IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4873-d543966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local and Application-Specific Geodemographics for Data-Led Urban Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Otley

    (School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK)

  • Michelle Morris

    (Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK)

  • Andy Newing

    (School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK)

  • Mark Birkin

    (School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK)

Abstract

This work seeks to introduce improvements to the traditional variable selection procedures employed in the development of geodemographic classifications. It presents a proposal for shifting from a traditional approach for generating general-purpose one-size-fits-all geodemographic classifications to application-specific classifications. This proposal addresses the recent scepticism towards the utility of general-purpose applications by employing supervised machine learning techniques in order to identify contextually relevant input variables from which to develop geodemographic classifications with increased discriminatory power. A framework introducing such techniques in the variable selection phase of geodemographic classification development is presented via a practical use-case that is focused on generating a geodemographic classification with an increased capacity for discriminating the propensity for Library use in the UK city of Leeds. Two local classifications are generated for the city, one a general-purpose classification, and the other, an application-specific classification incorporating supervised Feature Selection methods in the selection of input variables. The discriminatory power of each classification is evaluated and compared, with the result successfully demonstrating the capacity for the application-specific approach to generate a more contextually relevant result, and thus underpins increasingly targeted public policy decision making, particularly in the context of urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Otley & Michelle Morris & Andy Newing & Mark Birkin, 2021. "Local and Application-Specific Geodemographics for Data-Led Urban Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4873-:d:543966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Batey & Peter Brown, 2007. "The Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy Initiatives: A Geodemographic Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2774-2793, November.
    2. Chris Brunsdon & Paul Longley & Alex Singleton & David Ashby, 2011. "Predicting participation in higher education: a comparative evaluation of the performance of geodemographic classifications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 17-30, January.
    3. Cathy Maugis & Gilles Celeux & Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette, 2009. "Variable Selection for Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 701-709, September.
    4. Alexander D. Singleton & Paul A. Longley, 2009. "Creating open source geodemographics: Refining a national classification of census output areas for applications in higher education," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 643-666, August.
    5. Dan Vickers & Phil Rees, 2007. "Creating the UK National Statistics 2001 output area classification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 379-403, March.
    6. Jakob Petersen & Maurizio Gibin & Paul Longley & Pablo Mateos & Philip Atkinson & David Ashby, 2011. "Geodemographics as a tool for targeting neighbourhoods in public health campaigns," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 173-192, June.
    7. Richard Harris & Ron Johnston & Simon Burgess, 2007. "Neighborhoods, Ethnicity and School Choice: Developing a Statistical Framework for Geodemographic Analysis," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 26(5), pages 553-579, December.
    8. Moon, Graham & Twigg, Liz & Jones, Kelvyn & Aitken, Grant & Taylor, Joanna, 2019. "The utility of geodemographic indicators in small area estimates of limiting long-term illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 47-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Brunsdon & Paul Longley & Alex Singleton & David Ashby, 2011. "Predicting participation in higher education: a comparative evaluation of the performance of geodemographic classifications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 17-30, January.
    2. A. Singleton & A. Wilson & O. O’Brien, 2012. "Geodemographics and spatial interaction: an integrated model for higher education," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 223-241, April.
    3. Peter Fisher & Nicholas J Tate, 2015. "Modelling Class Uncertainty in the Geodemographic Output Area Classification," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(3), pages 541-563, June.
    4. Alex D Singleton, 2010. "The Geodemographics of Educational Progression and their Implications for Widening Participation in Higher Education," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2560-2580, November.
    5. Richard Harris & Yingyu Feng, 2016. "Putting the geography into geodemographics: Using multilevel modelling to improve neighbourhood targeting – a case study of Asian pupils in London," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(2), pages 93-107, July.
    6. George Grekousis & Thomas Hatzichristos, 2013. "Fuzzy Clustering Analysis in Geomarketing Research," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(1), pages 95-116, February.
    7. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Tunstall, Rebecca & Harris, Richard, 2011. "Place typologies and their policy applications: a report prepared for the Department of Communities and Local Government," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43805, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Alex Fenton & Rich Harris & Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2011. "Place Typologies and their Policy Applications," CASE Reports casereport65, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Hache, Emmanuel & Leboullenger, Déborah & Mignon, Valérie, 2017. "Beyond average energy consumption in the French residential housing market: A household classification approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-95.
    10. Stephen Clark & Nik Lomax & Mark Birkin, 2020. "A classification for English primary schools using open data," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 7, pages 1-13.
    11. Bardsley, Nicholas & Büchs, Milena & James, Patrick & Papafragkou, Anastasios & Rushby, Thomas & Saunders, Clare & Smith, Graham & Wallbridge, Rebecca & Woodman, Nicholas, 2019. "Domestic thermal upgrades, community action and energy saving: A three-year experimental study of prosperous households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 475-485.
    12. Clark, Stephen & Birkin, Mark & Lomax, Nik & Morris, Michelle, 2020. "Developing a whole systems obesity classification for the UK Biobank Cohort," OSF Preprints 7nqgd, Center for Open Science.
    13. Luca Scrucca, 2014. "Graphical tools for model-based mixture discriminant analysis," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(2), pages 147-165, June.
    14. Maugis, C. & Celeux, G. & Martin-Magniette, M.-L., 2011. "Variable selection in model-based discriminant analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1374-1387, November.
    15. Alessandro Casa & Andrea Cappozzo & Michael Fop, 2022. "Group-Wise Shrinkage Estimation in Penalized Model-Based Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 648-674, November.
    16. Wang, Ketong & Porter, Michael D., 2018. "Optimal Bayesian clustering using non-negative matrix factorization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 395-411.
    17. Federico Benassi & Marica D'Elia & Francesca Petrei, 2021. "The “meso” dimension of territorial capital: Evidence from Italy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 159-175, February.
    18. Alex Fenton, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," CASE Papers case173, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    19. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Kitty Lymperopoulou, 2020. "Immigration and Ethnic Diversity in England and Wales Examined Through an Area Classification Framework," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 829-846, September.
    21. Holt, Alison R. & Mears, Meghann & Maltby, Lorraine & Warren, Philip, 2015. "Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 33-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4873-:d:543966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.