IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15014-d971625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of High-Performance Work Systems on the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Ding

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 200235, China)

  • Yijun Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 200235, China)

Abstract

In the era of a knowledge economy, how to build an effective incentive system and to motivate the creativity of knowledge workers is extremely important to the long-term future of high-tech enterprises. However, a performance incentive system based on material incentives widely constructed by managers not only is difficult to generate in the long term and a significant incentive effect for knowledge workers but also brings heavy economic burden to enterprises. This paper constructs a high-performance work system (HPWS) that includes three variables: career growth, career calling and inclusive leadership. This study also discusses its effects on the innovation performance of knowledge workers, and examines the role of the craftsman spirit in the above-mentioned influence relationships. Based on the valid sample data of 364 knowledge workers from 14 different high-tech enterprises, the hierarchical regression analysis and the bootstrap analysis are used to analyze the data and to verify the relationship between the above-mentioned variables. The results show that: (1) Career growth, career calling and inclusive leadership can significantly improve the innovation performance of knowledge workers. (2) The craftsman spirit plays the part of an intermediary role in the above-mentioned influence relationships. (3) Career calling, inclusive leadership and their interaction can positively regulate the relationship between career growth and the craftsman spirit. Compared with previous studies, the purpose of this paper is to build a cross-level incentive system for knowledge workers from the perspective of non-material incentives, which effectively makes up for the deficiencies of material incentive system. Furthermore, the conclusion of this paper also provides practical suggestions for managers to better integrate the limited resources of enterprises to meet the multi-level needs of knowledge workers and to improve their innovation performance to the maximum extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Ding & Yijun Liu, 2022. "The Influence of High-Performance Work Systems on the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15014-:d:971625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Lamm & Jennifer Tosti-Kharas & Cynthia King, 2015. "Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 207-220, April.
    2. Tung Thanh Do, 2018. "How spirituality, climate and compensation affect job performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 396-409, June.
    3. Konshik Kim, 2021. "The Interplay Between The Social And Economic Human Resource Management Systems On Innovation Capability And Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(07), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Rentao Miao & Yi Cao, 2019. "High-Performance Work System, Work Well-Being, and Employee Creativity: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Chernyak-Hai, Lily & Rabenu, Edna, 2018. "The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 456-481, September.
    6. Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri, 2016. "A Model on Knowledge Workers Performance Evaluation," Review of Knowledge Economy, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13.
    7. Chieh-Peng Lin & Meng-Keng Tsai, 2020. "Strengthening long-term job performance: The moderating roles of sense of responsibility and leader’s support," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 134-152, February.
    8. Javed, Basharat & Abdullah, Iqra & Zaffar, Muhmmad Adeel & Haque, Adnan ul & Rubab, Ume, 2019. "Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 554-571, July.
    9. Yun-Hwa Chiang & Chu-Chun Hsu & Hsi-An Shih, 2015. "Erratum to: Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 825-825, September.
    10. Nouri, Hossein & Parker, Robert J., 2013. "Career growth opportunities and employee turnover intentions in public accounting firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 138-148.
    11. Margaret Moussa & Mathew Bright & Maria Estela Varua, 2017. "Investigating knowledge workers’ productivity using work design theory," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(6), pages 822-834, July.
    12. David Balkin & Patrice Roussel & Steve Werner, 2015. "Performance Contingent Pay and Autonomy: Implications for Facilitating Extra-Role Creativity," Post-Print halshs-01233616, HAL.
    13. Ye, Qingyan & Wang, Duanxu & Guo, Weixiao, 2019. "Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 468-480.
    14. Yun-Hwa Chiang & Chu-Chun Hsu & His-An Shih, 2015. "Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 531-549, June.
    15. Muhammad Ali Butt & Faisal Nawaz & Saddam Hussain & Maria José Sousa & Minhong Wang & Muhammad Saleem Sumbal & Muhammad Shujahat, 2019. "Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based sys," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 336-356, September.
    16. Mike Wright & Valentina Tartari & Kenneth G. Huang & Francesco Di Lorenzo & Janet Bercovitz, 2018. "Knowledge Worker Mobility in Context: Pushing the Boundaries of Theory and Methods," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baik, Kibok & Kim, Kyoung Yong & Patel, Pankaj C., 2019. "The internal ecosystem of high performance work system and employee service-providing capability: A contingency approach for servitizing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 402-410.
    2. Liu, Chih-Hsing, 2017. "The relationships among intellectual capital, social capital, and performance - The moderating role of business ties and environmental uncertainty," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 553-561.
    3. Mehtab Alam & Fu-Ren Lin, 2022. "Internalizing Sustainability into Research Practices of Higher Education Institutions: Case of a Research University in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Huong Le & Zhou Jiang & Ingrid Nielsen, 2018. "Cognitive Cultural Intelligence and Life Satisfaction of Migrant Workers: The Roles of Career Engagement and Social Injustice," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 237-257, August.
    5. Jee Young Seong & Inju Yang & Linyuan Zhang, 2023. "What Initiates Creativity in an Organization?: A Two-Horse Carriage of HRM and PO Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Wayu Eko Yudiatmaja & Roy Valiant Salomo & Eko Prasojo, 2023. "Fostering Innovative Behavior of Millennial Public Employee Through Leadership Styles and Organizational Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    7. Xiao-Yu Liu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2020. "Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 325-344, March.
    8. Jingli Li & Min Zhao & Guanjun Xia & Chao Liu, 2018. "The Relationship between Team Hometown Diversity and Team Creativity: From the Chinese Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Tuan, Luu Trong, 2020. "Coach humility and player creativity: The roles of knowledge sharing and group diversity," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 284-301.
    10. Imran Ahmed Shahzad & Valliapan Raju & Muhammad Farrukh & Nagina Kanwal & Muhammad Ikram, 2018. "Quality of Work Life: A Significant Dimension of Non-Financial Compensation or Managers’ Tool to Generate Reciprocity," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 218240-2182, December.
    11. Shu-Yuan Chen & Jin Feng Uen & Chih-Chan Chen, 2016. "Implementing high performance HR practices in Asia: HR practice consistency, employee roles, and performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 937-958, December.
    12. Yangxin Wang & Dora C. Lau, 2022. "How and why job crafting influences creative performance? A resource allocation explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1561-1587, December.
    13. Meng Xi & Yan Chen & Shuming Zhao, 2021. "The Role of employees’ perceptions of HPWS in the HPWS-performance relationship: A multilevel perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1113-1138, September.
    14. Rentao Miao & Yi Cao, 2019. "High-Performance Work System, Work Well-Being, and Employee Creativity: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Feng Liu & Jun Liu & He Ding, 2023. "Employee Strengths Mindset and Voice Behavior: The Roles of General Self-Efficacy and Leader–Member Exchange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Fahreen Alamgir & Hari Bapuji & Raza Mir, 2022. "Challenges and Insights from South Asia for Imagining Ethical Organizations: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 717-728, May.
    17. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    18. Rajeev K. Goel & Devrim Göktepe-Hultén, 2021. "Innovation by foreign researchers: relative influences of internal versus external human capital," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 258-276, February.
    19. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    20. Muhammad Sajjad Bashir & Sajid Haider & Muhammad Ali Asadullah & Munir Ahmed & Muhammad Sajjad, 2020. "Moderated Mediation Between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Commitment: The Role of Procedural Justice and Career Growth Opportunities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15014-:d:971625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.