IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4332-d535389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Mode Choice with Travel Behavior by Using Logit Model Based on Utility Function

Author

Listed:
  • Wissam Qassim Al-Salih

    (Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), 1119 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Domokos Esztergár-Kiss

    (Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), 1119 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

The currently available transport modeling tools are used to evaluate the effects of behavior change. The aim of this study is to analyze the interaction between the transport mode choice and travel behavior of an individual—more specifically, to identify which of the variables has the greatest effect on mode choice. This is realized by using a multinomial logit model (MNL) and a nested logit model (NL) based on a utility function. The utility function contains activity characteristics, trip characteristics including travel cost, travel time, the distance between activity place, and the individual characteristics to calculate the maximum utility of the mode choice. The variables in the proposed model are tested by using real observations in Budapest, Hungary as a case study. When analyzing the results, it was found that “Trip distance” variable was the most significant, followed by “Travel time” and “Activity purpose”. These parameters have to be mainly considered when elaborating urban traffic models and travel plans. The advantage of using the proposed logit models and utility function is the ability to identify the relationship among the travel behavior of an individual and the mode choice. With the results, it is possible to estimate the influence of the various variables on mode choice and identify the best mode based on the utility function.

Suggested Citation

  • Wissam Qassim Al-Salih & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "Linking Mode Choice with Travel Behavior by Using Logit Model Based on Utility Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4332-:d:535389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baltas, George & Doyle, Peter, 2001. "Random utility models in marketing research: a survey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 115-125, February.
    2. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Koppelman, Frank S., 2001. "The generalized nested logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 627-641, August.
    3. Joh, Chang-Hyeon & Arentze, Theo & Hofman, Frank & Timmermans, Harry, 2002. "Activity pattern similarity: a multidimensional sequence alignment method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 385-403, June.
    4. Marcel Paulssen & Dirk Temme & Akshay Vij & Joan Walker, 2014. "Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 873-888, July.
    5. Bowman, J. L. & Ben-Akiva, M. E., 2001. "Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Bhat, Chandra R., 1995. "A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 471-483, December.
    7. Chandra Bhat & Ram Pendyala, 2005. "Modeling intra-household interactions and group decision-making," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 443-448, September.
    8. Pasquale A. Pellegrini & A. Stewart Fotheringham & Ge Lin, 1997. "An Empirical Evaluation Of Parameter Sensitivity To Choice Set Definition In Shopping Destination Choice Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 257-284, April.
    9. Ye, Xin & Pendyala, Ram M. & Gottardi, Giovanni, 2007. "An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 96-113, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maxwell Umunna Nwachukwu & Clement Obinna & Uloma Jiburum & Donald Chiuba Okeke, 2023. "Analysis of Modal Split of Intra-urban Trips in a Centenary City: A Case Study of Enugu, Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    2. Rim Rejeb & Hélène Bouscasse & Sandrine Mathy & Carole Treibich, 2023. "Determinants of the social acceptability of Low Emission Zones (LEZ) in France: the case of the future LEZ in Grenoble," Working Papers 2023-02, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    3. Lingjuan Chen & Yijing Zhao & Zupeng Liu & Xinran Yang, 2022. "Construction of Commuters’ Multi-Mode Choice Model Based on Public Transport Operation Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Hui Zhang & Li Zhang & Yanjun Liu & Lele Zhang, 2023. "Understanding Travel Mode Choice Behavior: Influencing Factors Analysis and Prediction with Machine Learning Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Ignacio Escañuela Romana & Mercedes Torres-Jiménez & Mariano Carbonero-Ruz, 2023. "Elasticities of Passenger Transport Demand on US Intercity Routes: Impact on Public Policies for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Anna Eliza Wolnowska & Lech Kasyk, 2022. "Transport Preferences of City Residents in the Context of Urban Mobility and Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-32, August.
    7. Rim Rejeb & Hélène Bouscasse & Sandrine Mathy & Carole Treibich, 2023. "Determinants of the social acceptability of Low Emission Zones (LEZ) in France: the case of the future LEZ in Grenoble [Les déterminants de l’acceptabilité sociale des ZFE en France : le cas de la ," Working Papers hal-03996727, HAL.
    8. Oluwayemi-Oniya Aderibigbe & Trynos Gumbo, 2022. "Variations in Mode Choice of Residents Prior and during COVID-19: An Empirical Evidence from Johannesburg, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Haolun & Yin, Guosheng, 2018. "Boosting conditional logit model," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 48-63.
    2. Wissam Qassim Al-Salih & Domokos Esztergár Kiss, 2022. "Activity Chains Modelling of Travellers by Using Logit Models Based on the Utility Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, March.
    3. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    4. Li, Zhibin & Wang, Wei & Yang, Chen & Jiang, Guojun, 2013. "Exploring the causal relationship between bicycle choice and trip chain pattern," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 170-177.
    5. Florian Heiss & Stephan Hetzenecker & Maximilian Osterhaus, 2019. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Random Coefficients Model: An Elastic Net Approach," Papers 1909.08434, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    6. Mohammad Hesam Hafezi & Lei Liu & Hugh Millward, 2019. "A time-use activity-pattern recognition model for activity-based travel demand modeling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1369-1394, August.
    7. Tsoleridis, Panagiotis & Choudhury, Charisma F. & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Utilising activity space concepts to sampling of alternatives for mode and destination choice modelling of discretionary activities," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    8. Harsh Shah & Andre L. Carrel & Huyen T. K. Le, 2024. "Impacts of teleworking and online shopping on travel: a tour-based analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 99-127, February.
    9. Joseph F. Wyer, 2018. "Urban Transportation Mode Choice And Trip Complexity: Bicyclists Stick To Their Gears," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(3), pages 1777-1787, July.
    10. Yang, Liya & Shen, Qing & Li, Zhibin, 2016. "Comparing travel mode and trip chain choices between holidays and weekdays," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 273-285.
    11. Michael Duncan, 2016. "How much can trip chaining reduce VMT? A simplified method," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 643-659, July.
    12. Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2017. "Dynamic travel mode searching and switching analysis considering hidden model preference and behavioral decision processes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 511-532, May.
    13. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng & Liu, Hao & Yang, Y. Jeffrey, 2019. "Bi-level optimization approach for configuring population and employment distributions with minimized vehicle travel demand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 161-172.
    14. Simona Rasciute & Sean Puckett & Eric J. Pentecost, 2015. "The Allocation Of Oecd Direct Investment Between Ceecs: A Discrete Choice Approach," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(S1), pages 26-39, December.
    15. Huang, Arthur & Levinson, David, 2017. "A model of two-destination choice in trip chains with GPS data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 51-62.
    16. Siyu Li & Der-Horng Lee, 2017. "Learning daily activity patterns with probabilistic grammars," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 49-68, January.
    17. Zhang, Junyi & Kuwano, Masashi & Lee, Backjin & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2009. "Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 230-250, February.
    18. Tinessa, Fiore, 2021. "Closed-form random utility models with mixture distributions of random utilities: Exploring finite mixtures of qGEV models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 262-288.
    19. Abbe, E. & Bierlaire, M. & Toledo, T., 2007. "Normalization and correlation of cross-nested logit models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 795-808, August.
    20. Dröes, Martijn I. & Rietveld, Piet, 2015. "Rail-based public transport and urban spatial structure: The interplay between network design, congestion and urban form," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 421-439.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4332-:d:535389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.