IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6262-d567244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Biochar Materials Derived from Coconut Husks and Various Types of Livestock Manure, and Their Potential for Use in Removal of H 2 S from Biogas

Author

Listed:
  • Lianghu Su

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Mei Chen

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Guihua Zhuo

    (Fujian Provincal Academy of Environmental Science, Fuzhou 350003, China)

  • Rongting Ji

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Saier Wang

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Longjiang Zhang

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Mingzhu Zhang

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Haidong Li

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

Abstract

As a potential adsorbent material, loose, porous livestock manure biochar provides a new approach to livestock manure resource utilization. In this study, coconut husks (CH) and livestock manure, i.e., cow dung (CD), pig manure (PM), and chicken manure (CM) were used as biomass precursors for preparation of biochar via high-temperature pyrolysis and CO 2 activation. Characterization technologies, such as scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, adsorption–desorption isotherms, and pore size distributions, were used to study the microscopic morphologies and physicochemical properties of unactivated and activated biochar materials. The results showed that CD biochar provides better adsorption performance (up to 29.81 mg H 2 S/g) than CM or PM biochar. After activation at 650° for 1 h, the best adsorption performance was 38.23 mg H 2 S/g. For comparison, the CH biochar removal performance was 30.44 mg H 2 S/g. Its best performance was 38.73 mg H 2 S/g after 1 h of activation at 750 °C. Its best removal performance is equivalent to that of CH biochar activated at a temperature that is 100 °C higher. Further material characterization indicates that the H 2 S removal performance of livestock-manure–derived biochar is not entirely dependent on the specific surface area, but is closely related to the pore size distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Lianghu Su & Mei Chen & Guihua Zhuo & Rongting Ji & Saier Wang & Longjiang Zhang & Mingzhu Zhang & Haidong Li, 2021. "Comparison of Biochar Materials Derived from Coconut Husks and Various Types of Livestock Manure, and Their Potential for Use in Removal of H 2 S from Biogas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6262-:d:567244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Muyang Tawie Sulok & Osumanu Haruna Ahmed & Choy Yuen Khew & Jarroop Augustine Mercer Zehnder & Mohamadu Boyie Jalloh & Adiza Alhassan Musah & Arifin Abdu, 2021. "Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Organic Amendments Produced from Selected Agro-Wastes with Potential for Sustaining Soil Health: A Laboratory Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Liu, Zhidan & Mohammadi, Ali & Angelidaki, Irini & Tsang, Daniel CW. & Zhang, Zengqiang & Pan, Junting & Ma, Lin & Ag, 2021. "A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Song, Jinghui & Wang, Ying & Zhang, Siqi & Song, Yanling & Xue, Shengrong & Liu, Le & Lvy, Xingang & Wang, Xiaojiao & Yang, Gaihe, 2021. "Coupling biochar with anaerobic digestion in a circular economy perspective: A promising way to promote sustainable energy, environment and agriculture development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoxian Zhang & Tingran Liu & Jichen Zhang & Ling Zhu, 2023. "Potential Mechanism of Long-Term Immobilization of Pb/Cd by Layered Double Hydroxide Doped Chicken-Manure Biochar," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, A. Naresh & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Masek, Ondrej & Priya, Anshu & Ki Lin, Carol Sze & Ok, Yong Sik & Kim, Sang-Hyoun, 2021. "Recent trends in biochar integration with anaerobic fermentation: Win-win strategies in a closed-loop," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Zhu, Xinyu & Pan, Junting & Tian, Hailin & Angelidaki, Irini, 2021. "Upcycling the anaerobic digestion streams in a bioeconomy approach: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Owais Ali Wani & Farida Akhter & Shamal Shasang Kumar & Subhash Babu & Raihana Habib Kanth & Shakeel Ahmad Mir & Syed Sheraz Mahdi & Abdul Raouf Malik & Shabir Bangroo & Abdel-Rhman Z. Gaafar & Simona, 2023. "Mitigating Soil Erosion through Biomass-Derived Biochar: Exploring the Influence of Feedstock Types and Pyrolysis Temperature," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Zhe Zhao & Xiangzheng Deng & Fan Zhang & Zhihui Li & Wenjiao Shi & Zhigang Sun & Xuezhen Zhang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Livestock Carrying Capacity Risk in Farmland from the Perspective of Planting and Breeding Balance in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Yung-Cheng Chang & Yen-Ju Pan & Tzu-Hsuan Huang & Ting-Hsun Hsiao & Liang-Yu Wei & Te-Hua Hsu, 2023. "Cultivation of Brackish Water Microalgae for Pig Manure Liquid Digestate Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Zeng, Yangmei & He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Li, Ping, 2023. "Adoption and ex-post impacts of sustainable manure management practices on income and happiness: Evidence from swine breeding farmers in rural Hubei, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    10. Florian Grassauer & Jannatul Ferdous & Nathan Pelletier, 2023. "Manure Valorization Using Black Soldier Fly Larvae: A Review of Current Systems, Production Characteristics, Utilized Feed Substrates, and Bioconversion and Nitrogen Conversion Efficiencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Malyan, Sandeep K. & Kumar, Smita S. & Fagodiya, Ram Kishor & Ghosh, Pooja & Kumar, Amit & Singh, Rajesh & Singh, Lakhveer, 2021. "Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroecosystem nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Liu, Hongbo & Wang, Xingkang & Fang, Yueying & Lai, Wenjia & Xu, Suyun & Lichtfouse, Eric, 2022. "Enhancing thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with biogas residue biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 465-475.
    14. Becker, C.M. & Marder, M. & Junges, E. & Konrad, O., 2022. "Technologies for biogas desulfurization - An overview of recent studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Yaashikaa, P.R. & Kumar, P. Senthil, 2022. "Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review," MPRA Paper 112234, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Richard Ochieng & Alemayehu Gebremedhin & Shiplu Sarker, 2022. "Integration of Waste to Bioenergy Conversion Systems: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.
    17. Song, Biao & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Tan, Xiaofei & Luo, Songhao & Xiong, Weiping & Zhou, Chengyun & Qin, Meng & Liu, Yang & Cheng, Min & Zeng, Guangming & Gong, Jilai, 2022. "Biochar-based agricultural soil management: An application-dependent strategy for contributing to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Néméhie Lawson & Merlin Alvarado-Morales & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Irini Angelidaki, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Jiaxin Lu & Atif Muhmood & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Xian Cui & Yuwen Guo & Yi Zheng & Yizhan Qiu & Pan Wang & Lianhai Ren, 2022. "Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling of Bioactive Compounds under Varying Digestate Storage Conditions: Assessment of Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Yanbo Wang & Boyao Zhi & Shumin Xiang & Guangxin Ren & Yongzhong Feng & Gaihe Yang & Xiaojiao Wang, 2023. "China’s Biogas Industry’s Sustainable Transition to a Low-Carbon Plan—A Socio-Technical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6262-:d:567244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.