IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2097-d500133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adding Technology Sustainability Evaluation to Product Development: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Model

Author

Listed:
  • André Souza Oliveira

    (SENAI CIMATEC, SENAI Innovation Institute—Forming and Materials Joining, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil
    SENAI CIMATEC, Manufacturing and Technology Integrated Campus, University Center SENAI CIMATEC, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil)

  • Bruno Caetano dos Santos Silva

    (SENAI CIMATEC, SENAI Innovation Institute—Forming and Materials Joining, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil
    SENAI CIMATEC, Manufacturing and Technology Integrated Campus, University Center SENAI CIMATEC, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil)

  • Cristiano Vasconcellos Ferreira

    (Technological Center of Joinville, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rua Dona Francisca, 8300, Zona Industrial Norte, Joinville, SC 89219-600, Brazil)

  • Renelson Ribeiro Sampaio

    (SENAI CIMATEC, Manufacturing and Technology Integrated Campus, University Center SENAI CIMATEC, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil)

  • Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado

    (SENAI CIMATEC, Manufacturing and Technology Integrated Campus, University Center SENAI CIMATEC, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Santiago Coelho

    (SENAI CIMATEC, SENAI Innovation Institute—Forming and Materials Joining, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil
    SENAI CIMATEC, Manufacturing and Technology Integrated Campus, University Center SENAI CIMATEC, Av. Orlando Gomes, 1845 Piatã, Salvador, BA 41650-010, Brazil)

Abstract

In the current world scenario, which is experiencing the arrival of new technologies, Industry 4.0, increased mobility and a pandemic environment, the achievement of sustainability demands proactive solutions. One of these actions includes the design of sustainable products. Several authors have studied the scientific discipline of Life Cycle Engineering (LCE), which encompasses environmental, social and economic dimensions. However, current LCE models have gaps, such as the need to incorporate a more holistic view, uncertainty and integrated analysis. In this context, the aim of this paper is to present a model to evaluate the technology sustainability (TS) dimension. The methodology of the present work involves a literature review, the development of a model with qualitative and quantitative data, and application in a case study. A structure was developed to include market, technical, and technology-scaling perspectives. The computational model uses hybrid Bayesian networks, based on probabilistic theory, and incorporates uncertainty using sustainability indicators. The model includes quantitative and qualitative variables derived from experts’ opinions. The results of applying the model to a real research project on manhole covers indicate that this analytical tool can support decision-making, allowing a new dimension to be incorporated into LCE analysis. Finally, the model allows LCE analysis to be applied in a variety of circumstances, such as strategy development or the selection of more sustainable products, as well as the evaluation of competing products.

