IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12430-d929486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Is Building Sustainability Understood?—A Study of Research Papers and Sustainability Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Raine Isaksson

    (Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Max Rosvall

    (Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Maximilian Espuny

    (Production Department, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil)

  • Thais Vieira Nunhes

    (Production Department, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil)

  • Otávio José de Oliveira

    (Production Department, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, Brazil)

Abstract

The global process of providing shelter plays an important role in sustainable development. Buildings are estimated to be responsible for up to 50% of global carbon emissions, which makes building a major issue for climate change. The common saying is that what “we cannot measure, we cannot improve”. This assumes that we know what to measure, which requires that we have a common understanding. The indication is that there could be problems in how we understand building sustainability, which, if true, will reduce change towards sustainable building. The purpose of this paper is to assess how building sustainability is understood in building research and building practice. The research approach is to review how building researchers and building companies have interpreted sustainability in leading articles and in leading sustainability reports. These are assessed by studying how sustainability is described and then in more detail applying two maturity matrices on the articles and the reports. The preliminary results indicate that there could be a major problem in understanding sustainability among both building researchers and building company managers, which could constitute a significant obstacle to improving building sustainability. This might not only be related to building sustainability but could be a general problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Raine Isaksson & Max Rosvall & Maximilian Espuny & Thais Vieira Nunhes & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2022. "How Is Building Sustainability Understood?—A Study of Research Papers and Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12430-:d:929486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raine Isaksson, 2021. "How Could Sustainability and Sustainable Development be Understood based on a Stakeholder Needs Focus? A Preliminary Suggestion," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park & Jens J Dahlgaard (ed.), Key Challenges and Opportunities for Quality, Sustainability and Innovation in the FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION Quality and Service Management in the , chapter 15, pages 309-332, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Maximilian Espuny & Thalita Lauá Reis Campos & Gilberto Santos & Merce Bernardo & Otávio José Oliveira, 2022. "Guidelines to build the bridge between sustainability and integrated management systems: A way to increase stakeholder engagement toward sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1617-1635, September.
    3. George Baird, 2009. "Incorporating User Performance Criteria into Building Sustainability Rating Tools (BSRTs) for Buildings in Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Qiance Liu & Litao Liu & Xiaojie Liu & Shenggong Li & Gang Liu, 2021. "Building stock dynamics and the impact of construction bubble and bust on employment in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1631-1643, December.
    5. Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Johan Rockström & Will Steffen & Kevin Noone & Åsa Persson & F. Stuart Chapin & Eric F. Lambin & Timothy M. Lenton & Marten Scheffer & Carl Folke & Hans Joachim Schellnhuber & Björn Nykvist & Cynthia , 2009. "A safe operating space for humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7263), pages 472-475, September.
    7. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    8. Pedro Nuñez-Cacho & Jaroslaw Górecki & Valentín Molina-Moreno & Francisco A. Corpas-Iglesias, 2018. "What Gets Measured, Gets Done: Development of a Circular Economy Measurement Scale for Building Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Enzo Viviani Garcia & Maximilian Espuny & Vitor Homem de Mello Santos & Raine Isaksson & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2021. "Where to Go with Corporate Sustainability? Opening Paths for Sustainable Businesses through the Collaboration between Universities, Governments, and Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, January.
    10. José Salvador da Motta Reis & Maximilian Espuny & Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Nilo Antonio de Souza Sampaio & Raine Isaksson & Fernando Celso de Campos & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2021. "Striding towards Sustainability: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mircea Raul Tudorica & Mihaela Teodora Toadere & Corneliu Ioan Bob, 2023. "The Sustainability Study Done for a Consolidation Work on a Historical Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Luisa María Gil-Martín & Luisa Hdz-Gil & Emilio Molero & Enrique Hernández-Montes, 2023. "The Relationship between Concrete Strength and Classes of Resistance against Corrosion Induced by Carbonation: A Proposal for the Design of Extremely Durable Structures in Accordance with Eurocode 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Igor Labuda & Federica Pugliese & Jolanata Dzwierzynska, 2024. "An Innovative Concept for 3D Sand-Printed Sustainable Refugee Shelters in a Sandy Desert in a Hot and Dry Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Łukasz Mazur & Anatolii Olenchuk, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment and Building Information Modeling Integrated Approach: Carbon Footprint of Masonry and Timber-Frame Constructions in Single-Family Houses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Tian Zhu & Guangchen Liu, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Methodology to Study the Risk Management of Prefabricated Building Supply Chains: An Outlook for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    2. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    3. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    4. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Virág, Doris & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Baumgart, André & Matej, Sarah & Krausmann, Fridolin & Min, Jihoon & Rao, Narasimha D. & Haberl, Helmut, 2022. "How much infrastructure is required to support decent mobility for all? An exploratory assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Child, Michael & Koskinen, Otto & Linnanen, Lassi & Breyer, Christian, 2018. "Sustainability guardrails for energy scenarios of the global energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 321-334.
    7. Kristin Linnerud & Erling Holden & Morten Simonsen, 2021. "Closing the sustainable development gap: A global study of goal interactions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 738-753, July.
    8. Garver, Geoffrey, 2019. "A Systems-based Tool for Transitioning to Law for a Mutually Enhancing Human-Earth Relationship," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 165-174.
    9. Emily Webster, 2022. "Regulating humanity's impact on the earth: The promise of transnational environmental law," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S3), pages 38-48, December.
    10. McGrath, Simon & Powell, Lesley, 2016. "Skills for sustainable development: Transforming vocational education and training beyond 2015," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 12-19.
    11. Nessa Winston, 2022. "Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 191-202, February.
    12. Raphaela Helbig & Sven von Höveling & Andreas Solsbach & Jorge Marx Gómez, 2021. "Strategic analysis of providing corporate sustainability open data," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 195-214, July.
    13. Ribas, Aline & Lucena, André F.P. & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2017. "Bridging the energy divide and securing higher collective well-being in a climate-constrained world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 435-450.
    14. Łuczak, Aleksandra & Just, Małgorzata, 2021. "Sustainable development of territorial units: MCDM approach with optimal tail selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    15. Mauerhofer, V. & Ichinose, T. & Blackwell, B.D. & Willig, M.R. & Flint, C.G. & Krause, M.S. & Penker, ​M., 2018. "Underuse of social-ecological systems: A research agenda for addressing challenges to biocultural diversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 57-64.
    16. Neill, Andrew M. & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Stout, Jane C., 2022. "Conceptual integration of ecosystem services and natural capital within Irish national policy: An analysis over time and between policy sectors," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Milligan, Ben & O'Keeffe, Michelle, 2019. "Global Governance of Resources and Implications for Resource Efficiency in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 46-58.
    18. Winkler, Klara J. & Scown, Murray W. & Nicholas, Kimberly A., 2018. "A classification to align social-ecological land systems research with policy in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 137-145.
    19. Diane Pearson & Julian Gorman & Richard Aspinall, 2022. "Multiple Roles for Landscape Ecology in Future Farming Systems: An Editorial Overview," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, February.
    20. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021. "Responsible Resource Management in Remanufacturing—Framework for Qualitative Assessment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12430-:d:929486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.