IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9700-d882043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regulatory Perspectives to China’s Emerging Hydrogen Economy: Characteristics, Challenges, and Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Max Zhang

    (Law School, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Xiaonan Yang

    (Law School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

Abstract

Culminating two decades of industrial planning, China is now officially moving full steam ahead towards realizing a hydrogen economy under the country’s first ever Medium and Long-term Plan of the Hydrogen Industry (2021–2035). Among the relevant benchmarks established is the goal of developing a regulatory framework by 2025. This raises the question of how best to achieve a regulatory framework for China’s emerging hydrogen economy. To answer this question, the discussions of this paper are further broken-down and organized across four independent, but correlated, academic questions. One, relying on the fragmented authoritarianism model, what are the impacts of China’s current model of industrial development on an emerging regulated industry? Two, through a scientific and technological review, what are the characteristics of the hydrogen supply-chain most likely to present a regulatory challenge for China? Three, by analogy to the comparable experiences of China’s other regulated industries, what are the possible regulatory solutions? Four, and most importantly, how best to reconcile the findings to the above questions as they relate to the regulatory challenge of developing China’s emerging hydrogen economy. The results of the discussions reveal, that not all policy solutions and recommendations to the regulatory framework of the hydrogen economy should be treated equally. Rather, an integrated view of the core academic question revealed a procedural relationship among the regulatory solutions identified from the analysis above. Therefore, recognizing that each solution should synergize and correspond to different phases of regulatory development, a three-step regulatory pathway towards the hydrogen economy is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Zhang & Xiaonan Yang, 2022. "The Regulatory Perspectives to China’s Emerging Hydrogen Economy: Characteristics, Challenges, and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9700-:d:882043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pollitt, M. & Yang, C-H. & Chen, H., 2017. "Reforming the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector: Lessons from International Experience," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1713, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Sven Heim & Bastian Krieger & Mario Liebensteiner, 2020. "Unbundling, Regulation, and Pricing: Evidence from Electricity Distribution," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(1_suppl), pages 93-118, June.
    3. Zhang, M. & Yang, X.N., 2021. "Administrative framework barriers to energy storage development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Shin, Jungwoo & Hwang, Won-Sik & Choi, Hyundo, 2019. "Can hydrogen fuel vehicles be a sustainable alternative on vehicle market?: Comparison of electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 239-248.
    5. Michael Murphree & Dan Breznitz, 2018. "Indigenous digital technology standards for development: The case of China," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 234-252, December.
    6. Kothari, Richa & Buddhi, D. & Sawhney, R.L., 2008. "Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 553-563, February.
    7. Katrin Hussinger & Franz Schwiebacher, 2015. "The Market Value of Technology Disclosures to Standard Setting Organizations," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 321-344, May.
    8. Zhang, Hao, 2019. "Antinomic policy-making under the fragmented authoritarianism: Regulating China’s electricity sector through the energy-climate-environment dimension," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 162-169.
    9. Lin, Li-Wen, 2017. "A Network Anatomy of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 583-600, October.
    10. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    11. Ren, Jingzheng & Gao, Suzhao & Tan, Shiyu & Dong, Lichun & Scipioni, Antonio & Mazzi, Anna, 2015. "Role prioritization of hydrogen production technologies for promoting hydrogen economy in the current state of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1217-1229.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucian-Ioan Dulău, 2023. "CO 2 Emissions of Battery Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Fu, Tong & Jian, Ze, 2020. "A developmental state: How to allocate electricity efficiently in a developing country," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Kothari, Richa & Singh, D.P. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2012. "Fermentative hydrogen production – An alternative clean energy source," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2337-2346.
    4. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    5. Chen, Hao & Cui, Jian & Song, Feng & Jiang, Zhigao, 2022. "Evaluating the impacts of reforming and integrating China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Freida Ozavize Ayodele & Siti Indati Mustapa & Bamidele Victor Ayodele & Norsyahida Mohammad, 2020. "An Overview of Economic Analysis and Environmental Impacts of Natural Gas Conversion Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Zhang, Sufang & Andrews-Speed, Philip & Li, Sitao, 2018. "To what extent will China's ongoing electricity market reforms assist the integration of renewable energy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 165-172.
    8. Adrian Neacsa & Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Cașen Panaitescu & Doru Bogdan Stoica & Bogdan Ionete & Alina Prundurel & Sorin Gal, 2023. "Hydrogen–Natural Gas Mix—A Viable Perspective for Environment and Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-38, August.
    9. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Accountability, inclusivity, effectiveness, and leaving no one behind: An exploration of effective governance principles in ensuring clean water and sanitation in South African municipalities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 191-205, December.
    10. Jia, Wenjian & Jiang, Zhiqiu & Wang, Qian & Xu, Bin & Xiao, Mei, 2023. "Preferences for zero-emission vehicle attributes: Comparing early adopters with mainstream consumers in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 21-32.
    11. Roberto Cardinale, 2022. "State-Owned Enterprises’ Reforms and their Implications for the Resilience and Vulnerability of the Chinese Economy: Evidence from the Banking, Energy and Telecom Sectors," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 489-514, September.
    12. Blind, Knut & Krieger, Bastian & Pellens, Maikel, 2022. "The interplay between product innovation, publishing, patenting and developing standards," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    13. Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne & Rocha, Augusto & Rowe, Alex, 2025. "Looking inside the ‘black box’ of digital firm scaling: An ethnographically informed conceptualisation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Adel Ben Youssef, 2025. "Twin Transition: Digital Transformation Pathways for Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-28, October.
    15. Nithin Isaac & Akshay Kumar Saha, 2023. "Analysis of Refueling Behavior Models for Hydrogen-Fuel Vehicles: Markov versus Generalized Poisson Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Adelina Zeqiri & Adel Ben Youssef & Teja Maherzi Zahar, 2025. "The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Hafizi, A. & Rahimpour, M.R. & Hassanajili, Sh., 2016. "Hydrogen production via chemical looping steam methane reforming process: Effect of cerium and calcium promoters on the performance of Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 685-694.
    18. Anja Lambrecht & Carsten Baumgarth & Jörg Henseler, 2025. "Holistic augmented reality brand equity (HARBE) model: building customer-based brand equity through augmented reality," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(4), pages 298-314, July.
    19. Manyise, Timothy & Dentoni, Domenico, 2021. "Value chain partnerships and farmer entrepreneurship as balancing ecosystem services: Implications for agri-food systems resilience," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    20. Kendall Park & Steve Hoeffler & Kevin Lane Keller, 2023. "Marketing perspectives on CSR initiatives: Conceptual foundations and an agenda for future research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 277-296, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9700-:d:882043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.