IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v96y2018icp64-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Munir, M. Tajammal
  • Mansouri, Seyed Soheil
  • Udugama, Isuru A.
  • Baroutian, Saeid
  • Gernaey, Krist V.
  • Young, Brent R.

Abstract

Large amounts of organic solid waste are generated daily throughout the world. Hydrothermal processing has been shown to be a promising solution for dealing with this type of waste. This paper reviews the types of hydrothermal processing currently available, their advantages and disadvantages, and their suitability for converting organic solid wastes to value-added products. This technology can also be used to produce fuels such as bio-char, bio-oil, and biogas, which are more energy-dense than fuels produced after biochemical conversion of waste. Furthermore, hydrothermally produced fuels have similar energy densities to fossil fuels. Hydrothermal technology provides opportunities for resource recovery such as converting waste into value-added products (e.g., organic acids and fertilisers), nutrient recovery and metal removal from organic waste. The challenges associated with developing hydrothermal processing at an industrial scale are examined, and research perspectives and future developments are discussed in this article. Since the hydrothermal process is capable of eliminating and transforming organic waste efficiently, its customer readiness level (CRL) and societal readiness level (SRL) are moderate. However, this technology has a low technology readiness level (TRL) because it operates at high temperatures and pressures. Lack of fundamental thermodynamic data at extreme conditions, limited understanding of reaction kinetics and mass transfer effects on the process are the main challenges of hydrothermal processing. Other important factors of hydrothermal processing are its economic and safety considerations which must be considered before installing a hydrothermal processing unit. A commercial case study on hydrothermal technology (Terax™) revealed that the challenge of sewage sludge management can be addressed successfully using a combination of biological and hydrothermal processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Munir, M. Tajammal & Mansouri, Seyed Soheil & Udugama, Isuru A. & Baroutian, Saeid & Gernaey, Krist V. & Young, Brent R., 2018. "Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-75.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:96:y:2018:i:c:p:64-75
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118305471
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gupta, Kartick, 2017. "Do economic and societal factors influence the financial performance of alternative energy firms?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 172-182.
    2. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    3. Toor, Saqib Sohail & Rosendahl, Lasse & Rudolf, Andreas, 2011. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subcritical water technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2328-2342.
    4. Gollakota, A.R.K. & Kishore, Nanda & Gu, Sai, 2018. "A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1378-1392.
    5. Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Griffin, G.J. & Mubarak, N.M. & Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Abro, Rashid & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Ali, Brahim Si, 2017. "An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1289-1299.
    6. Tekin, Kubilay & Karagöz, Selhan & Bektaş, Sema, 2014. "A review of hydrothermal biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 673-687.
    7. Akhtar, Javaid & Saidina Amin, NorAishah, 2012. "A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5101-5109.
    8. Li, Rundong & Xie, Yinghui & Yang, Tianhua & Li, Bingshuo & Zhang, Yang & Kai, Xingping, 2016. "Characteristics of the products of hydrothermal liquefaction combined with cellulosic bio-ethanol process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 862-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin J. Taylor & Hassan A. Alabdrabalameer & Vasiliki Skoulou, 2019. "Choosing Physical, Physicochemical and Chemical Methods of Pre-Treating Lignocellulosic Wastes to Repurpose into Solid Fuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Munir, M.T. & Mohaddespour, Ahmad & Nasr, A.T. & Carter, Susan, 2021. "Municipal solid waste-to-energy processing for a circular economy in New Zealand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Gallifuoco, Alberto & Taglieri, Luca & Papa, Alessandro Antonio, 2020. "Hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass to fuel: A novel technique for analyzing experimental data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1254-1260.
    4. Manfredi Picciotto Maniscalco & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Valuable Tool for Energy and Environmental Applications: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Vik, Jostein & Melås, Anders Mahlum & Stræte, Egil Petter & Søraa, Roger Andre, 2021. "Balanced readiness level assessment (BRLa): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. André Souza Oliveira & Bruno Caetano dos Santos Silva & Cristiano Vasconcellos Ferreira & Renelson Ribeiro Sampaio & Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado & Rodrigo Santiago Coelho, 2021. "Adding Technology Sustainability Evaluation to Product Development: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Ayala-Cortés, Alejandro & Arcelus-Arrillaga, Pedro & Millan, Marcos & Okoye, Patrick U. & Arancibia-Bulnes, Camilo A. & Pacheco-Catalán, Daniella Esperanza & Villafán-Vidales, Heidi Isabel, 2022. "Solar hydrothermal processing of agave bagasse: Insights on the effect of operational parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 14-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genel, Salih & Durak, Halil & Durak, Emre Demirer & Güneş, Hasret & Genel, Yaşar, 2023. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass with molybdenum, aluminum, cobalt metal powder catalysts and evaluation of wastewater by fungus cultivation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 20-32.
