IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12033-d669278.html

Exploring Twitter Discourse around the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Advance Agricultural Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine E. Sanders

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA)

  • Kennedy A. Mayfield-Smith

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA)

  • Alexa J. Lamm

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents an exploration of public discourse surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in agriculture, specifically related to precision agriculture techniques. (1) Advancements in the use of AI have increased its implementation in the agricultural sector, often framed as a sustainable solution for feeding a growing global population. However, lessons learned from previous agricultural innovations indicate that new technologies may face public scrutiny and suspicion, limiting the dissemination of the innovation. Using systems thinking approaches can help to improve the development and dissemination of agricultural innovations and limit the unintended consequences of innovations within society. (2) To analyze the current discourse surrounding AI in agriculture, a content analysis was conducted on Twitter using Meltwater to select tweets with specific reach and engagement. (3) Seven themes resulted from the analysis: precision agriculture and digital technology innovation; transformation and the future of agriculture; accelerate solutions, solve challenges; data management and accessibility; transforming crop management, prioritizing adoption; and AI and sustainability. (4) The discourse on AI in agriculture on Twitter was overwhelmingly positive, failing to account for the potential drawbacks or limits of the innovation. This paper examines the limits of the current communication and outreach across environmental, economic, social, cultural, political, and behavioral contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine E. Sanders & Kennedy A. Mayfield-Smith & Alexa J. Lamm, 2021. "Exploring Twitter Discourse around the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Advance Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12033-:d:669278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12033/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12033/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 25-35.
    2. Asaf Tzachor, 2021. "Barriers to AI Adoption in Indian Agriculture: An Initial Inquiry," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 30-44, July.
    3. Dokyun Lee & Kartik Hosanagar & Harikesh S. Nair, 2018. "Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5105-5131, November.
    4. Carbonell, Isabelle M., 2016. "The ethics of big data in big agriculture," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13.
    5. Lama Altoaimy, 2018. "Driving Change on Twitter: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of the Twitter Debates on the Saudi Ban on Women Driving," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Başak Kalkanci & Morvarid Rahmani & L. Beril Toktay, 2019. "The Role of Inclusive Innovation in Promoting Social Sustainability," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 2960-2982, December.
    7. Assunta Di Vaio & Flavio Boccia & Loris Landriani & Rosa Palladino, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence in the Agri-Food System: Rethinking Sustainable Business Models in the COVID-19 Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Al Haj Eid & Ala' Omar Dandis & Virginia Cathro & Mathew Parackal, 2024. "Exploring public voice on social media: Twitter Users' views on the circular economy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6360-6373, December.
    2. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Anna Krombacher & Anna-Katharina Lindenthal & Anna Maria Oberländer & Ricarda Schäfer, 2026. "Sustainable through Digital – A Research Agenda for Digital Social Innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 381-417, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El Bhilat, El Mehdi & El Jaouhari, Asmae & Hamidi, L. Saadia, 2024. "Assessing the influence of artificial intelligence on agri-food supply chain performance: the mediating effect of distribution network efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Yaxuan Ran & Jiani Liu & Yishi Zhang, 2023. "Integrating Users’ Contextual Engagements with Their General Preferences: An Interpretable Followee Recommendation Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 614-632, May.
    3. Iva Gregurec & Martina Tomičić Furjan & Katarina Tomičić-Pupek, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Business Models in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Mary Beth McCabe & Richard Weaver, 2018. "Social Media Marketing Strategies For Educational Programs," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(2), pages 53-62.
    6. Rula Abushanab, 2024. "Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 5(1), pages 275-294.
    7. Brittany Ryder & Tingting Zhang & Nan Hua, 2021. "The Social Media “Magic”: Virtually Engaging Visitors during COVID-19 Temporary Closures," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Kunpeng Zhang & Wendy Moe, 2021. "Measuring Brand Favorability Using Large-Scale Social Media Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1139, December.
    9. Femg, Xunan & Johansson, Anders C., 2019. "News or Noise? The Information Content of Social Media in China," Stockholm School of Economics Asia Working Paper Series 2019-52, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm China Economic Research Institute.
    10. Herron, Charles B. & Nilakantan, Rahul & Iyengar, Deepak & Richey, Robert Glenn & Rao, Shashank, 2026. "On social inequality, financial inclusion, and poverty at the bottom of the pyramid: Is financial equity enough?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Stéphanie Camaréna, 2021. "Engaging with Artificial Intelligence (AI) with a Bottom-Up Approach for the Purpose of Sustainability: Victorian Farmers Market Association, Melbourne Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Wang, Jiaxin & Zhao, Mu & Huang, Xiang & Song, Zilong & Sun, Di, 2024. "Supply chain diffusion mechanisms for AI applications: A perspective on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Tingting Song & Jinghua Huang & Yong Tan & Yifan Yu, 2019. "Using User- and Marketer-Generated Content for Box Office Revenue Prediction: Differences Between Microblogging and Third-Party Platforms," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 191-203, March.
    14. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    15. Hanane Lasmi & Chul Ho Lee & Yasin Ceran, 2025. "Popularity Brings Better Sales or Vice Versa: Evidence from Instagram and OpenTable," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 26(4), pages 923-967, August.
    16. Halloran, Timothy J. & Lutz, Richard J., 2021. "Let's Give Them Something to Talk About: Which Social Media Engagements Predict Purchase Frequency?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 83-95.
    17. Subhodeep Mukherjee & Venkataiah Chittipaka, 2022. "Analysing the Adoption of Intelligent Agent Technology in Food Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Evidence," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(4), pages 438-454, December.
    18. Barrios, Andrés & Camacho, Sonia & Reficco, Ezequiel, 2025. "Digital technologies for inclusive innovations in humanitarian response," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Siyu Gao & Haixiang Guo & Jing Yu, 2021. "Urban Water Inclusive Sustainability: Evidence from 38 Cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, February.
    20. José Ignacio Conde-Ruiz & Juan José Ganuza Fernandez & Manuel García & Carlos Victoria Lanzón, 2024. "AI and Digital Technology: Gender Gaps in Higher Education," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 70(3), pages 244-270.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12033-:d:669278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.