IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i6p2863-2881.html

Food Safety Audits in Developing Economies: Decentralization vs. Centralization

Author

Listed:
  • Lingxiu Dong

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Iva Rashkova

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Duo Shi

    (School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China; Shenzhen Finance Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : This paper investigates and compares two types of food safety auditing structures: decentralized and centralized audits. Academic/practical relevance : Decentralized food safety auditing systems are common among developing economies, that is, different tiers of a food supply chain are audited by separate government agencies. Such an auditing structure has been widely criticized as ineffective at mitigating food safety risks. Some developing countries began implementing centralized auditing systems as a remedy for the mis-coordination across local auditing agencies. We compare food safety outcomes and economical payoffs of the two auditing systems. Methodology : We study a parsimonious game-theoretic model of a one-supplier, one-buyer supply chain and two agencies auditing each tier of the supply chain, respectively. Under decentralized audits, each of the two agencies minimizes its individual cost, and their decisions are sequential; under centralized audits, the agencies minimize total agency cost and make auditing commitment up front. Results : We identify forces that drive equilibrium decisions under decentralized audits. The penalty-shield effect of an agency’s auditing capability may lead to risky behavior by the supplier. The free-riding effect between the two agencies may lead to less auditing. A centralized commitment makes the agencies the leader in the game at the expense of them losing the flexibility to respond to the actions of supply chain members. The common objective under centralization strengthens the incentives for at least one agency to conduct an audit, but it may also induce the lower-cost, less-capable agency to audit. Hence, centralized audits can be detrimental to performance regarding both food safety outcomes and system payoff. Managerial implications : Changing the auditing structure from decentralization to centralization may fail to improve food safety and system payoff insofar as it may replace one form of inefficiency with another. Addressing the new inefficiencies should be part of the ongoing effort to enhance the efficacy of centralized audits.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingxiu Dong & Iva Rashkova & Duo Shi, 2022. "Food Safety Audits in Developing Economies: Decentralization vs. Centralization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 2863-2881, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:2863-2881
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.1058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1058
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.1058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Onur Boyabatlı & Javad Nasiry & Yangfang (Helen) Zhou, 2019. "Crop Planning in Sustainable Agriculture: Dynamic Farmland Allocation in the Presence of Crop Rotation Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2060-2076, May.
    2. Liying Mu & Milind Dawande & Xianjun Geng & Vijay Mookerjee, 2016. "Milking the Quality Test: Improving the Milk Supply Chain Under Competing Collection Intermediaries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1259-1277, May.
    3. Tim Noparumpa & Burak Kazaz & Scott Webster, 2015. "Wine Futures and Advance Selling Under Quality Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 411-426, July.
    4. Xin Fang & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Cooperative Approaches to Managing Social Responsibility in a Market with Externalities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1215-1233, November.
    5. Sang-Hyun Kim, 2015. "Time to Come Clean? Disclosure and Inspection Policies for Green Production," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Jiayu Chen & Anyan Qi & Milind Dawande, 2020. "Supplier Centrality and Auditing Priority in Socially Responsible Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1199-1214, November.
    7. Huaxia Rui & Guoming Lai, 2015. "Sourcing with Deferred Payment and Inspection under Supplier Product Adulteration Risk," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(6), pages 934-946, June.
    8. Liying Mu & Milind Dawande & Vijay Mookerjee, 2014. "Improving the Milk Supply Chain in Developing Countries: Analysis, Insights, and Recommendations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(7), pages 1098-1112, July.
    9. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2016. "Supplier Evasion of a Buyer’s Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 184-197, May.
    10. Baris Ata & Deishin Lee & Mustafa H. Tongarlak, 2012. "Optimizing Organic Waste to Energy Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 231-244, April.
    11. Shi Chen & Qinqin Zhang & Yong‐Pin Zhou, 2019. "Impact of Supply Chain Transparency on Sustainability under NGO Scrutiny," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 3002-3022, December.
    12. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2017. "Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2795-2812, September.
    13. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    14. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2020. "Motivating Supplier Social Responsibility Under Incomplete Visibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1268-1286, November.
    15. Lee, Deishin & Sönmez, Erkut & Gómez, Miguel I. & Fan, Xiaoli, 2017. "Combining two wrongs to make two rights: Mitigating food insecurity and food waste through gleaning operations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 40-52.
    16. Felipe Caro & Prashant Chintapalli & Kumar Rajaram & Chris S. Tang, 2018. "Improving Supplier Compliance Through Joint and Shared Audits with Collective Penalty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 363-380, May.
    17. Hsiao†Hui Lee & Cuihong Li, 2018. "Supplier Quality Management: Investment, Inspection, and Incentives," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(2), pages 304-322, February.
    18. Calvin, Linda & Gale, H. Frederick, Jr. & Hu, Dinghuan & Lohmar, Bryan, 2006. "Food Safety Improvements Underway in China," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-6, November.
