IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v74y2023i10p1170-1184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Zhang
  • Durong Wang
  • Yuyao Tang
  • Quan Xiao

Abstract

Social question‐and‐answer (Q&A) communities are becoming increasingly important for knowledge acquisition. However, some users withhold knowledge, which can hinder the effectiveness of these platforms. Based on social exchange theory, the study investigates how different types of questions influence knowledge withholding, with question difficulty and user anonymity as boundary conditions. Two experiments were conducted to test hypotheses. Results indicate that informational questions are more likely to lead to knowledge withholding than conversational ones, as they elicit more fear of negative evaluation and fear of exploitation. The study also examines the interplay of question difficulty and user anonymity with question type. Overall, this study significantly extends the existing literature on counterproductive knowledge behavior by exploring the antecedents of knowledge withholding in social Q&A communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Zhang & Durong Wang & Yuyao Tang & Quan Xiao, 2023. "How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(10), pages 1170-1184, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:10:p:1170-1184
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24813
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cruz, Ryan E. & Leonhardt, James M. & Pezzuti, Todd, 2017. "Second Person Pronouns Enhance Consumer Involvement and Brand Attitude," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-116.
    2. Alton Y. K. Chua & Snehasish Banerjee, 2013. "So fast so good: An analysis of answer quality and answer speed in community Question-answering sites," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(10), pages 2058-2068, October.
    3. Zhanfei Lei & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2021. "Focus Within or On Others: The Impact of Reviewers’ Attentional Focus on Review Helpfulness," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 801-819, September.
    4. Xiao‐Liang Shen & Yang‐Jun Li & Yongqiang Sun & Jun Chen & Feng Wang, 2019. "Knowledge withholding in online knowledge spaces: Social deviance behavior and secondary control perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(4), pages 385-401, April.
    5. Kmieciak, Roman, 2023. "Knowledge-withholding behaviours among IT specialists: the roles of job insecurity, work overload and supervisor support," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 383-399, March.
    6. Miriam J. Metzger, 2007. "Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2078-2091, November.
    7. Pereira, Vijay & Mohiya, Mohamed, 2021. "Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 368-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin Yang & Young-Chan Lee, 2021. "Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Hao-Fan Chumg & Jia-Wen Shin & Hsiu-Yen Chiang & Man-ting Ho, 2022. "What Drives Working Habits for Sharing Knowledge in Virtual Teams? An Organizational Embeddedness Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    3. Daniele Dalli & Annamaria Tuan & David D?Acunto, 2018. "How online reviewers and actual customers evaluate their shopping experiences. Evidence from an international retail chain," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 163-180.
    4. Plank, Andreas, 2016. "The hidden risk in user-generated content: An investigation of ski tourers' revealed risk-taking behavior on an online outdoor sports platform," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 289-296.
    5. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Cherley C. Du Plessis, 2023. "The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Komal Khalid & Saima Aftab, 2024. "Exploitative Leadership and Vertical Knowledge Withholding: Examining Multiple Mediational Effects," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    7. Payal S. Kapoor & K.R. Jayasimha & Ashish Sadh, 2013. "Brand-related, Consumer to Consumer, Communication via Social Media," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 43-59, January.
    8. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    9. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Ahmed, Fawad & Zhao, Fuqiang & Uma Stra, Helen, 2025. "The paradox of dual orientation in human resource practices and its cross-level effect on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Lanfei Shi & Siva Viswanathan, 2023. "Optional Verification and Signaling in Online Matching Markets: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1603-1621, December.
    12. Hsu, Hsuan Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai, 2011. "Understanding customer experiences in online blog environments," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 510-523.
    13. Baxter, Graeme & Marcella, Rita, 2017. "Voters’ online information behaviour and response to campaign content during the Scottish referendum on independence," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 539-546.
    14. Devan Ray Donaldson & Colin Bradley LeFevre, 2022. "Records, trust, and misinformation: Using birtherism to understand the influence of conspiracy theories on human information interactions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1579-1593, November.
    15. Annamaria Tuan & Sebastiano Grandi, 2018. "Emerging trends in qualitative research. A focus on Social Media," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(4), pages 17-26.
    16. Dezhi Yin & Triparna de Vreede & Logan M. Steele & Gert-Jan de Vreede, 2023. "Decide Now or Later: Making Sense of Incoherence Across Online Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1211-1227, September.
    17. Hsin‐Hui Lin & Ching‐Feng Chen & Chih‐Lun Wu, 2023. "The effects of news authenticity and social media tie strength on consumer dissemination behavior," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2292-2313, June.
    18. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    19. Viotto da Cruz, Jordana, 2018. "Beyond financing: crowdfunding as an informational mechanism," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 371-393.
    20. Mohamed Mohiya, 2024. "An investigation into employees’ factors of flexible working hours (FWH) for productivity in Saudi: a mixed qualitative triangulation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:10:p:1170-1184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.