralization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 2863-2881, November.
    10. Zhao, Sai & Duan, Hongbo, 2025. "Economic and environmental impacts of ecolabeling under different product cost structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Qi Feng & Chengzhang Li & Mengshi Lu & J. George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Implementing Environmental and Social Responsibility Programs in Supply Networks Through Multiunit Bilateral Negotiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2579-2599, April.
    12. Lu Huang & Jing-Sheng Song & Robert Swinney, 2022. "Managing Social Responsibility in Multitier Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 2843-2862, November.
    13. Zhu, Shichao & Xia, Yusen & Yu, Lean & Li, Jian, 2025. "Leveraging blockchain technology to prevent deceptive disclosure of ESG compliance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Nils Roemer & Gilvan C. Souza & Christian Tröster & Guido Voigt, 2023. "Offset or reduce: How should firms implement carbon footprint reduction initiatives?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(9), pages 2940-2955, September.
    15. Xiang Gao & Xiaolan Qiu & Beibei Shang, 2026. "Strategic Insights From Voluntary and Mandatory ESG Evaluations in a Competitive Market," Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(1), pages 116-148, February.
    16. Wei, Lin & Zheng, Shengming & Du, Shaofu & Zhang, Baofeng, 2025. "Agency selling or reselling: The role of cause marketing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(2), pages 343-357.
    17. Yu-Shan Chen & Shu-Tzu Hung & Ting-Yu Wang & A-Fen Huang & Yen-Wen Liao, 2017. "The Influence of Excessive Product Packaging on Green Brand Attachment: The Mediation Roles of Green Brand Attitude and Green Brand Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    18. LiGuo Yang & Lin Lu, 2025. "Improving supply chain transparency: from the perspective of suppliers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 350(3), pages 1331-1362, July.
    19. Sammi Y. Tang & Jing-Sheng Song, 2023. "Effect of Guided Delegation and Information Proximity on Multitier Responsible Sourcing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2314-2332, November.
    20. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Reveal the Supplier List? A Trade-off in Capacity vs. Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1251-1267, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:1:p:94-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.