IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10169-d457413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Procurement Practices in Romania: Evidence from a Survey at the Level of Local Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Tudor Ciumara

    (“Victor Slăvescu” Centre for Financial and Monetary Research, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Iulia Lupu

    (“Victor Slăvescu” Centre for Financial and Monetary Research, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Public procurement is considered an important driver of an economy and has a considerable power in orienting the market, including toward environmental protection policies and strategies. This study examines the green public procurement practiced at the level of local Romanian authorities with the aim of understanding the real context by highlighting the mix between what is required and/or expected from local authorities and what is actually happening in terms of green public procurement. The research is based on the results of an online survey conducted from 16 August 2019 to 18 September 2019. The research results show that green procurement is not a subject approached in many administrative units; however, it appears that environmental protection in the context of public procurement is considered important. In line with other research, our results enrich the current knowledge on green procurement practices at the local government level and indicate that increased regulatory pressure for green public procurement may lead to market development and innovation for green goods and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Tudor Ciumara & Iulia Lupu, 2020. "Green Procurement Practices in Romania: Evidence from a Survey at the Level of Local Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10169-:d:457413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindström, Hanna & Lundberg, Sofia & Marklund, Per-Olov, 2020. "How Green Public Procurement can drive conversion of farmland: An empirical analysis of an organic food policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Testa, Francesco & Iraldo, Fabio & Frey, Marco & Daddi, Tiberio, 2012. "What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 88-96.
    3. Lutz Preuss, 2007. "Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 354-365, July.
    4. Bleda, Mercedes & Chicot, Julien, 2020. "The role of public procurement in the formation of markets for innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 186-196.
    5. Joyce Thomson & Tim Jackson, 2007. "Sustainable procurement in practice: Lessons from local government," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 421-444.
    6. Teodora Roman & Ionel Bostan & Adriana Manolică & Iustin Mitrica, 2015. "Profile of Green Consumers in Romania in Light of Sustainability Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Vasile Dinu & Ion Schileru & Anca Atanase, 2012. "Attitude of Romanian Consumers Related to Products’ Ecological Labelling," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 8-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodney Duffett & Myles Wakeham, 2022. "Modeling a New Supplier Preference Paradigm: A Business-to-Business and African Developing Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Daniela CÎMPEAN, 2022. "Environmental Concerns.The Role Of Green Public Procurement In Romania Investigative Measures," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 55-69, February.
    3. LUPU Iulia & CRISTE Adina, 2023. "Climate Change In The Discourse Of Central Banks. Influence On Financial Stability At The European Level," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(2), pages 235-246, August.
    4. Liliana Topliceanu & Petru Gabriel Puiu & Catalin Drob & Vlad Vasile Topliceanu, 2022. "Analysis Regarding the Implementation of the Circular Economy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takuro Miyamoto & Naonari Yajima & Takahiro Tsukahara & Toshi H. Arimura, 2020. "Advancement of Green Public Purchasing by Category: Do Municipality Green Purchasing Policies Have Any Role in Japan?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Lindström, Hanna & Lundberg, Sofia & Marklund, Per-Olov, 2021. "Green Public Procurement: An empirical analysis of the uptake of organic food policy," Umeå Economic Studies 997, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    3. Bryngemark, Elina & Söderholm, Patrik & Thörn, Martina, 2023. "The adoption of green public procurement practices: Analytical challenges and empirical illustration on Swedish municipalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    4. Yanlin Ma & Yuting Liu & Andrea Appolloni & Junqi Liu, 2021. "Does green public procurement encourage firm's environmental certification practice? The mediation role of top management support," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1002-1017, May.
    5. Zhang, Zhaowen & Jiang, Yaohui, 2022. "Can green public procurement change energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Oliva Maria Dourado Martins & Dragan Ilic & Mădălina Belous & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Cezar Braicu & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2020. "Green and Sustainable Public Procurement—An Instrument for Nudging Consumer Behavior. A Case Study on Romanian Green Public Agriculture across Different Sectors of Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Liangze Ma & Rana Umair Ashraf & Muhammad Ahtisham ul Haq & Xianhua Fan, 2022. "Hurdles on the Way to Sustainable Development in the Education Sector of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Lindström, Hanna & Lundberg, Sofia & Marklund, Per-Olov, 2020. "How Green Public Procurement can drive conversion of farmland: An empirical analysis of an organic food policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Peter Džupka & Matúš Kubák & Peter Nemec, 2020. "Sustainable Public Procurement in Central European Countries. Can It Also Bring Savings?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Shadrina, Elena V. & Vinogradov, Dmitri V. & Kashin, Dmitry V., 2022. "Implicit incentives in green public procurement: Good intentions versus rigid regulations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hou, Fujun & Abbas, Qaisar, 2021. "Sustainability challenges in public health sector procurement: An application of interpretative structural modelling," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Mihaela Kardos & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Nicoleta Cristache, 2019. "Green Marketing’s Roles in Sustainability and Ecopreneurship. Case Study: Green Packaging’s Impact on Romanian Young Consumers’ Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Mario Pagliacci & Adriana Manolica & Teodora Roman & Gabriela Boldureanu, 2019. "The Consumers of Green Products. The Case of Romanian Moldavia Counties," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 830-830, November.
    14. Dries Couckuyt & Toshi H. Arimura & Takuro Miyamoto & Naonari Yajima, 2023. "Green Policymaking in Japanese Municipalities: An Empirical Study on External and Internal Contextual Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Walker, Helen & Brammer, Stephen, 2012. "The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 256-268.
    16. Patrik Hall & Karl Löfgren & Gregory Peters, 2016. "Greening the Street-Level Procurer: Challenges in the Strongly Decentralized Swedish System," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 467-483, December.
    17. Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Mirza, Faisal Mehmood & Hou, Fujun & Ashraf, Rana Umair, 2019. "Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Anthony Flynn & Paul Davis, 2016. "The policy–practice divide and SME-friendly public procurement," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 559-578, May.
    19. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Harney, Brian, 2021. "Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-88.
    20. Costache, Mioara & Sebastian Cristea, Dragos & Petrea, Stefan-Mihai & Neculita, Mihaela & Rahoveanu, Maria Magdalena Turek & Simionov, Ira-Adeline & Mogodan, Alina & Sarpe, Daniela & Rahoveanu, Adrian, 2021. "Integrating aquaponics production systems into the Romanian green procurement network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10169-:d:457413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.