IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v11y2018i03p456-481_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant?

Author

Listed:
  • Chernyak-Hai, Lily
  • Rabenu, Edna

Abstract

In this article, we argue that changes in workplace characteristics over the last few decades may affect work relationships and call for adjustments in the traditional theoretical framework used to understand them. Since the last quarter of the 20th century, there have been theories regarding changes in labor relationships following technological, political, globalization, and economical changes. However, we examine the changes in light of psychological theories rather than labor or industrial approaches. We review four main areas where social exchange theory (SET) has been implemented, address recent changes that challenge the traditional SET perspective, and propose alternative models. We refer to these models as “hybrid†as they integrate traditional SET premises with new-era workplace characteristics. First, we describe several changes in workplace characteristics. Next, we review some of the most conventional applications of SET to work relationships. Finally, we critically examine whether this theory meets the requirements of work relationships in the new world of work and conclude by arguing that SET needs to be adjusted to reflect the assumption that frequent changes in employee and organizational characteristics in the new workplaces require similar frequent adjustments in exchange relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Chernyak-Hai, Lily & Rabenu, Edna, 2018. "The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 456-481, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:456-481_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942618000056/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wissal Ben Arfi & Lubica Hikkerova, 2021. "Corporate entrepreneurship, product innovation, and knowledge conversion: the role of digital platforms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1191-1204, February.
    2. Zhang, Shihang & Moeckel, Rolf & Moreno, Ana Tsui & Shuai, Bin & Gao, Jie, 2020. "A work-life conflict perspective on telework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 51-68.
    3. João Vasco Coelho, 2022. "Recruiting Business Expatriates in Portugal: The Moderating Role of Employee Willingness," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 8(2), pages 206-227, July.
    4. Sanmugam Annamalah & Kalisri Logeswaran Aravindan & Murali Raman & Pradeep Paraman, 2022. "SME Engagement with Open Innovation: Commitments and Challenges towards Collaborative Innovation," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Helena Bulinska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagienska & Yasangi Anuradha Iddagoda, 2021. "The Mediating Role of Social Media in the Relationship between Perceived Leadership Support and Employee Engagement in Banking," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 851-874.
    6. Junlong Peng & Qi Zhang, 2022. "Safety Performance Assessment of Construction Sites under the Influence of Psychological Factors: An Analysis Based on the Extension Cloud Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Matthias Gotsch & Carsten Gandenberger & Luisa Serafimov & Mathias Miemiec, 2023. "Top‐down and bottom‐up strategies for the implementation of corporate social responsibility: A qualitative survey of an international IT services company," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1645-1663, July.
    8. Francis Donkor & William Ansah Appienti & Ellen Achiaah, 2022. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership Style on Employee Turnover Intention in State-Owned Enterprises in Ghana. The Mediating Role of Organisational Commitment," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Neil B. Barnard & Sebastiaan Rothmann & Leon T. De Beer & Welma Lubbe, 2023. "Emergency Nurses’ Job Demands-Resources Profiles and Capabilities: Effects on Performance and Intention to Leave," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Yu Ding & Yijun Liu, 2022. "The Influence of High-Performance Work Systems on the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Akriti Gupta & Aman Chadha & Vijayshri Tiwari & Arup Varma & Vijay Pereira, 2023. "Sustainable training practices: predicting job satisfaction and employee behavior using machine learning techniques," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 1913-1936, November.
    12. Bassam Buhusayen & Pi-Shen Seet & Alan Coetzer, 2021. "Front-Line Management during Radical Organisational Change: Social Exchange and Paradox Interpretations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    13. Sheikh Muhamad Hizam & Habiba Akter & Ilham Sentosa & Waqas Ahmed & Mohamad Noorman Masrek & Jawad Ali, 2023. "Predicting Workforce Engagement towards Digital Transformation through a Multi-Analytical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Wayu Eko Yudiatmaja & Roy Valiant Salomo & Eko Prasojo, 2023. "Fostering Innovative Behavior of Millennial Public Employee Through Leadership Styles and Organizational Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    15. Di Wu & Zhongming Wang, 2020. "Be Careful How You Do It: The Distinct Effects of Observational Monitoring and Interactional Monitoring on Employee Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-10, July.
    16. Latorre, Felisa & Ramos, José & Gracia, Francisco J. & Tomás, Inés, 2020. "How high-commitment HRM relates to PC violation and outcomes: The mediating role of supervisor support and PC fulfilment at individual and organizational levels," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 462-476.
    17. Kerry Anne London & Tanya Meade & Craig McLachlan, 2022. "Healthier Construction: Conceptualising Transformation of Mental Health Outcomes through an Integrated Supply Chain Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Francis Donkor & Zhou Dongmei & Isaac Sekyere, 2021. "The Mediating Effects of Organizational Commitment on Leadership Styles and Employee Performance in SOEs in Ghana: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:456-481_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.