IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p686-d479196.html

Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC

Author

Listed:
  • Inam Ullah Khalil

    (College of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Sehresh Hena

    (College of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Usman Ghani

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China
    Department of Business Administration, Iqra University, Karachi 75500, Pakistan)

  • Raza Ullah

    (Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Inayatullah Jan

    (Institute of Development Studies (IDS), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Rauf

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Abdul Rehman

    (College of Economics and Management, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Azhar Abbas

    (Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Luan Jingdong

    (College of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the local community support for the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) using the lens of social exchange theory. The study examines the direct effect of social, economic, cultural, and environmental factors on the local community support for CPEC projects, and the resultant impacts on the development and sustainability of the rural economy of Pakistan. The study also explores the moderation effect of media influence on shaping positive perceptions of CPEC among the local populace. The local communities at the CPEC route which are affected or can be affected by the project were targeted for data collection using a structured questionnaire. The collected valid data (N = 259) were thoroughly analyzed by obtaining reliability and validity statistics, a correlation matrix, multiple regression, moderation analysis, and hypotheses testing. Our results substantiate that the local community support for the CPEC project is heavily dependent on social, economic, cultural, and environmental factors and that there is a positive influence of media impact as an opinion-maker in the local community regarding the CPEC. The CPEC is expected to develop the rural economy, particularly through improvements in agriculture and allied activities, thereby providing livelihoods and income-generating opportunities to the rural masses. The article is important for regulators, the CPEC authority, government bodies, and the relevant community.