    2. Tahir H. Seehar & Saqib S. Toor & Ayaz A. Shah & Thomas H. Pedersen & Lasse A. Rosendahl, 2020. "Biocrude Production from Wheat Straw at Sub and Supercritical Hydrothermal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Zhuang, Xiuzheng & Liu, Jianguo & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Zhan, Hao & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "A review on the utilization of industrial biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Yang, Jie & (Sophia) He, Quan & Yang, Linxi, 2019. "A review on hydrothermal co-liquefaction of biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 926-945.
    5. Marco Balsamo & Francesca Di Lauro & Maria Laura Alfieri & Paola Manini & Piero Salatino & Fabio Montagnaro & Roberto Solimene, 2024. "Unravelling the Role of Biochemical Compounds within the Hydrothermal Liquefaction Process of Real Sludge Mixtures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Wądrzyk, Mariusz & Grzywacz, Przemysław & Janus, Rafał & Michalik, Marek, 2021. "A two-stage processing of cherry pomace via hydrothermal treatment followed by biochar gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 248-261.
    7. Kamaldeep Sharma & Ayaz A. Shah & Saqib S. Toor & Tahir H. Seehar & Thomas H. Pedersen & Lasse A. Rosendahl, 2021. "Co-Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignocellulosic Biomass in Supercritical Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    9. Song, Bing & Lin, Richen & Lam, Chun Ho & Wu, Hao & Tsui, To-Hung & Yu, Yun, 2021. "Recent advances and challenges of inter-disciplinary biomass valorization by integrating hydrothermal and biological techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Antonio Picone & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2021. "Process Water Recirculation during Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Current Knowledge and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Mitchell Ubene & Mohammad Heidari & Animesh Dutta, 2022. "Computational Modeling Approaches of Hydrothermal Carbonization: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Makoto M. Watanabe & Andreas Isdepsky, 2021. "Biocrude Oil Production by Integrating Microalgae Polyculture and Wastewater Treatment: Novel Proposal on the Use of Deep Water-Depth Polyculture of Mixotrophic Microalgae," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    13. Jukka Lappalainen & David Baudouin & Ursel Hornung & Julia Schuler & Kristian Melin & Saša Bjelić & Frédéric Vogel & Jukka Konttinen & Tero Joronen, 2020. "Sub- and Supercritical Water Liquefaction of Kraft Lignin and Black Liquor Derived Lignin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-45, June.
    14. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Wang, Liping & Chang, Yuzhi & Li, Aimin, 2019. "Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 423-440.
    16. Taghipour, Alireza & Ramirez, Jerome A. & Brown, Richard J. & Rainey, Thomas J., 2019. "A review of fractional distillation to improve hydrothermal liquefaction biocrude characteristics; future outlook and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Liu, Quan & Zhang, Guanyu & Liu, Mingyang & Kong, Ge & Xu, Ruolan & Han, Lujia & Zhang, Xuesong, 2022. "Fast hydrothermal liquefaction coupled with homogeneous catalysts to valorize livestock manure for enhanced biocrude oil and hydrochar production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 521-533.
    18. Savvas L. Douvartzides & Nikolaos D. Charisiou & Kyriakos N. Papageridis & Maria A. Goula, 2019. "Green Diesel: Biomass Feedstocks, Production Technologies, Catalytic Research, Fuel Properties and Performance in Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-41, February.
    19. Gollakota, A.R.K. & Kishore, Nanda & Gu, Sai, 2018. "A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1378-1392.
    20. Mei Yin Ong & Saifuddin Nomanbhay, 2022. "Optimization Study on Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Malaysian Macroalgae Chaetomorpha sp. for Phenolic-Rich Bio-Oil Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:96:y:2018:i:c:p:64-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.