IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2788-d759953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongwei Zhang

    (School of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Lihui Wu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China)

  • Zhaoyun Wu

    (School of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Wenqiang Zhang

    (School of Information Science and Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Shun Jia

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Tao Peng

    (State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

Abstract

Low-carbon sustainable development has become the consensus of manufacturing enterprises to fulfill their social responsibilities. Facility layout is an essential part of manufacturing system planning. Current research has demonstrated the advantages of energy saving on the manufacturing system level where operational methods (e.g., energy-efficient production scheduling and path planning) can be utilized and do not require massive investment in the existing legacy system. However, these efforts are mostly based on the existing fixed facility layout. Meanwhile, although facility layout problems have been extensively studied so far, the related work seldom involves the optimization of energy consumption (EC) or other EC-related environmental impact indicators, and does not clearly reveal if EC can be an independent optimization objective in facility layout. Accordingly, whether the energy-saving potential of a manufacturing system can be further tapped through rational facility layout is the gap of the current study. To address this, an investigation into energy-saving oriented manufacturing workshop facility layout is conducted. Correspondingly, an energy-efficient facility layout (EFL) model for the multi-objective optimization problem that minimizes total load transport distance and EC is formulated, and a multi-objective particle swarm optimization-based method is proposed as the solution. Furthermore, experimental studies verify the effectiveness of the presented model and its solution, indicating that EC can be regarded as an independent optimization objective during facility layout, and EFL is a feasible energy-saving approach for a manufacturing system.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2788-:d:759953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jouko Seppänen & James M. Moore, 1970. "Facilities Planning with Graph Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 242-253, December.
    2. Heragu, Sunderesh S. & Kusiak, Andrew, 1991. "Efficient models for the facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Gordon C. Armour & Elwood S. Buffa, 1963. "A Heuristic Algorithm and Simulation Approach to Relative Location of Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 294-309, January.
    4. Chen, Lujie & Olhager, Jan & Tang, Ou, 2014. "Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 154-163.
    5. Matai, Rajesh, 2015. "Solving multi objective facility layout problem by modified simulated annealing," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 261(C), pages 302-311.
    6. Wang, Ruiqi & Zhao, Huan & Wu, Yan & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao & Liu, Mengxi, 2018. "An industrial facility layout design method considering energy saving based on surplus rectangle fill algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1038-1051.
    7. Akash Tayal & Angappa Gunasekaran & Surya Prakash Singh & Rameshwar Dubey & Thanos Papadopoulos, 2017. "Formulating and solving sustainable stochastic dynamic facility layout problem: a key to sustainable operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 621-655, June.
    8. Kothari, Ravi & Ghosh, Diptesh, 2013. "Tabu search for the single row facility layout problem using exhaustive 2-opt and insertion neighborhoods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 93-100.
    9. Yavuz A. Bozer & Russell D. Meller & Steven J. Erlebacher, 1994. "An Improvement-Type Layout Algorithm for Single and Multiple-Floor Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(7), pages 918-932, July.
    10. Anjos, Miguel F. & Vieira, Manuel V.C., 2017. "Mathematical optimization approaches for facility layout problems: The state-of-the-art and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Michael Scriabin & Roger C. Vergin, 1985. "A Cluster-Analytic Approach to Facility Layout," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 33-49, January.
    12. Kusiak, Andrew & Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1987. "The facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 229-251, June.
    13. Kuldeep Lamba & Ravi Kumar & Shraddha Mishra & Shubhangini Rajput, 2020. "Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 5-26, July.
    14. Asef-Vaziri, Ardavan & Jahandideh, Hossein & Modarres, Mohammad, 2017. "Loop-based facility layout design under flexible bay structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 713-725.
    15. Zvi Drezner, 1980. "DISCON: A New Method for the Layout Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1375-1384, December.
    16. Iqbal, Asif & Al-Ghamdi, Khalid A., 2018. "Energy-efficient cellular manufacturing system: Eco-friendly revamping of machine shop configuration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 863-872.
    17. Zhang, Shuai & Gajpal, Yuvraj & Appadoo, S.S. & Abdulkader, M.M.S., 2018. "Electric vehicle routing problem with recharging stations for minimizing energy consumption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 404-413.
    18. Hungerländer, Philipp & Anjos, Miguel F., 2015. "A semidefinite optimization-based approach for global optimization of multi-row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 46-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Li & Yali Chen & Jinzhao Song & Ming Li & Yu Yu, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization Method of Industrial Workshop Layout from the Perspective of Low Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Chong Wu & Jiahua Gan & Zhuo Jiang & Anding Jiang & Wenlong Zheng, 2022. "Ecological Efficiency Evaluation, Spatial Difference, and Trend Analysis of Logistics Industry and Manufacturing Industry Linkage in the Northeast Old Industrial Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, J. -Y. & Kim, Y. -D., 1995. "Graph theoretic heuristics for unequal-sized facility layout problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 391-401, August.
    2. Junqi Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Feng Chen & Silu Liu & Lixia Zhu, 2022. "A novel hybrid immune clonal selection algorithm for the constrained corridor allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 953-972, April.
    3. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    4. Ignacio Castillo & Thaddeus Sim, 2004. "A spring-embedding approach for the facility layout problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 73-81, January.
    5. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C. & Lin, Ting-li, 1995. "A heuristic procedure for the single-row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-73, November.
    6. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank, 2020. "Decorous combinatorial lower bounds for row layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 929-944.
    7. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    8. Kazuhiro Tsuchiya & Sunil Bharitkar & Yoshiyasu Takefuji, 1996. "A neural network approach to facility layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 556-563, March.
    9. Kuldeep Lamba & Ravi Kumar & Shraddha Mishra & Shubhangini Rajput, 2020. "Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 5-26, July.
    10. Anjos, Miguel F. & Vieira, Manuel V.C., 2017. "Mathematical optimization approaches for facility layout problems: The state-of-the-art and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafał Michalski, 2020. "Effects of scatter plot initial solutions on regular grid facility layout algorithms in typical production models," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 601-632, June.
    12. Dahlbeck, Mirko, 2021. "A mixed-integer linear programming approach for the T-row and the multi-bay facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 443-462.
    13. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Song, Xiang & Jones, Dylan & Akbari, Negar, 2017. "Layout optimisation for an installation port of an offshore wind farm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 67-83.
    14. Paul D. Dowling & R. F. Love, 1990. "Floor layouts using a multifacility location model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 945-952, December.
    15. Anjos, Miguel F. & Fischer, Anja & Hungerländer, Philipp, 2018. "Improved exact approaches for row layout problems with departments of equal length," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 514-529.
    16. Minhee Kim & Junjae Chae, 2019. "Monarch Butterfly Optimization for Facility Layout Design Based on a Single Loop Material Handling Path," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Lin, Jin-Ling & Foote, Bobbie & Pulat, Simin & Chang, Chir-Ho & Cheung, John Y., 1996. "Solving the failure-to-fit problem for plant layout: By changing department shapes and sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 135-146, February.
    18. Lee, Geun-Cheol & Kim, Yeong-Dae, 2000. "Algorithms for adjusting shapes of departments in block layouts on the grid-based plane," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.
    19. A. R. S. Amaral, 2022. "A heuristic approach for the double row layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1-36, September.
    20. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank & Hungerländer, Philipp & Maier, Kerstin, 2023. "Exact approaches for the combined cell layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 530-546.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2788-:d:759953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.