Suggested Citation

  • Inam Ullah Khalil & Sehresh Hena & Usman Ghani & Raza Ullah & Inayatullah Jan & Abdul Rauf & Abdul Rehman & Azhar Abbas & Luan Jingdong, 2021. "Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:686-:d:479196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/686/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/686/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrier, Mathieu & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2016. "Road traffic noise in Montreal and environmental equity: What is the situation for the most vulnerable population groups?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    2. R. Maria Saleth & Ariel Dinar, 2004. "The Institutional Economics of Water," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3443.
    3. Tausch, Franziska & Zumbuehl, Maria, 2018. "Stability of risk attitudes and media coverage of economic news," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 295-310.
    4. Ali, Liaqat & Mi, Jianing & Shah, Mussawar & Shah, Sayed Jamal & khan, Salim & BiBi, Kausar, 2017. "The Potential Socio-Economic Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 191-198.
    5. Liaqat Ali & Jianing Mi & Mussawar Shah & Sayed Jamal Shah & Salim khan & Kausar BiBi, 2017. "The Potential Socio-Economic Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 191-198, December.
    6. Mohsen Shariatinia & Hamidreza Azizi, 2017. "Iran–China Cooperation in the Silk Road Economic Belt: From Strategic Understanding to Operational Understanding," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 25(5), pages 46-61, September.
    7. Muhammad Asif & Yang Bo Ling, 2019. "China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): International Media Reporting and Legal Validity of Gilgit-Baltistan," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(2), pages 177-177, February.
    8. Hussain, I. & Giordano, M. & Hanjra, M. A., 2003. "Agricultural water and poverty linkages: Case studies on large and small systems," IWMI Research Reports 158358, International Water Management Institute.
    9. Hussain, I. & Giordano, M. & Hanjra, M. A., 2003. "Agricultural water and poverty linkages: Case studies on large and small systems," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    10. repec:iwt:bosers:h032548 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14884 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Qianqian, Li & Yijun, Liu, 2020. "The China-Pakistan economic corridor: The Pakistani media attitudes perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Mike Peters & Chung-Shing Chan & Anita Legerer, 2018. "Local Perception of Impact-Attitudes-Actions towards Tourism Development in the Urlaubsregion Murtal in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beryl Wong Xin Xian & Yani Rahmawati & Al-Hussein Mohammed Hassan Al-Aidrous & Christiono Utomo & Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi & Raflis, 2021. "Value-Based Decision to Redevelop Transportation Facilities: A Case Study of an Abandoned Airport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Visansack Khamphengvong & Hongou Zhang & Qitao Wu & Toulany Thavisay, 2022. "Examine the Economic and Social Effects on Lao People’s Perceived Benefit Attitudes towards BRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Hemoon Kalani & Lorraine Pe Symaco, 2025. "Access to Education of Rural Girls in Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Ittefaq & Zahid Shahab Ahmed & Yadira Ixchel Martínez Pantoja, 2023. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative and soft power in Pakistan: an examination of the local English-language press," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Rashid Menhas & Shahid Mahmood & Papel Tanchangya & Muhammad Nabeel Safdar & Safdar Hussain, 2019. "Sustainable Development under Belt and Road Initiative: A Case Study of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor’s Socio-Economic Impact on Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Ahmad Saad & Guan Xinping & Mariah Ijaz, 2019. "China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Its Influence on Perceived Economic and Social Goals: Implications for Social Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Saddam Hussain & Chunjiao Yu & Ali Sohail & Sadaf Manzoor & Ao Li, 2020. "Assessing the Potential Economic Gains of China-Pakistan-Economic-Corridor Energy Projects for Pakistan," Post-Print hal-03184790, HAL.
    5. Saranjam Baig & Mir Qasim & Li Xuemei & Khalid Mehmood Alam, 2020. "Is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor an Opportunity or a Threat for Small and Micro-Entrepreneurs? Empirical Evidence from Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    7. Dinar, Ariel, 2012. "Economy-wide implications of direct and indirect policy interventions in the water sector: lessons from recent work and future research needs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6068, The World Bank.
    8. Jelena DURKIN BADURINA & Daniela SOLDIC FRLETA & Larry DWYER, 2022. "Meet Sceptics, Neutrals And Believers: An Alternative Approach To Analysing Residents’ Attitudes Towards Tourism In Urban Destinations," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 24-44, February.
    9. repec:iwt:conppr:h042926 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Chen, Jiyong & Liu, Yishuang & Liu, Wei, 2020. "Investment facilitation and China's outward foreign direct investment along the belt and road," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Collins, Timothy W. & Nadybal, Shawna & Grineski, Sara E., 2020. "Sonic injustice: Disparate residential exposures to transport noise from road and aviation sources in the continental United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. repec:iwt:bosers:h042163 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wilson, R. Trevor, 2007. "Perceptions, practices, principles and policies in provision of livestock water in Africa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Roe, Terry & Dinar, Ariel & Tsur, Yacov & Diao, Xinshen, 2005. "Feedback links between economy-wide and farm-level policies: With application to irrigation water management in Morocco," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 905-928, November.
    15. Bhaduri, Anik & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2015. "Adoption of Water-Efficient Technology: Role of Water Price Flexibility, Tenure Uncerntainty and Production Targets in Uzbekistan," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211336, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. V. Ratna Reddy, 2008. "How Participatory is Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM)? A Study of Water User Associations (WUAs) in Andhra Pradesh," Working Papers id:1671, eSocialSciences.
    17. Jetter, Michael & Magnusson, Leandro M. & Roth, Sebastian, 2020. "Becoming sensitive: Males’ risk and time preferences after the 2008 financial crisis," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Jean-Michel Glachant, 2012. "Regulating Networks in the New Economy," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 3(1).
    19. Roe, Terry & Dinar, Ariel & Tsur, Yacov & Xinshen Diao, 2005. "Feedback links between economy-wide and farm-level policies : application to irrigation water management in Morocco," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3550, The World Bank.
    20. repec:iwt:bosers:h042148 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Saleth, Rathinasamy Maria & Dinar, Ariel, "undated". "Impact synergies, institutions, and food security: an evaluation methodology with empirical results," IWMI Conference Proceedings 273363, International Water Management Institute.
    22. Karen Villholth & Lorraine Rajasooriyar, 2010. "Groundwater Resources and Management Challenges in Sri Lanka–an Overview," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(8), pages 1489-1513, June.
    23. V. Ratna Reddy & P. Prudhvikar Reddy, 2005. "How Participatory is Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM)? A Study of Water User Associations (WUAs) in Andhra Pradesh," Development Economics Working Papers 22333, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:686-:d:479196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.