IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2749-d759257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance in the Italian Processed Tomato Value Chain: The Case for an Interbranch Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Samoggia

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Francesca Monticone

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Gianandrea Esposito

    (ART-ER, c/o CNR—Area della Ricerca di Bologna, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Collective action among producers is a corrective measure for power imbalance, which affects primary producers in agro-food supply chains. As associations of producers and processors, Interbranch Organisations (IBOs) promote dialogue, best practice, and market transparency. However, interbranch cooperation is still a less explored subject in agro-food governance studies. Therefore, the present paper aims to analyse the role of IBO North Italy for Processing Tomato (IBO NIPT) in the governance of the processed tomato value chain. The IBO for Processing Tomatoes of Northern Italy was chosen as a case study as it is one of the eight recognized IBOs in the country and Italy is the third biggest producer of tomatoes for processing worldwide. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in the processed tomato value chain were carried out to reach this aim. Abridged transcripts were analysed through thematic analysis by two or three researchers. The present study has three research steps: first, to explore the history of the IBO NIPT; second, to explore its current role as collective institution acting towards power imbalances; third, the IBO’s role in reference price streamlining. A multi-theoretical approach based on the following three theoretical frameworks was used to analyse the interviews: New Institutional Economics (NIE); Devaux’s framework for collective action; and Transaction Cost Economics. The paper highlights the role of local institutions in bringing innovations in the food supply chain and suggests that the future of IBOs in Italy has to be expanded beyond reference price streamlining and could benefit from the cooperation of retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Samoggia & Francesca Monticone & Gianandrea Esposito, 2022. "Governance in the Italian Processed Tomato Value Chain: The Case for an Interbranch Organisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2749-:d:759257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. M. Babb & S. A. Belden & C. R. Saathoff, 1969. "An Analysis of Cooperative Bargaining in the Processing Tomato Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(1), pages 13-25.
    2. Gaetano Martino & Daniela Toccaceli & Alessandro Pacciani & Michela Ascani, 2019. "The Interbranch organizations in the cap reform: Institutional nature, opportunities and limits," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(2), pages 315-334.
    3. Giulio Cainelli & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Sandro Montresor, 2012. "Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 697-734, November.
    4. Devaux, André & Horton, Douglas & Velasco, Claudio & Thiele, Graham & López, Gastón & Bernet, Thomas & Reinoso, Iván & Ordinola, Miguel, 2009. "Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 31-38, February.
    5. Poppy Nicol & Alice Taherzadeh, 2020. "Working Co-operatively for Sustainable and Just Food System Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Alessandro Bonanno & Carlo Russo & Luisa Menapace, 2018. "Market power and bargaining in agrifood markets: A review of emerging topics and tools," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 6-23, December.
    7. Luca Camanzi & Giorgia Bartoli & Beatrice Biondi & Giulio Malorgio, 2018. "A Structural-Functional Theory approach to vertical coordination in agri-food supply chains: Insights from the "Gran Suino Italiano" Inter-branch Organisation," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(2), pages 169-180.
    8. Menzani, Tito & Zamagni, Vera, 2010. "Cooperative Networks in the Italian Economy," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 98-127, March.
    9. Adele Coppola & Sara Ianuario, 2015. "Sustainability perceptions and actions of Italian agri-food firms," International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3/4), pages 205-220.
    10. Francesco Mantino & Barbara Forcina, 2018. "Market, Policies and Local Governance as Drivers of Environmental Public Benefits: The Case of the Localised Processed Tomato in Northern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lukáš Čechura & Antonella Samoggia & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2024. "Concentration, market imperfections, and interbranch organization in the Italian processed tomato supply chain," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 603-620, July.
    2. Dabasis Sharma & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Ismat Ara Begum & Shijun Ding & Andrew M. McKenzie, 2023. "A Value Chain Analysis of Cauliflower and Tomato in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Antonella Samoggia & Zeynep Beyhan, 2022. "Fairness-Enabling Practices in Agro-Food Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    2. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Silvia Sacchetti & Ermanno Tortia, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    4. Davide Castellani & Giovanni Marin & Sandro Montresor & Antonello Zanfei, 2020. "Foreign Direct Investments and Regional Specialization in Environmental Technologies," SEEDS Working Papers 0620, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Apr 2020.
    5. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:cp459_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Stéphane Lhuillery & Antoine Schoen, 2017. "The determinants of cleaner energy innovations of the world’s largest firms: the impact of firm learning and knowledge capital," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 311-333, May.
    8. Chiara Aleffi & Sabrina Tomasi & Concetta Ferrara & Cristina Santini & Gigliola Paviotti & Federica Baldoni & Alessio Cavicchi, 2020. "Universities and Wineries: Supporting Sustainable Development in Disadvantaged Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Koen Deconinck & Marion Jansen & Carla Barisone, 2023. "Fast and furious: the rise of environmental impact reporting in food systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1310-1337.
    10. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2021. "Firms’ growth, green gazelles and eco-innovation: evidence from a sample of European firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1721-1738, April.
    11. Michał Gazdecki & Grzegorz Leszczyński & Marek Zieliński, 2021. "Food Sector as an Interactive Business World: A Framework for Research on Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Schneider, Nathan, 2021. "Enabling Community-Owned Platforms: A Proposal for a Tech New Deal," OSF Preprints cp459, Center for Open Science.
    13. Marco-Lajara, B. & Úbeda-García, M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. & Manresa-Marhuenda, E., 2023. "The impact of international experience on firm economic performance. The double mediating effect of green knowledge acquisition & eco-innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Hendrik Hansmeier, 2021. "Geography of eco-innovations vis-à-vis geography of sustainability transitions: Two sides of the same coin?," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(07), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    15. Folwell, Raymond J. & Mittelhammer, Ronald C. & Wang, Q., 1998. "An Empirical Bargaining Model Of Price Discovery: An Application To The Washington/Oregon Asparagus Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(4), pages 1-13.
    16. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2019. "Academic Inventors and the Antecedents of Green Technologies. A Regional Analysis of Italian Patent Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 247-263.
    17. Gunnar Pippel, 2015. "R&D Collaboration For Environmental Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-22.
    18. Huong, Pham Thi Mai & Hau, Nguyen Van & Kaufmann, Brigitte & Valle-Zarate, Anne & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2009. "Emerging supply chains of indigenous pork and their impacts on small-scale farmers in upland areas of Vietnam," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51628, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska & Jan Fałkowski, 2019. "Farmers’ Bargaining Power and Input Prices: What Can We Learn from Self-Reported Assessments? 1," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Michał Gazdecki & Kamila Grześkowiak, 2025. "Does Financial Power Lead Farmers to Focus More on the Behavioral Factors of Business Relationships with Input Suppliers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    21. The WorldFish Center, 2011. "CGIAR Research Program. Aquatic agricultural systems. Program proposal," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 39556, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2749-:d:759257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.