IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i3p546-d1324510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Kadam

    (Department of Advanced Energy Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Sangyeol Jo

    (Department of Advanced Energy Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Jonghwa Lee

    (Department of Advanced Energy Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Kamonwan Khanthong

    (Department of Advanced Energy Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Heewon Jang

    (Department of Advanced Energy Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

  • Jungyu Park

    (Department of Advanced Energy Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

As the worldwide demand for meat per person is continuously increasing, there is a corresponding rise in the number of livestock animals, leading to an increase in livestock manure. Selecting appropriate treatment technologies for livestock manures is still a complex task and considerable debates over this issue persist. To develop a more comprehensive understanding of the manure treatment framework, this review was undertaken to assess the most utilized manure management technologies and underscore their respective challenges. Anaerobic digestion has become a commercial reality for treating livestock manures. However, the mono-digestion of single substrates comes with certain drawbacks associated with manure characteristics. Anaerobic co-digestion, involving the utilization of multiple feedstocks, holds the potential to overcome these limitations. Extensive research and development have underscored numerous intrinsic benefits of co-digestion. These include improved digestibility resulting from the synergistic effects of co-substrates and enhanced process stability. This review underscores the limitations associated with the mono-digestion of livestock manures and critically evaluates the advantages of their co-digestion with carbon-rich substrates. Additionally, this review delves into key livestock manure management practices globally, emphasizing the significance of co-digesting livestock manures while addressing the progress and challenges in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:546-:d:1324510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Liu, Zhidan & Mohammadi, Ali & Angelidaki, Irini & Tsang, Daniel CW. & Zhang, Zengqiang & Pan, Junting & Ma, Lin & Ag, 2021. "A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Jurado, E. & Antonopoulou, G. & Lyberatos, G. & Gavala, H.N. & Skiadas, I.V., 2016. "Continuous anaerobic digestion of swine manure: ADM1-based modelling and effect of addition of swine manure fibers pretreated with aqueous ammonia soaking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 190-198.
    3. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Jiseok Hong & Changwon Chae & Hyunjoong Kim & Hyeokjun Kwon & Jisu Kim & Ijung Kim, 2023. "Investigation to Enhance Solid Fuel Quality in Torrefaction of Cow Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Lehtomäki, A. & Huttunen, S. & Rintala, J.A., 2007. "Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 591-609.
    6. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers, 2023. "Possibilities and Limitations of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Animal Manure—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, May.
    7. Gahyun Baek & Danbee Kim & Jinsu Kim & Hanwoong Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2020. "Treatment of Cattle Manure by Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Food Waste and Pig Manure: Methane Yield and Synergistic Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Zhang, Yizhen & Jiang, Yan & Wang, Shun & Wang, Zhongzhong & Liu, Yanchen & Hu, Zhenhu & Zhan, Xinmin, 2021. "Environmental sustainability assessment of pig manure mono- and co-digestion and dynamic land application of the digestate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shivangi Jha & Sonil Nanda & Bishnu Acharya & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "A Review of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Biomass to Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Roberto Eloy Hernández Regalado & Jurek Häner & Elmar Brügging & Jens Tränckner, 2022. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Solid–Liquid Biogas Treatment Plants for the Agro-Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Hagos, Kiros & Zong, Jianpeng & Li, Dongxue & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1485-1496.
    5. Ammenberg, Jonas & Feiz, Roozbeh, 2017. "Assessment of feedstocks for biogas production, part II—Results for strategic decision making," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 388-404.
    6. Zhe Zhao & Xiangzheng Deng & Fan Zhang & Zhihui Li & Wenjiao Shi & Zhigang Sun & Xuezhen Zhang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Livestock Carrying Capacity Risk in Farmland from the Perspective of Planting and Breeding Balance in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Yung-Cheng Chang & Yen-Ju Pan & Tzu-Hsuan Huang & Ting-Hsun Hsiao & Liang-Yu Wei & Te-Hua Hsu, 2023. "Cultivation of Brackish Water Microalgae for Pig Manure Liquid Digestate Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    8. M. Herout & J. Malaťák & L. Kučera & T. Dlabaja, 2011. "Biogas composition depending on the type of plant biomass used," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 137-143.
    9. Gabrielle M. Myers & Daniel S. Andersen & Bobby J. Martens & D. Raj Raman, 2023. "Cost Assessment of Centralizing Swine Manure and Corn Stover Co-Digestion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Zeng, Yangmei & He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Li, Ping, 2023. "Adoption and ex-post impacts of sustainable manure management practices on income and happiness: Evidence from swine breeding farmers in rural Hubei, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Bułkowska, K. & Białobrzewski, I. & Klimiuk, E. & Pokój, T., 2018. "Kinetic parameters of volatile fatty acids uptake in the ADM1 as key factors for modeling co-digestion of silages with pig manure, thin stillage and glycerine phase," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 163-176.
    12. Florian Grassauer & Jannatul Ferdous & Nathan Pelletier, 2023. "Manure Valorization Using Black Soldier Fly Larvae: A Review of Current Systems, Production Characteristics, Utilized Feed Substrates, and Bioconversion and Nitrogen Conversion Efficiencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    14. M. Samer & E. M. Abdelsalam & S. Mohamed & H. Elsayed & Y. Attia, 2022. "Impact of photoactivated cobalt oxide nanoparticles addition on manure and whey for biogas production through dry anaerobic co-digestion," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7776-7793, June.
    15. Kumar, A. Naresh & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Masek, Ondrej & Priya, Anshu & Ki Lin, Carol Sze & Ok, Yong Sik & Kim, Sang-Hyoun, 2021. "Recent trends in biochar integration with anaerobic fermentation: Win-win strategies in a closed-loop," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Yaashikaa, P.R. & Kumar, P. Senthil, 2022. "Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review," MPRA Paper 112234, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Richard Ochieng & Alemayehu Gebremedhin & Shiplu Sarker, 2022. "Integration of Waste to Bioenergy Conversion Systems: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Sivabalan Kaniapan & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Kartikeyan Patma Nesan & Haris Nalakath Abubackar & Hadiza Aminu Umar & Temidayo Lekan Oladosu & Segun R. Bello & Eldon R. Rene, 2022. "A Review of the Sustainable Utilization of Rice Residues for Bioenergy Conversion Using Different Valorization Techniques, Their Challenges, and Techno-Economic Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    19. Néméhie Lawson & Merlin Alvarado-Morales & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Irini Angelidaki, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Jiaxin Lu & Atif Muhmood & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Xian Cui & Yuwen Guo & Yi Zheng & Yizhan Qiu & Pan Wang & Lianhai Ren, 2022. "Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling of Bioactive Compounds under Varying Digestate Storage Conditions: Assessment of Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:546-:d:1324510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.