IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v118y2018icp335-342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures with corn stover or apple pulp for enhanced biogas production

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Kun
  • Liu, Ronghou
  • Cui, Shaofeng
  • Yu, Qiong
  • Ma, Ruijie

Abstract

Corn stover (CS) or apple pulp (AP) were used to improve the anaerobic digestion performance of chicken manure (CM) or pig manure (PM), with the aim of adjusting carbon/nitrogen ratio and increasing the system stability compared to animal manures alone. This study was conducted in batch and semi-continuously fed digester at laboratory scale. The results of batch tests showed that the optimal mixture ratios for CM/CS, CM/AP, PM/CS and PM/AP were 4:1, 2:1, 4:1, 4:1, respectively. In the semi-continuous mode, inhibition to methane generation occurred when organic loading rate (OLR) of manures mono-digestion was higher than 2.4 g VS L−1d−1. However, the co-digestion of chicken manure with apple pulp at ratio 2 allowed operation at OLR of 4.8 g VS L−1d−1 and obtained the highest specific methane production (0.34 L g−1 VSadded), due to its enhanced buffer capacity and nutrient balance. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that the microbial community in digester fed with CM/AP mix was dominated by Methanosarcina and the remaining microorganisms mainly belonged to Methanobacteriales, both of which reflected the tolerance of inhibitors in this system. However, in digesters with other mixture (CM/CS, PM/CS, PM/AP), the negative impact of high levels ammonia and volatile fatty acids on sensitive Methanogenic Archaea resulted in serious decrease in the dominant species and finally caused the failure of anaerobic digestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Cui, Shaofeng & Yu, Qiong & Ma, Ruijie, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures with corn stover or apple pulp for enhanced biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 335-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:118:y:2018:i:c:p:335-342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148117311254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Ling & Zhao, Lixin & Ren, Changshan & Wang, Fei, 2012. "The progress and prospects of rural biogas production in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 58-63.
    2. Molinuevo-Salces, Beatriz & González-Fernández, Cristina & Gómez, Xiomar & García-González, María Cruz & Morán, Antonio, 2012. "Vegetable processing wastes addition to improve swine manure anaerobic digestion: Evaluation in terms of methane yield and SEM characterization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 36-42.
    3. Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Sun, Chen, 2016. "A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 857-865.
    4. Thamsiriroj, T. & Nizami, A.S. & Murphy, J.D., 2012. "Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long term operation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Zhou, Jialiang & Qu, Anan & Ming, Siqi & Zhang, Yuanhui & Duan, Na, 2022. "Binary-component anaerobic co-digestion: Synergies and microbial profiles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 1-10.
    3. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Liu, Zhidan & Mohammadi, Ali & Angelidaki, Irini & Tsang, Daniel CW. & Zhang, Zengqiang & Pan, Junting & Ma, Lin & Ag, 2021. "A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Tariq Alkhrissat & Ghada Kassab & Mu’tasim Abdel-Jaber, 2023. "Impact of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Manure and Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Zhou, Jialiang & Zhang, Yuanhui & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na, 2021. "Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    6. Addam Claes & Lucy Melchi & Sibel Uludag-Demirer & Goksel N. Demirer, 2021. "Supplementation of Carbon-Based Conductive Materials and Trace Metals to Improve Biogas Production from Apple Pomace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Kinga Borek & Wacław Romaniuk & Kamil Roman & Michał Roman & Maciej Kuboń, 2021. "The Analysis of a Prototype Installation for Biogas Production from Chosen Agricultural Substrates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Jae Hoon Jeung & Woo Jin Chung & Soon Woong Chang, 2019. "Evaluation of Anaerobic Co-Digestion to Enhance the Efficiency of Livestock Manure Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Bipasyana Dhungana & Sunil Prasad Lohani & Michael Marsolek, 2022. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Khayum, Naseem & Anbarasu, S. & Murugan, S., 2018. "Biogas potential from spent tea waste: A laboratory scale investigation of co-digestion with cow manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 760-768.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    3. Neshat, Soheil A. & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Najafpour, Ghasem D. & Lahijani, Pooya, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 308-322.
    4. Wang, Fang & Zhang, Deli & Shen, Xiuli & Liu, Weidong & Yi, Weiming & Li, Zhihe & Liu, Shanjian, 2019. "Synchronously electricity generation and degradation of biogas slurry using microbial fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 158-166.
    5. Wang, Jun & Xue, Qingwen & Guo, Ting & Mei, Zili & Long, Enshen & Wen, Qian & Huang, Wei & Luo, Tao & Huang, Ruyi, 2018. "A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 64-73.
    6. Sun, Dingqiang & Bai, Junfei & Qiu, Huanguang & Cai, Yaqing, 2014. "Impact of government subsidies on household biogas use in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 748-756.
    7. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    10. Lübken, Manfred & Koch, Konrad & Gehring, Tito & Horn, Harald & Wichern, Marc, 2015. "Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 352-360.
    11. Łukasz Sobol & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Alessandro Suardi & Rainer Preißmann, 2021. "Analysis of the Possibility of Energetic Utilization of Biomass Obtained from Grass Mowing of a Large-Area Golf Course—A Case Study of Tuscany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Hagos, Kiros & Zong, Jianpeng & Li, Dongxue & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1485-1496.
    13. Ormaechea, P. & Castrillón, L. & Suárez-Peña, B. & Megido, L. & Fernández-Nava, Y. & Negral, L. & Marañón, E. & Rodríguez-Iglesias, J., 2018. "Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure pretreated and/or co-digested at pilot-plant scale. Characterization by SEM," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 897-904.
    14. Liu, Hongzhao & Wang, Yuzhang & Yu, Tao & Liu, Hecong & Cai, Weiwei & Weng, Shilie, 2020. "Effect of carbon dioxide content in biogas on turbulent combustion in the combustor of micro gas turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1299-1311.
    15. Takata, Miki & Fukushima, Kazuyo & Kawai, Minako & Nagao, Norio & Niwa, Chiaki & Yoshida, Teruaki & Toda, Tatsuki, 2013. "The choice of biological waste treatment method for urban areas in Japan—An environmental perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 557-567.
    16. Ó Céileachair, Dónal & O'Shea, Richard & Murphy, Jerry D. & Wall, David M., 2021. "Alternative energy management strategies for large industry in non-gas-grid regions using on-farm biomethane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    17. Robyn Meeks & Katharine R. E. Sims & Hope Thompson, 2019. "Waste Not: Can Household Biogas Deliver Sustainable Development?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(3), pages 763-794, March.
    18. Pérez, Irene & Garfí, Marianna & Cadena, Erasmo & Ferrer, Ivet, 2014. "Technical, economic and environmental assessment of household biogas digesters for rural communities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 313-318.
    19. Yang, Sen & Liu, Ziduo, 2014. "Pilot-scale biodegradation of swine manure via Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) for biodiesel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 385-391.
    20. Li, Demao & Tang, Ruohao & Yu, Liang & Chen, Limei & Chen, Shulin & Xu, Song & Gao, Feng, 2020. "Effects of increasing organic loading rates on reactor performance and the methanogenic community in a new pilot upflow solid reactor for continuously processing food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 420-429.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:118:y:2018:i:c:p:335-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.