IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13469-d695888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Popular and Solidarity Economy: Policies and Realities in the Local Context—The Case of the Agricultural Productive Associations of El Valle, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Gliceria Gómez-Ceballos

    (Grupo de Investigación de Gestión de las Mipymes, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador)

  • Juan Pablo Vázquez-Loaiza

    (Grupo de Investigación de Gestión de las Mipymes, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador)

  • Dora Priscilla Herrera-Torres

    (Grupo de Investigación de Gestión de las Mipymes, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador)

  • Ana Julia Vega-Luna

    (Grupo de Investigación de Gestión de las Mipymes, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador)

Abstract

The popular and solidarity economy (EPS) emerges as an alternative approach to poverty aligned with the principles of sustainable development; in this sense, some countries in the region have adopted policies for its growth and development, among them Ecuador. The experience of a rural community was shown; the objective of the study was to identify the factors that hinder the achievement of better efficiency indexes, regarding the implementation of policies at the local level, with respect to rural productive associations. The case of the agricultural productive associations located in the parish of El Valle, Cuenca, Ecuador, was studied. The type of research was mixed: quantitative to support the information extracted from the instruments applied and derive the pertinent analysis and qualitative to collect primary information from the actors involved in the study. We used the action research model through the use of surveys, interviews and focus groups. The key contribution of this work was to making visible and understanding the needs of the rural communities of the sector from their development perspectives, respecting their ancestral knowledge and articulating from the academy the private–public action for the generation of policies for governance, effective application of democracy and promotion of the technical and associative potential of the agroecological productive units. The results show regularities in terms of their socioeconomic situation, their mode of action and the impact caused on their productive dynamics by the atomized decisions of local actors in the exercise of governance. These fail to articulate the implementation of policies at the territorial level to the detriment of their effectiveness and efficiency and, therefore, do not bring about substantial changes in their levels of dependence and dynamics of productive activity—diagnostic components that will be used for the formulation of joint multilevel policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gliceria Gómez-Ceballos & Juan Pablo Vázquez-Loaiza & Dora Priscilla Herrera-Torres & Ana Julia Vega-Luna, 2021. "Popular and Solidarity Economy: Policies and Realities in the Local Context—The Case of the Agricultural Productive Associations of El Valle, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13469-:d:695888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margarita Gafaro & José Antonio Ocampo & Sonia Daniela Monroy-Cely & Alejandro Rueda-Sanz, 2019. "Revisión de experiencias de apoyo a la agricultura familiar," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, issue 91, pages 1-77, August.
    2. Roberto F. Bertossi, 2007. "Propuestas Para Una Educación Cooperativa En Un Contexto De Economía Social," Observatorio Iberoamericano del Desarrollo Local y la Economía Social, Servicios Académicos Intercontinentales SL, issue 0, June.
    3. Mellor, John W. & Malik, Sohail J., 2017. "The Impact of Growth in Small Commercial Farm Productivity on Rural Poverty Reduction," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Brzeska, Joanna & Fan, Shenggen & Halsema, Alex & Keyzer, Michiel, 2013. "From subsistence to profit: Transforming smallholder farms," Food policy reports 26, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Unai Villalba-Eguiluz & Asier Arcos-Alonso & Juan Carlos Pérez de Mendiguren & Leticia Urretabizkaia, 2020. "Social and Solidarity Economy in Ecuador: Fostering an Alternative Development Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tingting Huang & Qinghua Huang, 2023. "Research on Agricultural and Rural Public Governance and Sustainable Development: Evidence from 2350 Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayat Ullah & Nasir Mahmood & Alam Zeb & Harald Kächele, 2020. "Factors Determining Farmers’ Access to and Sources of Credit: Evidence from the Rain-Fed Zone of Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2018. "Productivity and efficiency in high-potential areas," IFPRI book chapters, in: The economics of teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s biggest cash crop, chapter 7, pages 149-180, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. repec:osf:socarx:783rw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nelson Mango & Clifton Makate & Lulseged Tamene & Powell Mponela & Gift Ndengu, 2018. "Adoption of Small-Scale Irrigation Farming as a Climate-Smart Agriculture Practice and Its Influence on Household Income in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Lopera-Arbeláez, Isabel & Richter, Solveig, 2024. "Transformative approaches for peace-centred sustainable development: The role of social and solidarity economy," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    6. Sohail Jehangir Malik & Asjad Tariq Sheikh & Amir Hamza Jilani, 2016. "Inclusive Agricultural Growth in Pakistan—Understanding Some Basic Constraints," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 889-903.
    7. Meilin Ma & Jessie Lin & Richard J. Sexton, 2022. "The Transition from Small to Large Farms in Developing Economies: A Welfare Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 111-133, January.
    8. Promkhambut, Arunee & Yokying, Phanwin & Woods, Kevin & Fisher, Micah & Li Yong, Ming & Manorom, Kanokwan & Baird, Ian G. & Fox, Jefferson, 2023. "Rethinking agrarian transition in Southeast Asia through rice farming in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Luna, Fátima & Wilson, Paul N., . "An Economic Exploration of Smallholder Value Chains: Coffee Transactions in Chiapas, Mexico," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22.
    10. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethelihem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2015. "Smallholder Teff Productivity and Efficiency: Evidence from High-Potential Districts of Ethiopia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212257, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Shanping Wang & Peng Cao & Xiao Ouyang, 2024. "Nonlinear influence of construction land on poverty reduction efficiency in Chinese poor counties: new evidence using a panel threshold model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3557-3587, February.
    12. Wood, Benjamin D.K. & Dong, Michell, 2015. "Recalling Extra Data: A Replication Study of Finding Missing Markets," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 206225, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    13. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2015. "Cereal productivity and its drivers: The case of Ethiopia," ESSP working papers 75, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Diwakar KC & Tek Maraseni & Chubamenla Jamir & Ritendra Thapa Magar & Florencia Tuladhar, 2020. "Effectiveness of Gravity Goods Ropeways in market participation of smallholder farmers in uplands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1393-1414, June.
    15. Chigunhah Blessing Ropafadzo & Svotwa Ezekia & Munyoro Gerald & Mabvure Tendai Joseph & Govere Ignatius, 2020. "Characterization of bank lending requirements for farmers in Zimbabwe," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(2), pages 628-644, December.
    16. Katsushi S. Imai & Raghav Gaiha, 2014. "Dynamic and Long-term Linkages among Growth, Inequality and Poverty in Developing Countries," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1410, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    17. Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L. & Mavrotas, George, "undated". "Macroeconomic Factor Influence on Agricultural Program Sustainability in Kaduna State, Nigeria," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 265415, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    18. Naudé Malan, 2015. "Urban farmers and urban agriculture in Johannesburg: Responding to the food resilience strategy," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 51-75, June.
    19. repec:ags:iaae15:211355 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Megan Mucioki & Bernard Pelletier & Timothy Johns & Lutta W. Muhammad & Gordon M. Hickey, 2018. "On developing a scale to measure chronic household seed insecurity in semi-arid Kenya and the implications for food security policy," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(3), pages 571-587, June.
    21. Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Mangirdas Morkunas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Who Benefits from CAP? The Way the Direct Payments System Impacts Socioeconomic Sustainability of Small Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    22. Nagaraj, N. & Deb, Uttam & Nageswara Rao, G.D. & Bantilan, Cynthia & Anusha, R., "undated". "Is Smallholder Farming Economically Viable? Evidences from Village Dynamics Studies in Karnataka, Peninsular India," Conference Papers 261298, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13469-:d:695888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.