IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3353-d770033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pesticides Xenobiotics in Soil Ecosystem and Their Remediation Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Xingwen Wang

    (Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work, hence, consider as 1st authors.)

  • Muhammad Umair Sial

    (Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    These authors contributed equally to this work, hence, consider as 1st authors.)

  • Muhammad Amjad Bashir

    (College of Agriculture, Bahadur Sub-Campus Layyah, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
    These authors contributed equally to this work, hence, consider as 1st authors.)

  • Muhammad Bilal

    (Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Qurat-Ul-Ain Raza

    (Department of Soil Science, FAS&T, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Hafiz Muhammad Ali Raza

    (College of Agriculture, Bahadur Sub-Campus Layyah, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
    Department of Soil Science, FAS&T, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Abdur Rehim

    (College of Agriculture, Bahadur Sub-Campus Layyah, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
    Department of Soil Science, FAS&T, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Yucong Geng

    (Key Laboratory of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Globally, the rapid rise in the human population has increased the crop production, resulting in increased pesticide xenobiotics. Despite the fact that pesticide xenobiotics toxify the soil environment and ecosystem, synthetic pesticides have increased agricultural yields and reduced disease vectors. Pesticide use has increased, resulting in an increase in environmental pollution. Various methods of controlling and eliminating these contaminants have been proposed to address this issue. Pesticide impurity in the climate presents a genuine danger to individuals and other oceanic and earthly life. If not controlled, the pollution can prompt difficult issues for the climate. Some viable and cost-effective alternative approaches are needed to maintain this emission level at a low level. Phytoremediation and microbial remediation are effective methods for removing acaricide scrapings from the atmosphere using plants and organisms. This review gives an overview of different types of xenobiotics, how they get into the environment, and how the remediation of pesticides has progressed. It focuses on simple procedures that can be used in many countries. In addition, we have talked about the benefits and drawbacks of natural remediation methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingwen Wang & Muhammad Umair Sial & Muhammad Amjad Bashir & Muhammad Bilal & Qurat-Ul-Ain Raza & Hafiz Muhammad Ali Raza & Abdur Rehim & Yucong Geng, 2022. "Pesticides Xenobiotics in Soil Ecosystem and Their Remediation Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3353-:d:770033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3353/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3353/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyrone Hayes & Kelly Haston & Mable Tsui & Anhthu Hoang & Cathryn Haeffele & Aaron Vonk, 2002. "Feminization of male frogs in the wild," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6910), pages 895-896, October.
    2. Dijkgraaf, Elbert & Vollebergh, Herman R.J., 2004. "Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3-4), pages 233-247, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irina Gabriela Cara & Denis Țopa & Ioan Puiu & Gerard Jităreanu, 2022. "Biochar a Promising Strategy for Pesticide-Contaminated Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Patricia Mussali-Galante & María Luisa Castrejón-Godínez & José Antonio Díaz-Soto & Ángela Patricia Vargas-Orozco & Héctor Miguel Quiroz-Medina & Efraín Tovar-Sánchez & Alexis Rodríguez, 2023. "Biobeds, a Microbial-Based Remediation System for the Effective Treatment of Pesticide Residues in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Farhana Bibi & Azizur Rahman, 2023. "An Overview of Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture and Their Mitigation Strategies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maarten A. Allers & Corine Hoeben, 2010. "Effects of Unit-Based Garbage Pricing: A Differences-in-Differences Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(3), pages 405-428, March.
    2. Erik O'Donovan & Miche l L. Collins, 2011. "An Economic Evaluation of Incineration as a Residual Municipal Solid Waste Management Option in Ireland," Trinity Economics Papers tep1811, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    3. Shao-nan Shan & Xia Duan & Ting-ting Zhang & Yi Zhang & He Wang, 2021. "The impact of environmental benefits and institutional trust on residents’ willingness to participate in municipal solid waste treatment: a case study in Beijing, China [Burn or bury? A social cost," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 1170-1186.
    4. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Roberto Zoboli, 2008. "Waste Generation, Incineration and Landfill Diversion. De-coupling Trends, Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness in the EU," Working Papers 2008.94, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Shteryo Nozharov, 2023. "Social costs of circular economy in European Union," Post-Print hal-04307150, HAL.
    6. Broberg, Thomas & Dijkgraaf, Elbert & Meens-Eriksson, Sef, 2022. "Burn or let them bury? The net social cost of producing district heating from imported waste," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Valentina Iafolla & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Francesco Nicolli, 2010. "Rifiuti generati, rifiuti in discarica ed efficacia delle politiche ambientali in Europa," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 103-135.
    8. André, Francisco J. & Arguedas, Carmen & Rousseau, Sandra, 2024. "Strategic pricing, lifespan choices and environmental implications of peer-to-peer sharing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Münster, Marie & Meibom, Peter, 2011. "Optimization of use of waste in the future energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1612-1622.
    10. Valentina Iafolla & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Francesco Nicolli, 2010. "Are You SURE You Want to Waste Policy Chances? Waste Generation, Landfill Diversion and Environmental Policy Effectiveness in the EU15," Working Papers 2010.77, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Thomas C. Kinnaman & Masashi Yamamoto, 2023. "Has Incineration Replaced Recycling? Evidence from OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Baraldi, Anna Laura & Cantabene, Claudia & de Iudicibus, Alessandro & Fosco, Giovanni & iacopo, Grassi, 2025. "When Green Turns Costly: The Fiscal Fallout of EU Waste Management Funds in Italian Municipalities," MPRA Paper 125150, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Rob Aalbers & Herman Vollebergh, 2008. "An economic analysis of mixing wastes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 39(3), pages 311-330, March.
    14. Daniel Florentin, 2019. "From multi-utility to cross-utilities: The challenges of cross-sectoral entrepreneurial strategies in a German city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(11), pages 2242-2260, August.
    15. Margallo, M. & Dominguez-Ramos, A. & Aldaco, R. & Bala, A. & Fullana, P. & Irabien, A., 2014. "Environmental sustainability assessment in the process industry: A case study of waste-to-energy plants in Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 144-155.
    16. Shteryo Nozharov, 2018. "The Institutional Economics of Collective Waste Recovery Systems: an Empirical Investigation," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 172-180.
    17. Wagner, Jeffrey, 2011. "Incentivizing sustainable waste management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 585-594, February.
    18. Kinnaman, Thomas C. & Shinkuma, Takayoshi & Yamamoto, Masashi, 2014. "The socially optimal recycling rate: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 54-70.
    19. Grant E. Donnelly & Cait Lamberton & Rebecca Walker Reczek & Michael I. Norton, 2017. "Social Recycling Transforms Unwanted Goods into Happiness," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 48-63.
    20. Chokri Dridi & Naceur Khraief, 2011. "Mitigating Industrial Solid Waste in Tunisia: Landfill Use Vs. Recycling," Working Papers 590, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 Jan 2011.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3353-:d:770033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.