    19. Maqbool Dada & Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Leroy B. Schwarz, 2007. "A Newsvendor's Procurement Problem when Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 9-32, August.
    20. Onur Boyabatlı & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Stephen R. Koontz, 2011. "Integrating Long-Term and Short-Term Contracting in Beef Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1771-1787, October.
    21. Soo-Haeng Cho & Xin Fang & Sridhar Tayur & Ying Xu, 2019. "Combating Child Labor: Incentives and Information Disclosure in Global Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 692-711, July.
    22. Bin Hu & Dimitris Kostamis, 2015. "Managing Supply Disruptions when Sourcing from Reliable and Unreliable Suppliers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(5), pages 808-820, May.
    23. Retsef Levi & Somya Singhvi & Yanchong Zheng, 2020. "Economically Motivated Adulteration in Farming Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 209-226, January.
    24. Liying Mu & Milind Dawande & Vijay Mookerjee, 2019. "Shaping the Values of a Milk Cooperative: Theoretical and Practical Considerations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(9), pages 2259-2278, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zamiri-Noghreh, Emad & Safarzadeh, Soroush & Ranjbar, Mohammad, 2025. "A game theoretic framework for analyzing milk supply chain safety and quality," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Akhil Bhardwaj & Henk Akkermans, 2024. "Frontiers in Operations: The Confidence Trap in Operations Management Practices: Anatomy of Man-Made Disasters," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1245-1268, July.
    3. Xiaotong Guo & Yong He, 2025. "The setting of risk prevention threshold of the perishable product supply chain with retailer’s uncertain risk preference," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(3), pages 3049-3079, December.
    4. Feng, Zhangwei & Luo, Na & Wu, Lingxiao & Liu, Yanping & Sima, Herbert, 2025. "Preservation modes and channel leadership in seafood supply chains: A comparative study of chilled and frozen strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaole Chen & Vernon N. Hsu & Guoming Lai & Yang Li, 2023. "Supply chain short‐term financing for responsible production at small and medium‐sized enterprises," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 4154-4171, December.
    2. Fu, Hongyong & Lei, Yifeng & Zhang, Shuguang & Zhao, Kexin & Zhao, Yanlu, 2024. "Unravelling the carbon emissions compliance in sustainable supply chains: The impacts of carbon audit cooperation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Tao Lu & Brian Tomlin, 2022. "Sourcing from a Self-Reporting Supplier: Strategic Communication of Social Responsibility in a Supply Chain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 902-920, March.
    4. Qi Feng & Chengzhang Li & Mengshi Lu & J. George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Implementing Environmental and Social Responsibility Programs in Supply Networks Through Multiunit Bilateral Negotiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2579-2599, April.
    5. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Sriram Sankaranarayanan, 2023. "Cooperative security against interdependent risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3504-3520, November.
    6. Gao, Ruoxin & Yao, Shiqing & Yang, Ruina, 2024. "Responsible audit and consumer awareness under collusion risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 466-476.
    7. Retsef Levi & Somya Singhvi & Yanchong Zheng, 2020. "Economically Motivated Adulteration in Farming Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 209-226, January.
    8. Tarkan Tan & M. Hakan Akyüz & Bengisu Urlu & Santiago Ruiz, 2024. "Stop Auditing and Start to CARE: Paradigm Shift in Assessing and Improving Supplier Sustainability," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 241-263, May.
    9. Keskin, Burcu B. & Griffin, Emily C. & Prell, Jonathan O. & Dilkina, Bistra & Ferber, Aaron & MacDonald, John & Hilend, Rowan & Griffis, Stanley & Gore, Meredith L., 2023. "Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Shi, Xiutian & Chan, Hau-Ling & Dong, Ciwei, 2020. "Impacts of competition between buying firms on corporate social responsibility efforts: Does competition do more harm than good?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Sammi Y. Tang & Jing-Sheng Song, 2023. "Effect of Guided Delegation and Information Proximity on Multitier Responsible Sourcing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2314-2332, November.
    12. Han Zhang & Goker Aydin & Rodney P. Parker, 2022. "Social Responsibility Auditing in Supply Chain Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1058-1077, February.
    13. Yao Cui & Ming Hu & Jingchen Liu, 2023. "Value and Design of Traceability-Driven Blockchains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 1099-1116, May.
    14. Xin Fang & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Cooperative Approaches to Managing Social Responsibility in a Market with Externalities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1215-1233, November.
    15. Albert Y. Ha & Weixin Shang & Yunjie Wang, 2023. "Supplier Audit Information Sharing and Responsible Sourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 308-324, January.
    16. Jiayu Chen & Anyan Qi & Milind Dawande, 2020. "Supplier Centrality and Auditing Priority in Socially Responsible Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1199-1214, November.
    17. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    18. Liu, Weihua & Wei, Wanying & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2022. "Impacts of leadership on corporate social responsibility management in multi-tier supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 483-496.
    19. Biswas, Samir & Basu, Preetam & Avittathur, Balram, 2025. "Milk adulteration testing and impact of farmers efficiency heterogeneity: A strategic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 686-700.
    20. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Reveal the Supplier List? A Trade-off in Capacity vs. Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1251-1267, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:2863-2881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.