IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5333-d804581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain Technologies and Digitalization in Function of Student Work Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Goran Bjelobaba

    (Department for e-Business, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Marija Paunovic

    (Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism, University of Kragujevac, 36210 Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia)

  • Ana Savic

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Academy of Technical and Art Applied Studies, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Hana Stefanovic

    (Comtrade Information Technology School of Applied Studies, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jelena Doganjic

    (Milenijum Osiguranje Insurance Company, JSIC, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zivanka Miladinovic Bogavac

    (Faculty of Business and Law, University “MB”, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Following COVID-19, new accreditation standards include digitization, entrepreneurship, social inclusion and the circular economy. Blockchain can help to simplify difficult accreditation processes that ensure worldwide teaching, learning, practice and business communication excellence. The paper proposes a Collaborative Learning and Student Work Evaluation (CLSWE) model based on blockchain technologies (BCTs) encompassing selected concepts from the scientific research peer-review process. BCTs are used to develop a safe platform for storing and exchanging data about students’ projects and evaluations. The CLSWE model offers the possibility of improving cooperation between higher-education institutions and companies that seek the “employable skills” of proactive students. Before implementing the CLSWE model, a questionnaire was conducted to survey lecturers about their attitudes related to the potential application of BCTs. The results of the surveys are encouraging and reveal a desire and willingness to introduce BCTs in education. A project scheme with the main functionalities of the model and a description of the roles of the prominent participants was designed. A platform with a database created in the MySQL language for the testing model was built. This research also contributes to higher education literature in terms of the sustainability of the education process and collaborative learning with BCTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Goran Bjelobaba & Marija Paunovic & Ana Savic & Hana Stefanovic & Jelena Doganjic & Zivanka Miladinovic Bogavac, 2022. "Blockchain Technologies and Digitalization in Function of Student Work Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5333-:d:804581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Fostering Equality in Education: The Blockchain Business Model for Higher Education (BBM-HE)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Milena P. Ilić & Marko Ranković & Milutin Dobrilović & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Larisa Mihoreanu & Mădălina Ionela Gheța & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2022. "Challenging Novelties within the Circular Economy Concept under the Digital Transformation of Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Hissu Hyvärinen & Marten Risius & Gustav Friis, 2017. "A Blockchain-Based Approach Towards Overcoming Financial Fraud in Public Sector Services," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 441-456, December.
    4. Giuseppe Varavallo & Giuseppe Caragnano & Fabrizio Bertone & Luca Vernetti-Prot & Olivier Terzo, 2022. "Traceability Platform Based on Green Blockchain: An Application Case Study in Dairy Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Valentin Kuleto & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Milena P. Ilić & Oliva M. D. Martins & Marko Ranković & Ana Sofia Coelho, 2022. "The Potential of Blockchain Technology in Higher Education as Perceived by Students in Serbia, Romania, and Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Oliva M. D. Martins & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Cătălin Gheorghiță & Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Enhances Sustainable Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Morkunas, Vida J. & Paschen, Jeannette & Boon, Edward, 2019. "How blockchain technologies impact your business model," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 295-306.
    8. Fang Liu & Wei-dong Zhu & Yu-wang Chen & Dong-ling Xu & Jian-bo Yang, 2017. "Evaluation, ranking and selection of R&D projects by multiple experts: an evidential reasoning rule based approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1501-1519, June.
    9. Nazir Ullah & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Osama Alfarraj & Fahad Mohammed Alblehai, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Adoption in Smart Learning Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    11. Michel Rauchs & Andrew Glidden & Brian Gordon & Gina Pieters & Martino Recanatini & Francois Rostand & Kathryn Vagneur & Bryan Zhang, 2018. "Distributed Ledger Technology Systems. A Conceptual Framework," Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Reports 201810-dlts, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larisa Gorina & Marina Gordova & Irina Khristoforova & Lyudmila Sundeeva & Wadim Strielkowski, 2023. "Sustainable Education and Digitalization through the Prism of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Isabela Neto Piccirillo & Daniel Capaldo Amaral & Maicon Gouvêa De Oliveira, 2022. "A Research Agenda for Collaborative Roadmapping Supported by Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Mao Zhao & Wei Liu & Abu Naser Mohammad Saif & Bo Wang & Rasheda Akter Rupa & K. M. Anwarul Islam & S. M. Masudur Rahman & Nusrat Hafiz & Rehnuma Mostafa & Mohammad Anisur Rahman, 2023. "Blockchain in Online Learning: A Systematic Review and Bibliographic Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garg, Poonam & Gupta, Bhumika & Chauhan, Ajay Kumar & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Gupta, Shivam & Modgil, Sachin, 2021. "Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Chih-Hung Wu & Chien-Yu Liu, 2022. "Educational Applications of Non-Fungible Token (NFT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Mao Zhao & Wei Liu & Abu Naser Mohammad Saif & Bo Wang & Rasheda Akter Rupa & K. M. Anwarul Islam & S. M. Masudur Rahman & Nusrat Hafiz & Rehnuma Mostafa & Mohammad Anisur Rahman, 2023. "Blockchain in Online Learning: A Systematic Review and Bibliographic Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Boyu Liu & Xiameng Si & Haiyan Kang, 2022. "A Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Applications in Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    6. Sun, Yi & Jiang, Shiqing & Jia, Wanjiao & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Blockchain as a cutting-edge technology impacting business: A systematic literature review perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    7. Taehyun Ko & Jaeram Lee & Daehyeon Park & Doojin Ryu, 2023. "Supply chain transparency as a signal of ethical production," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1565-1573, April.
    8. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Kimani, Danson & Adams, Kweku & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Ullah, Subhan & Frecknall-Hughes, Jane & Kim, Ja, 2020. "Blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: Whence, whither, wherefore and how?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Elarbi Badidi, 2022. "Edge AI and Blockchain for Smart Sustainable Cities: Promise and Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Leon Goldsmith & Abdul Khalique Shaikh & Hacer Yildiz Tan & Kaamran Raahemifar, 2022. "A Review of Contemporary Governance Challenges in Oman: Can Blockchain Technology Be Part of Sustainable Solutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Jun Xiao & Yi Jiao & Yin Li & Zhujun Jiang, 2021. "Towards a Trusted and Unified Consortium-Blockchain-Based Data Sharing Infrastructure for Open Learning—TolFob Architecture and Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Fu, Zhengtang & Dong, Peiwu & Ju, Yanbing & Gan, Zhenkun & Zhu, Min, 2022. "An intelligent green vehicle management system for urban food reliably delivery:A case study of Shanghai, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    16. Milica Jevremović & Cătălin Gheorghiță & Vladimir Cerić & Ovidiu Blăjină & Zorica Jelić & Milena P. Ilić & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, 2022. "An Empirical Study on Website Interactivity Impact among a Student Group, Beneficent for Companies, and Other Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Kumar, Sourabh & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2023. "Exploring the hyperledger blockchain technology disruption and barriers of blockchain adoption in petroleum supply chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Ferdinand Thies & Sören Wallbach & Michael Wessel & Markus Besler & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Initial coin offerings and the cryptocurrency hype - the moderating role of exogenous and endogenous signals," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1691-1705, September.
    20. Michael J. Fell & Alexandra Schneiders & David Shipworth, 2019. "Consumer Demand for Blockchain-Enabled Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in the United Kingdom: An Online Survey Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5333-:d:804581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.