IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6099-d564595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Planning Tool for Reliability Assessment of Overhead Distribution Lines in Hybrid AC/DC Grids

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna Adinolfi

    (Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, ENEA, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Roberto Ciavarella

    (Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, ENEA, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Giorgio Graditi

    (Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, ENEA, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonio Ricca

    (Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, ENEA, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Maria Valenti

    (Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, ENEA, 00196 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Integration of DC grids into AC networks will realize hybrid AC/DC grids, a new energetic paradigm which will become widespread in the future due to the increasing availability of DC-based generators, loads and storage systems. Furthermore, the huge connection of intermittent renewable sources to distribution grids could cause security and congestion issues affecting line behaviour and reliability performance. This paper aims to propose a planning tool for congestion forecasting and reliability assessment of overhead distribution lines. The tool inputs consist of a single line diagram of a real or synthetic grid and a set of 24-h forecasting time series concerning climatic conditions and grid resource operative profiles. The developed approach aims to avoid congestions criticalities, taking advantage of optimal active power dispatching among “congestion-nearby resources”. A case study is analysed to validate the implemented control strategy considering a modified IEEE 14-Bus System with introduction of renewables. The tool also implements reliability prediction formulas to calculate an overhead line reliability function in congested and congestions-avoided conditions. A quantitative evaluation underlines the reliability performance achievable after the congestion strategy action.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Adinolfi & Roberto Ciavarella & Giorgio Graditi & Antonio Ricca & Maria Valenti, 2021. "A Planning Tool for Reliability Assessment of Overhead Distribution Lines in Hybrid AC/DC Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6099-:d:564595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirth, Lion & Ueckerdt, Falko & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2015. "Integration costs revisited – An economic framework for wind and solar variability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 925-939.
    2. Diana Enescu & Pietro Colella & Angela Russo, 2020. "Thermal Assessment of Power Cables and Impacts on Cable Current Rating: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-36, October.
    3. K. Durga Rao & V.V.S. Sanyasi Rao & A. K. Verma & A. Srividya, 2010. "Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis: Simulation Approach," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Javier Faulin & Angel A. Juan & Sebastián Martorell & José-Emmanuel Ramírez-Márquez (ed.), Simulation Methods for Reliability and Availability of Complex Systems, chapter 0, pages 41-64, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong Yu & Shan Gao & Xin Zhao & Yu Liu & Sicheng Wang & Tiancheng E. Song, 2023. "Alternating Iterative Power-Flow Algorithm for Hybrid AC–DC Power Grids Incorporating LCCs and VSCs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levi, Peter G. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2015. "Cost trajectories of low carbon electricity generation technologies in the UK: A study of cost uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    3. Batalla-Bejerano, Joan & Costa-Campi, Maria Teresa & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2016. "Collateral effects of liberalisation: Metering, losses, load profiles and cost settlement in Spain’s electricity system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 421-431.
    4. Zahari, Teuku Naraski & McLellan, Benjamin Craig, 2024. "Sustainability of Indonesia's transportation sector energy and resources demand under the low carbon transition strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    5. Chen, Hao & Gao, Xin-Ya & Liu, Jian-Yu & Zhang, Qian & Yu, Shiwei & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yan, Rui & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "The grid parity analysis of onshore wind power in China: A system cost perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-30.
    6. Ruhnau, Oliver & Hirth, Lion & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2020. "Heating with wind: Economics of heat pumps and variable renewables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Ivonne Pena Cabra & Arun K. S. Iyengar & Kirk Labarbara & Robert Wallace & John Brewer, 2025. "Decarbonization of the Power Sector with CCS: Case Study in Two Regions in the U.S., MISO North and SPP RTO West," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-43, September.
    8. Neda Hajibandeh & Mehdi Ehsan & Soodabeh Soleymani & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P. S. Catalão, 2017. "The Mutual Impact of Demand Response Programs and Renewable Energies: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Herath, N. & Tyner, W.E., 2019. "Intended and unintended consequences of US renewable energy policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Munoz, Francisco D. & Pumarino, Bruno J. & Salas, Ignacio A., 2017. "Aiming low and achieving it: A long-term analysis of a renewable policy in Chile," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 304-314.
    11. Lindhe, Andreas & Norberg, Tommy & Rosén, Lars, 2012. "Approximate dynamic fault tree calculations for modelling water supply risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 61-71.
    12. Patrycjusz Zarębski & Dominik Katarzyński, 2023. "A Theoretical Framework for a Local Energy Innovation System Based on the Renewable Energy Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Soria, Rafael & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Szklo, Alexandre & Milani, Rodrigo & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2015. "Hybrid concentrated solar power (CSP)–biomass plants in a semiarid region: A strategy for CSP deployment in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 57-72.
    14. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    15. López Prol, Javier & Zilberman, David, 2023. "No alarms and no surprises: Dynamics of renewable energy curtailment in California," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    16. Jiang, Yibo & Xu, Jian & Sun, Yuanzhang & Wei, Congying & Wang, Jing & Liao, Siyang & Ke, Deping & Li, Xiong & Yang, Jun & Peng, Xiaotao, 2018. "Coordinated operation of gas-electricity integrated distribution system with multi-CCHP and distributed renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 237-248.
    17. Coker, Phil J. & Bloomfield, Hannah C. & Drew, Daniel R. & Brayshaw, David J., 2020. "Interannual weather variability and the challenges for Great Britain’s electricity market design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 509-522.
    18. Vijay, Avinash & Fouquet, Nicolas & Staffell, Iain & Hawkes, Adam, 2017. "The value of electricity and reserve services in low carbon electricity systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 111-123.
    19. Mai, Trieu & Lopez, Anthony & Mowers, Matthew & Lantz, Eric, 2021. "Interactions of wind energy project siting, wind resource potential, and the evolution of the U.S. power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    20. Reichenberg, Lina & Hedenus, Fredrik & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "The marginal system LCOE of variable renewables – Evaluating high penetration levels of wind and solar in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 914-924.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6099-:d:564595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.