IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7697-d591514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents and Consequences of Digital Shadow Work in Mobile Shopping Apps Context

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Yul Ryoo

    (Department of Business Administration, Daejin University, Pocheon-si 11159, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Sang-Cheol Park

    (Department of Business Administration, Daegu University, Gyeongsan-si 38453, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea)

Abstract

Shadow work continues to witness a significant uptick in the context of mobile shopping. Therefore, we question whether shadow work perceived by mobile shoppers may become a bigger problem, create fatigue for mobile shoppers, and lead them to discontinue the use of mobile shopping apps. This study examines the relationship between shadow work and the discontinuance of mobile shopping apps. Data from a total of 266 completed surveys were collected by a market research firm. We adopted partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess both the measurement and structural components of the model. The results show that both information overload and system feature overload positively influence individuals’ shadow work. This study explores the concept of shadow work in the context of mobile shopping apps. Specifically, the study developed the relationships between the antecedents and consequences of shadow work in the mobile shopping context. The main contribution of our study is that it introduces an integrative model of shadow work in the mobile shopping context, highlighting the importance of shadow work.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Yul Ryoo & Sang-Cheol Park, 2021. "Antecedents and Consequences of Digital Shadow Work in Mobile Shopping Apps Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7697-:d:591514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weijters, B. & Schillewaert, N. & Rangarajan,D. & Falk, T., 2005. "Customers'usage of self service technology in retail setting," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2005-19, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    2. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    3. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Léon Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and usage of E-grocery shopping: A context-specific UTAUT2 model," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/324918, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Leo Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and Usage of E-Grocery Shopping: A Context-Specific UTAUT2 Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Ryan W. Buell & Michael I. Norton, 2011. "The Labor Illusion: How Operational Transparency Increases Perceived Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1564-1579, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Packiaraj Thangavel & Bibhas Chandra, 2023. "Two Decades of M-Commerce Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R Biblioshiny," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Leo Van Hove, 2022. "Consumer characteristics and e-grocery services: the primacy of the primary shopper," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 241-266, June.
    3. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Şemsettin Çiğdem & Bülent Yıldız & Sigitas Davidavicius, 2021. "The Effect of Perceptions on Service Robot Usage Intention: A Survey Study in the Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    5. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "Social Queues (Cues): Impact of Others’ Waiting in Line on One’s Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7958-7976, November.
    6. Ryan W. Buell, 2017. "Last Place Aversion in Queues," Harvard Business School Working Papers 18-053, Harvard Business School, revised Oct 2019.
    7. Karthik Balasubramanian & David F. Drake, 2015. "Service Quality, Inventory and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of Mobile Money Agents in Africa," Harvard Business School Working Papers 15-059, Harvard Business School, revised Oct 2015.
    8. Ruomeng Cui & Jun Li & Dennis J. Zhang, 2020. "Reducing Discrimination with Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Field Experiments on Airbnb," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1071-1094, March.
    9. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.
    10. Xiaofang Wang & Laurens G. Debo & Alan Scheller‐Wolf & Stephen F. Smith, 2012. "Service design at diagnostic service centers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(8), pages 613-628, December.
    11. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2017. "How Do Delay Announcements Shape Customer Behavior? An Empirical Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Chen, Jing & Yu, Bo & Chen, Bintong & Liu, Zhuojun, 2023. "Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Ulrich Gnewuch & Stefan Morana & Marc T. P. Adam & Alexander Maedche, 2022. "Opposing Effects of Response Time in Human–Chatbot Interaction," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 773-791, December.
    14. Zeugner-Roth, Katharina Petra & Bartsch, Fabian, 2020. "COO in print advertising: Developed versus developing market comparisons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 364-378.
    15. Locander, Jennifer A. & White, Allyn & Newman, Christopher L., 2020. "Customer responses to frontline employee complaining in retail service environments: The role of perceived impropriety," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 315-323.
    16. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2020. "Making the Wait Worthwhile: Experiments on the Effect of Queueing on Consumption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1149-1171, March.
    17. Seung Hyun Lee & Jaeyong Lee, 2018. "Nickel and dime guests for amenities: exploring guests’ perceptions of resort fees," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 20-31, February.
    18. repec:thr:techub:1008:y:2020:i:1:p:273-287 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Deepak Chawla & Himanshu Joshi, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Demographic Variables on Mobile Banking Adoption: An Empirical Investigation," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 90-113, June.
    20. Fei Gao & Xuanming Su, 2018. "Omnichannel Service Operations with Online and Offline Self-Order Technologies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3595-3608, August.
    21. Bertini, Marco & Buehler, Stefan & Halbheer, Daniel, 2020. "Pricing and Supply Chain Transparency to Conscientious Consumers," Economics Working Paper Series 2020, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7697-:d:591514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.