Suggested Citation

  • André Souza Oliveira & Bruno Caetano dos Santos Silva & Cristiano Vasconcellos Ferreira & Renelson Ribeiro Sampaio & Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado & Rodrigo Santiago Coelho, 2021. "Adding Technology Sustainability Evaluation to Product Development: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2097-:d:500133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qin Yang & Zhirui Li & Haisen Jiao & Zufang Zhang & Weijie Chang & Daozhu Wei, 2019. "Bayesian Network Approach to Customer Requirements to Customized Product Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, July.
    2. Li, Jun, 2009. "Scaling up concentrating solar thermal technology in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2051-2060, October.
    3. Gao, Lidan & Porter, Alan L. & Wang, Jing & Fang, Shu & Zhang, Xian & Ma, Tingting & Wang, Wenping & Huang, Lu, 2013. "Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 398-407.
    4. Christina Wulf & Jasmin Werker & Christopher Ball & Petra Zapp & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2019. "Review of Sustainability Assessment Approaches Based on Life Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-43, October.
    5. Mohammad Dehghani Madvar & Hossein Khosropour & Abdollah Khosravanian & Maryam Mirafshar & Morteza Rezapour & Behrouz Nouri, 2016. "Patent-Based Technology Life Cycle Analysis: The Case of the Petroleum Industry," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 72-79.
    6. Uusitalo, Laura, 2007. "Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 312-318.
    7. Fye, Shannon R. & Charbonneau, Steven M. & Hay, Jason W. & Mullins, Carie A., 2013. "An examination of factors affecting accuracy in technology forecasts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(6), pages 1222-1231.
    8. Chang, Shu-Hao & Fan, Chin-Yuan, 2016. "Identification of the technology life cycle of telematics: A patent-based analytical perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.
    10. Joule A. Bergerson & Adam Brandt & Joe Cresko & Michael Carbajales‐Dale & Heather L. MacLean & H. Scott Matthews & Sean McCoy & Marcelle McManus & Shelie A. Miller & William R. Morrow & I. Daniel Pose, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 11-25, February.
    11. Marquez, David & Neil, Martin & Fenton, Norman, 2010. "Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 412-425.
    12. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash, 2016. "A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 68-87.
    13. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Mohammad Dehghani Madvar & Hossein Khosropour & Abdollah Khosravanian & Maryam Mirafshar & Morteza Rezapour & Behrouz Nouri, 2016. "Patent-Based Technology Life Cycle Analysis: The Case of the Petroleum Industry," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(4 (eng)), pages 72-79.
    15. Munir, M. Tajammal & Mansouri, Seyed Soheil & Udugama, Isuru A. & Baroutian, Saeid & Gernaey, Krist V. & Young, Brent R., 2018. "Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Souza Oliveira & Raphael Oliveira dos Santos & Bruno Caetano dos Santos Silva & Lilian Lefol Nani Guarieiro & Matthias Angerhausen & Uwe Reisgen & Renelson Ribeiro Sampaio & Bruna Aparecida Souz, 2021. "A Detailed Forecast of the Technologies Based on Lifecycle Analysis of GMAW and CMT Welding Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Serkan Altuntas & Zulfiye Erdogan & Turkay Dereli, 2020. "A clustering-based approach for the evaluation of candidate emerging technologies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1157-1177, August.
    3. De Iuliis, Melissa & Kammouh, Omar & Cimellaro, Gian Paolo & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2021. "Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. June Young Lee & Sejung Ahn & Dohyun Kim, 2021. "Deep learning-based prediction of future growth potential of technologies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Nicoló Barbieri & François Perruchas & Davide Consoli, 2020. "Specialization, Diversification, and Environmental Technology Life Cycle," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(2), pages 161-186, March.
    6. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 581-607, December.
    7. Ahn, Sang-Jin, 2020. "Three characteristics of technology competition by IoT-driven digitization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2020. "The role of environmental innovation through the technological proximity in the implementation of the sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 493-502, February.
    9. Troullaki, Katerina & Rozakis, Stelios & Kostakis, Vasilis, 2021. "Bridging barriers in sustainability research: Α review from sustainability science to life cycle sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Huang, Ying & Li, Ruinan & Zou, Fang & Jiang, Lidan & Porter, Alan L. & Zhang, Lin, 2022. "Technology life cycle analysis: From the dynamic perspective of patent citation networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Felipe Romero-Perdomo & Miguel Ángel González-Curbelo, 2023. "Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Mohammad Dehghani Madvar & Milad Sadeghzadeh & Mohammad Hossein Rezaei & Manuel Herrera & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2019. "Current Status Investigation and Predicting Carbon Dioxide Emission in Latin American Countries by Connectionist Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Lin, Deming & Liu, Wenbin & Guo, Yinxin & Meyer, Martin, 2021. "Using technological entropy to identify technology life cycle," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    14. Perruchas, François & Consoli, Davide & Barbieri, Nicolò, 2020. "Specialisation, diversification and the ladder of green technology development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    15. Zhang, Haoyuan & Marsh, D. William R, 2021. "Managing infrastructure asset: Bayesian networks for inspection and maintenance decisions reasoning and planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    17. Yu Wang & Roaa H. Latief & Hasan Al-Mosawe & Hussein K. Mohammad & Amjad Albayati & Jonathan Haynes, 2021. "Influence of Iron Filing Waste on the Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    19. S. A. Abu Bakar & Saralees Nadarajah & Z. A. Absl Kamarul Adzhar, 2018. "Loss modeling using Burr mixtures," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1503-1516, June.
    20. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2097-:d:500133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.