IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1584-d492026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Cross-Border Classes Feasible for Students to Collaborate in the Analysis of Energy Efficiency Strategies for Socioeconomic Development While Keeping CO 2 Concentration Controlled?

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Araya

    (Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Instituto de Educación, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile)

  • Pedro Collanqui

    (Ministerio de Educación del Perú, Lima 15021, Peru
    Facultad de Educación, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

Abstract

Education is critical for improving energy efficiency and reducing CO 2 concentration, but collaboration between countries is also critical. It is a global problem in which we cannot isolate ourselves. Our students must learn to collaborate in seeking solutions together with others from other countries. Thus, the research question of this study is whether interactive cross-border science classes with energy experiments are feasible and can increase awareness of energy efficiency among middle school students. We designed and tested an interactive cross-border class between Chilean and Peruvian eighth-grade classes. The classes were synchronously connected and all students did experiments and answered open-ended questions on an online platform. Some of the questions were designed to check conceptual understanding whereas others asked for suggestions of how to develop their economies while keeping CO 2 air concentration at acceptable levels. In real time, the teacher reviewed the students’ written answers and the concept maps that were automatically generated based on their responses. Students peer-reviewed their classmates’ suggestions. This is part of an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Science Technology Engineering Mathematics (STEM) education project on energy efficiency using APEC databases. We found high levels of student engagement, where students discussed not only the cross-cutting nature of energy, but also its relation to socioeconomic development and CO 2 emissions, and the need to work together to improve energy efficiency. In conclusion, interactive cross-border science classes are a feasible educational alternative, with potential as a scalable public policy strategy for improving awareness of energy efficiency among the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Araya & Pedro Collanqui, 2021. "Are Cross-Border Classes Feasible for Students to Collaborate in the Analysis of Energy Efficiency Strategies for Socioeconomic Development While Keeping CO 2 Concentration Controlled?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1584-:d:492026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Fredericks & Zhong Fan & Sandra Woolley & Ed de Quincey & Mike Streeton, 2020. "A Decade On, How Has the Visibility of Energy Changed? Energy Feedback Perceptions from UK Focus Groups," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Pretis, Felix & Roser, Max, 2017. "Carbon dioxide emission-intensity in climate projections: Comparing the observational record to socio-economic scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 718-725.
    3. Giles Pepler & Sara Frank Bristow & Paul Bacsich & Nick Jeans & Riina Vuorikari, 2015. "Cross-border Content: Investigation into Sharing Curricula across Borders and the Opportunities for OER," JRC Research Reports JRC94956, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Araya, Roberto & Arias Ortiz, Elena & Bottan, Nicolas L. & Cristia, Julian P., 2019. "Does Gamification in Education Work?: Experimental Evidence from Chile," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9697, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Kandpal, Tara C. & Broman, Lars, 2014. "Renewable energy education: A global status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 300-324.
    6. Sideri Lefkeli & Evangelos Manolas & Konstantinos Ioannou & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2018. "Socio-Cultural Impact of Energy Saving: Studying the Behaviour of Elementary School Students in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Ian Morris, 2013. "The Measure of Civilization: How Social Development Decides the Fate of Nations," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9830.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giulia Grisolia & Umberto Lucia & Marco Filippo Torchio, 2022. "Sustainable Development and Workers Ability: Considerations on the Education Index in the Human Development Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Roberto Araya, 2023. "Connecting Classrooms with Online Interclass Tournaments: A Strategy to Imitate, Recombine and Innovate Teaching Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stamatios Ntanos & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Vasilios Palios & Miltiadis Chalikias, 2018. "Environmental Behavior of Secondary Education Students: A Case Study at Central Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Cardim, Joana & Molina-Millán, Teresa & Vicente, Pedro C., 2023. "Can technology improve the classroom experience in primary education? An African experiment on a worldwide program," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Lafortune, Jeanne & Pugatch, Todd & Tessada, José & Ubfal, Diego, 2022. "Can interactive online training make high school students more entrepreneurial? Experimental evidence from Rwanda," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1041, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. David I. Stern, 2017. "How accurate are energy intensity projections?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 537-545, August.
    5. Paweł Dec & Jacek Wysocki, 2022. "In Search of Non-Obvious Relationships between Greenhouse Gas or Particulate Matter Emissions, Renewable Energy and Corruption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Gui, Shusen & Wu, Chunyou & Qu, Ying & Guo, Lingling, 2017. "Path analysis of factors impacting China's CO2 emission intensity: Viewpoint on energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 650-658.
    7. Ajlan, Abdullah & Tan, Chee Wei & Abdilahi, Abdirahman Mohamed, 2017. "Assessment of environmental and economic perspectives for renewable-based hybrid power system in Yemen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 559-570.
    8. Carbajo, Ruth & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Renewable energy research and technologies through responsible research and innovation looking glass: Reflexions, theoretical approaches and contemporary discourses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 792-808.
    9. Srikanth Reddy, K. & Panwar, Lokesh & Panigrahi, B.K. & Kumar, Rajesh, 2018. "Modeling and analysis of profit based self scheduling of GENCO in electricity markets with renewable energy penetration and emission constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 48-63.
    10. Bichler, Shimshon & Nitzan, Jonathan, 2020. "Growing through Sabotage: Energizing Hierarchical Power," Review of Capital as Power, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism, vol. 1(5), pages 1-78.
    11. Lafortune, Jeanne & Pugatch, Todd & Tessada, José & Ubfal, Diego, 2024. "Can gamified online training make high school students more entrepreneurial? Experimental evidence from Rwanda," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Jie Ma & Amos Oppong & Kingsley Nketia Acheampong & Lucille Aba Abruquah, 2018. "Forecasting Renewable Energy Consumption under Zero Assumptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Jason C. Bradford, 2020. "The Future Is Rural: Societal Adaptation to Energy Descent," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 751-798, May.
    14. Keramitsoglou, Kiriaki M., 2016. "Exploring adolescents’ knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards Renewable Energy Sources: A colour choice approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1159-1169.
    15. Cheng, Shulei & Wu, Yinyin & Chen, Hua & Chen, Jiandong & Song, Malin & Hou, Wenxuan, 2019. "Determinants of changes in electricity generation intensity among different power sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 389-408.
    16. De Juan Fernández, Aránzazu & Poncela, Pilar & Rodríguez Caballero, Carlos Vladimir & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2022. "Economic activity and climate change," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35044, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    17. Cristia, Julian P. & Cueto, Santiago & Malamud, Ofer & Aulagnon, Raphaëlle, 2024. "Streaking to Success: The Effects of Highlighting Streaks on Student Effort and Achievement," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13498, Inter-American Development Bank.
    18. Konstantinos Ioannou, 2019. "Education, Communication and Decision-Making on Renewable and Sustainable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-4, September.
    19. Bryn Durrans & Jonathan Whale & Martina Calais, 2020. "Benchmarking a Sustainable Energy Engineering Undergraduate Degree against Curriculum Frameworks and Pedagogy Standards from Industry and Academia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Škare, Marinko & Porada-Rochoń, Małgorzata, 2023. "Are we making progress on decarbonization? A panel heterogeneous study of the long-run relationship in selected economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1584-:d:492026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.