IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13961-d704874.html

A Two-Stage Fuzzy Optimization Model for Urban Land Use: A Case Study of Chongzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Jinjiang Yao

    (Science and Technology Innovation and Public Management Research Center of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Bingkui Qiu

    (Department of Tourism Management, Jin Zhong University, Jinzhong 033619, China)

  • Min Zhou

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Aiping Deng

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Siqi Li

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Under the background of New-type Urbanization, with the continuous advancement of urbanization and the all-round development of cities, all kinds of demands are also rising. In the case of demand, it is difficult to quickly adjust from the land supply side and to guide the optimization of the structure and layout of land use is one of the methods to achieve this based on the current situation and shortage of urban land use structure and spatial arrangement. Because of the complexity, uncertainty and dynamics of the land use system, it is necessary to use an uncertain model to accurately describe and propose the approximate optimal solution, so this study analyzes the influencing mechanism of land use and optimize the land use structure under uncertainties by using a Bayesian network and fuzzy mathematical programming. Based on the results of the two stages of analysis, the cellular automata simulation is completed. The framework is applied to Chongzhou city in western China. The results indicated that the optimal land space for cultivated land is in the middle and the south based on the joint influence probability of arable land and urban construction land. The conversion probability of the area near the east is low, and the joint impact probability of construction land in all areas is generally similar except for the western protection area. After the optimization of the fuzzy planning, the optimal construction land scale is 69.42 km 2 . Under the condition that the cultivated land’s red line is guaranteed, there is still 98.87 km 2 of space for the increase in cultivated land. It is found through simulation that the increase in construction land would occur in the central and western parts of Chongzhou, which may be caused by the urban siphon effect. According to Monte Carlo verification, when the conversion probability exceeds 50%, the cultivated land could be turned into urban construction land, with an accuracy of 91.99%. Therefore, this proposed framework is helpful to understand the process of land use and provides a reference for making scientific and reasonable territorial spatial planning and guiding land use practice under uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinjiang Yao & Bingkui Qiu & Min Zhou & Aiping Deng & Siqi Li, 2021. "A Two-Stage Fuzzy Optimization Model for Urban Land Use: A Case Study of Chongzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13961-:d:704874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grebitus, Carola & Steiner, Bodo & Veeman, Michele, 2015. "The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: Insights from Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 84-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Han & Shiqi Yang, 2023. "A Study on Industrial Heritage Renewal Strategy Based on Hybrid Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samia Ayyub & Xuhui Wang & Muhammad Asif & Rana Muhammad Ayyub, 2018. "Antecedents of Trust in Organic Foods: The Mediating Role of Food Related Personality Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Marie Diekmann & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2019. "Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 733-746, December.
    3. Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Pappa, Valentina, 2016. "Elicitation formats and the WTA/WTP gap: A study of climate neutral foods," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-155.
    4. Christopher B. Barrett & Miguel I. Gόmez, 2025. "Fostering Healthy, Equitable, Resilient, and Sustainable Agri‐Food Value Chains," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 390-400, May.
    5. repec:ags:cfcp15:344330 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tong Hu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Mengling Wu & Qing Yang, 2024. "Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Anastasia V. Kistova & Julia S. Zamaraeva & Natalia N. Pimenova & Ksenia V. Reznikova & Natalia P. Koptseva & Natalia N. Seredkina, 2016. "Regional Peculiarities in Modernization Processes within the Territories of Central Siberia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 857-865.
    8. Hansen, Torben & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2018. "The influence of consumers’ interest in healthy eating, definitions of healthy eating, and personal values on perceived dietary quality," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 55-67.
    9. Cyrielle Gaglio & Simone Pfuderer & Bodo Steiner, 2024. "Sustainability initiatives in food supply chains from stakeholders' perspectives: An analysis of predictors of cognition-based trust and trust initiatives," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2024 24, Stata Users Group.
    10. Rim Lassoued & Jill E. Hobbs & Eric T. Micheels & David Di Zhang, 2015. "Consumer Trust in Chicken Brands: A Structural Equation Model," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(4), pages 621-647, December.
    11. Libin Chen & Qi Wu & Lin Jiang, 2022. "Impact of Environmental Concern on Ecological Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Effect of Prosociality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Giampietri, Elisa & Yu, Xiaohua & Trestini, Samuele, . "The role of trust and perceived barriers on farmer’s intention to adopt risk management tools," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(01).
    13. Enoch Owusu-Sekyere & Awudu Abdulai & Henry Jordaan, 2020. "Correction to: Heterogeneous demand for ecologically sustainable products on ensuring environmental sustainability in South Africa," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(1), pages 65-65, January.
    14. Kai Guo & Zhigang Wang & Lei Zhang & Chenya Li, 2023. "Self-Transcendence Values Influence Meaningful Sports Consumption Behavior: The Chain Mediator of Team Identification and Eudaimonic Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    15. Tonkin, Emma & Meyer, Samantha B. & Coveney, John & Webb, Trevor & Wilson, Annabelle M., 2016. "The process of making trust related judgements through interaction with food labelling," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Rao Yuan & Shaosheng Jin & Wen Lin, 2025. "Could trust narrow the intention‐behavior gap in eco‐friendly food consumption? Evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 260-288, January.
    17. Weinrich, Ramona & Spiller, Achim, . "Can a Multi-Level Label do Better than a Binary Label for Animal Welfare? A PLS-Analysis of Consumer Satisfaction," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1-30.
    18. Anastasia V. Kistova & Julia S. Zamaraeva & Natalia N. Pimenova & Ksenia V. Reznikova & Natalia P. Koptseva & Natalia N. Seredkina, 2016. "Regional Peculiarities in Modernization Processes within the Territories of Central Siberia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 857-865.
    19. Bodo E. Steiner, 2017. "A phenomenon-driven approach to the study of value creation and organizational design issues in agri-business value chains," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 19(1), pages 89-118.
    20. Bhishma R. Dahal & Karen L. DeLong & Shijun Gao & Carola Grebitus & Andrew Muhammad, 2025. "Factors affecting Chinese consumers' beef purchase frequency," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 521-543, April.
    21. De Marchi, Elisa & Caputo, Vincenzina & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Banterle, Alessandro, 2016. "Time preferences and food choices: Evidence from a choice experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 99-109.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13961-:d:704874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.