IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9885-d628002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Qin Yang

    (College of Economics, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China)

  • Young-Chan Lee

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Management and Economics, Dongguk University, Gyeongju 38066, Korea)

Abstract

Suppressing knowledge hiding is a prerequisite for achieving positive knowledge interactions among people. Most previous studies concentrate on knowledge hiding in organizations, but the quantitative examination of knowledge hiding antecedents in the online knowledge community has been limited. This study investigates individuals’ knowledge hiding intentions in the context of the online knowledge community through an integrated framework of protection motivation theory, self-determination theory, and social exchange beliefs. We tested the research model through a valid sample of 377 respondents from Chinese online knowledge community users. The results demonstrate that individuals’ threat appraisal (perceived severity and perceived vulnerability) and intrinsic motivation (perceived autonomy and perceived relatedness) are negatively associated with interdependence. Additionally, interdependence within the online knowledge community is proved to negatively affect individuals’ knowledge hiding intention. Furthermore, reciprocity and trust moderate the relationship between interdependence and knowledge hiding intentions. This study enriches the academic literature in the knowledge hiding field, and the findings provide an in-depth understanding of knowledge hiding in the context of the online knowledge community.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Yang & Young-Chan Lee, 2021. "Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9885-:d:628002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao‐Liang Shen & Yang‐Jun Li & Yongqiang Sun & Jun Chen & Feng Wang, 2019. "Knowledge withholding in online knowledge spaces: Social deviance behavior and secondary control perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(4), pages 385-401, April.
    2. Amitabh Anand & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2020. "Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding," Post-Print hal-02870014, HAL.
    3. Richard M. Ryan & Veronika Huta & Edward Deci, 2008. "Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 139-170, January.
    4. Hongliang Chen & Christopher E. Beaudoin & Traci Hong, 2016. "Teen online information disclosure: Empirical testing of a protection motivation and social capital model," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(12), pages 2871-2881, December.
    5. Pereira, Vijay & Mohiya, Mohamed, 2021. "Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 368-381.
    6. Coun, Martine J.H. & Peters, Pascale & Blomme, Rob J., 2019. "‘Let's share!’ The mediating role of employees' self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 481-491.
    7. Button, Scott B. & Mathieu, John E. & Zajac, Dennis M., 1996. "Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 26-48, July.
    8. Wang, Jie & Liu-Lastres, Bingjie & Ritchie, Brent W. & Mills, Deborah J., 2019. "Travellers' self-protections against health risks: An application of the full Protection Motivation Theory," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Xiaofeng Su & Wenhe Lin & Jingjing Wu & Qiuqin Zheng & Xiaoxia Chen & Xiaoli Jiang, 2021. "Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Sharing: The Effects of Positive Reciprocity and Moral Efficacy," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    10. Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2019. "Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 10-19.
    11. Siachou, Evangelia & Trichina, Eleni & Papasolomou, Ioanna & Sakka, Georgia, 2021. "Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 195-213.
    12. Peter Meso & Yi Ding & Shuting Xu, 2013. "Applying Protection Motivation Theory to Information Security Training for College Students," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 47-67, January.
    13. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Pezzi, Alberto & Kalisz, David E., 2021. "The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 220-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yantai & Luo, Haibei & Chen, Jin & Guo, Yanlin, 2022. "Building data-driven dynamic capabilities to arrest knowledge hiding: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1138-1154.
    2. Tan, Chunping & Zhang, Jiayan & Zhang, Yuqi, 2022. "The mechanism of team-member exchange on knowledge hiding under the background of “Guanxi”," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 304-314.
    3. Pandey, Jatin & Gupta, Manish & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup & Hassan, Yusuf & Kukreja, Priyam, 2021. "Technology-enabled knowledge management for community healthcare workers: The effects of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 787-799.
    4. Atif Saleem Butt, 2021. "Determinants of top-down knowledge hiding in firms: an individual-level perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 259-279, April.
    5. Khelladi, Insaf & Castellano, Sylvaine & Hobeika, Janine & Perano, Mirko & Rutambuka, David, 2022. "Customer knowledge hiding behavior in service multi-sided platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 482-490.
    6. Xiong, Chang & Zheng, Leven J. & Germon, Rony & Susini, Jean-Paul & Chang, Victor, 2021. "Telling “white lies” within the entrepreneurial firm: How rationalized knowledge hiding between founder CEO and founder CTO influences new product development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 431-439.
    7. Scuotto, Veronica & Nespoli, Chiara & Tran, Phuong Tra & Cappiello, Giuseppe, 2022. "An alternative way to predict knowledge hiding: The lens of transformational leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 76-84.
    8. Batistič, Saša & Poell, Rob F., 2022. "Do HR systems and relational climates affect knowledge hiding? An experiment and two-source multi-level study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 82-96.
    9. Roksana Binte Rezwan & Yoshi Takahashi, 2021. "The Psychology behind Knowledge Hiding in an Organization," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-38, May.
    10. S. M. F. D. Syed Mustapha & Edmund Evangelista & Farhi Marir, 2023. "Towards Designing a Knowledge Sharing System for Higher Learning Institutions in the UAE Based on the Social Feature Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Hao-Fan Chumg & Jia-Wen Shin & Hsiu-Yen Chiang & Man-ting Ho, 2022. "What Drives Working Habits for Sharing Knowledge in Virtual Teams? An Organizational Embeddedness Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    12. Shrivastava, Samir & Pazzaglia, Federica & Sonpar, Karan, 2021. "The role of nature of knowledge and knowledge creating processes in knowledge hiding: Reframing knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 644-651.
    13. Che, Feng & Zhou, Yalin & Liu, Yipeng, 2022. "Social Quality, Knowledge Hiding, and Community Capacity: A Study on Multi-Ethnic Communities in Chinese Cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1024-1038.
    14. Donate, Mario J. & González-Mohíno, Miguel & Paolo Appio, Francesco & Bernhard, Fabian, 2022. "Dealing with knowledge hiding to improve innovation capabilities in the hotel industry: The unconventional role of knowledge-oriented leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 572-586.
    15. Zutshi, Ambika & Creed, Andrew & Bhattacharya, Ananya & Bavik, Ali & Sohal, Amrik & Bavik, Yuen Lam, 2021. "Demystifying knowledge hiding in academic roles in higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 206-221.
    16. Caputo, Francesco & Magni, Domitilla & Papa, Armando & Corsi, Christian, 2021. "Knowledge hiding in socioeconomic settings: Matching organizational and environmental antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 19-27.
    17. Haar, Jarrod & O'Kane, Conor & Cunningham, James A., 2022. "Firm-level antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding climate," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 410-421.
    18. Iva Gregurec & Martina Tomičić Furjan & Katarina Tomičić-Pupek, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Business Models in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Sherry E. Moss & Meng Song & Sean T. Hannah & Zhen Wang & John J. Sumanth, 2020. "The Duty to Improve Oneself: How Duty Orientation Mediates the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Feedback-Seeking and Feedback-Avoiding Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 615-631, September.
    20. Emre Yildiz, H. & Murtic, Adis & Klofsten, Magnus & Zander, Udo & Richtnér, Anders, 2021. "Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9885-:d:628002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.