IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12563-d678725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Factors for Involvement Degree and Perceived Value in Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Unpacked Stores

Author

Listed:
  • Jui-Che Tu

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Douliu City 640301, Taiwan)

  • Ting-Yun Lo

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Douliu City 640301, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Jing Sie

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Douliu City 640301, Taiwan)

  • Tsai-Feng Kao

    (School of Arts, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China)

Abstract

The Taiwanese government has decided to reduce the use of disposable plastics in response to the European Union’s announcement of the Circular Economy Action Plan. With the circular economy becoming a sustainable development trend, consumers have become the latter and the environment’s lifeblood. There has been a wave of unpacked stores around the world in recent years, encouraging consumers to reduce the use of plastics and bring their own bags or containers when shopping, thereby reducing the waste of resources. This research adopted qualitative and quantitative research methods to verify the model of involvement degree and perceived value on consumers’ purchase intentions in unpacked stores through expert interviews and structural equations and extract the key factors for promoting unpacked stores. The research results show that the three dimensions of involvement degree will indirectly affect consumers’ purchase intentions through the four dimensions of perceived value. Perceived value plays a mediating role between the involvement degree and purchase intention. Unpacked stores can be used to promote industry characteristics and image, and unpacked consumption thinking can be advanced through the Internet, education, or lectures based on community development. In this way, unpacked stores can be instilled in people’s psychological value.

Suggested Citation

  • Jui-Che Tu & Ting-Yun Lo & Yi-Jing Sie & Tsai-Feng Kao, 2021. "Key Factors for Involvement Degree and Perceived Value in Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Unpacked Stores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12563-:d:678725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greger Henriksson & Lynn Åkesson & Susanne Ewert, 2010. "Uncertainty Regarding Waste Handling in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Greenwald, Anthony G & Leavitt, Clark, 1984. "Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 581-592, June.
    3. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    4. da Cruz, Nuno F. & Ferreira, Sandra & Cabral, Marta & Simões, Pedro & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2014. "Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59755, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Diallo, Mbaye Fall, 2012. "Effects of store image and store brand price-image on store brand purchase intention: Application to an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 360-367.
    6. Ziynet Boz & Virpi Korhonen & Claire Koelsch Sand, 2020. "Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    2. Ahrholdt, Dennis C. & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "Enhancing loyalty: When improving consumer satisfaction and delight matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 18-27.
    3. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    4. Shalom Levy & Israel Nebenzahl, 2008. "The influence of product involvement on consumers’ interactive processes in interactive television," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 65-77, March.
    5. Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique & Chamhuri Siwar & Basri Talib & Farah Hasan Sarah & Norshamliza Chamhuri, 2014. "Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Das, Manoj & Ramalingam, Mahesh, 2022. "What drives product involvement and satisfaction with OFDs amid COVID-19?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Krishnamurthy, Anup & Kumar, S. Ramesh, 2018. "Electronic word-of-mouth and the brand image: Exploring the moderating role of involvement through a consumer expectations lens," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 149-156.
    8. Chebat, Jean-Charles & Charlebois, Mathieu & Gelinas-Chebat, Claire, 2001. "What makes open vs. closed conclusion advertisements more persuasive? The moderating role of prior knowledge and involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 93-102, August.
    9. Chandrashekaran, R., 2001. "The implications of individual differences in reference price utilization for designing effective price communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 85-91, August.
    10. Candy Lim Chiu & Han-Chiang Ho, 2023. "Impact of Celebrity, Micro-Celebrity, and Virtual Influencers on Chinese Gen Z’s Purchase Intention Through Social Media," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    11. Federico Gaudenzi, 2020. "Bias in purchase decisions: correlation between expectations and procrastination in high and low involvement products," Working Papers hal-02560384, HAL.
    12. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Uniyal, Dwarika Prasad, 2016. "Impact of Store format on Shopping Involvement," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-06-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    13. Peschel, Anne O. & Grebitus, Carola & Colson, Gregory & Hu, Wuyang, 2016. "Explaining the use of attribute cut-off values in decision making by means of involvement," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 58-66.
    14. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    15. Robin, Donald P. & Reidenbach, R. Eric & Forrest, P. J., 1996. "The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 17-28, January.
    16. Yanbo Zhang & Chuanlan Liu & Yanru Lyu, 2023. "Profiling Consumers: Examination of Chinese Gen Z Consumers’ Sustainable Fashion Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Uniyal, Dwarika Prasad, 2014. "Impact of Store format on Shopping Involvement," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-06, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    18. Lee, Hanjoon & Herr, Paul M. & Kardes, Frank R. & Kim, Chankon, 1999. "Motivated Search: Effects of Choice Accountability, Issue Involvement, and Prior Knowledge on Information Acquisition and Use," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 75-88, May.
    19. Cahyanto, Ignatius & Pennington-Gray, Lori & Thapa, Brijesh & Srinivasan, Siva & Villegas, Jorge & Matyas, Corene & Kiousis, Spiro, 2016. "Predicting information seeking regarding hurricane evacuation in the destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 264-275.
    20. Hsu, Hsuan Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai, 2011. "Understanding customer experiences in online blog environments," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 510-523.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12563-:d:678725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.