IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5641-d556931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Balanced Scorecard Is Implemented in the Spanish Footwear Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Suárez-Gargallo

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente, Spain)

  • Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente, Spain)

Abstract

This paper provides a deeper knowledge of the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in the Spanish footwear industry, under an exploratory research which has been conducted with a final sample of seven firms. An online questionnaire was developed, supported by phone calls and a personal interview. An 18–24-month-period has been found to be enough to develop solid foundations for a BSC. Financial and non-financial measures are presented in the whole firms and in the majority of the four perspectives, linked by cause-and-effect relationships, showing a high development in the BSC implementation. BSCs with a high grade of development are more likely to identify their intangibles as well as include them in the firm’s strategy. A personal BSC has been identified as a limitation. Although the strategy is spread out with meetings in the whole firms, it is not known at all levels, showing a gap to be fulfilled. Strategy maps are key in BCS implementation: they are present in the majority of the firms and show that the performance drivers reach the strategy. Firms with a high grade of development and expectation, using both financial and non-financial measures linked by cause-and-effect relationships, are more likely to define sustainable measures, integrating them in their own BSC.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Suárez-Gargallo & Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez, 2021. "How the Balanced Scorecard Is Implemented in the Spanish Footwear Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5641-:d:556931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agostino, Deborah & Arnaboldi, Michela, 2012. "Design issues in Balanced Scorecards: The “what” and “how” of control," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 327-339.
    2. Hyung Jong Na & Kun Chang Lee & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim, 2020. "Exploring CEO Messages in Sustainability Management Reports: Applying Sentiment Mining and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Lorenzo Lucianetti, 2010. "The impact of the strategy maps on balanced scorecard performance," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 21-36.
    4. Banker, Rajiv D. & Chang, Hsihui & Pizzini, Mina, 2011. "The judgmental effects of strategy maps in balanced scorecard performance evaluations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 259-279.
    5. Antonsen, Yngve, 2014. "The downside of the Balanced Scorecard: A case study from Norway," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 40-50.
    6. Susanna Falle & Romana Rauter & Sabrina Engert & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2016. "Sustainability Management with the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard in SMEs: Findings from an Austrian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Robert S. Kaplan, 2010. "Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-074, Harvard Business School.
    8. Azman ISMAIL & Mohd Ridwan ABD RAZAK, 2016. "Effect Of Job Satisfaction On Organizational Commitment," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 25-40, May.
    9. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    10. Wu, Ing-Long & Chen, Jian-Liang, 2014. "A stage-based diffusion of IT innovation and the BSC performance impact: A moderator of technology–organization–environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 76-90.
    11. Ukko, J. & Tenhunen, J. & Rantanen, H., 2007. "Performance measurement impacts on management and leadership: Perspectives of management and employees," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 39-51, October.
    12. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S. O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2007. "Relations among Measures, Climate of Control, and Performance Measurement Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 935-982, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suárez-Gargallo, Carlos & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2023. "A comprehensive bibliometric study of the balanced scorecard," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Madsen, Dag Øivind & Stenheim, Tonny, 2014. "Balansert målstyring: En kort oversikt over forskningslitteraturen [The Balanced Scorecard: A brief overview of the research literature]," MPRA Paper 65991, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Muhammad Rafiq & Saif Maqbool & José Moleiro Martins & Mário Nuno Mata & Rui Miguel Dantas & Shumaila Naz & Anabela Batista Correia, 2021. "A Study on Balanced Scorecard and Its Impact on Sustainable Development of Renewable Energy Organizations; A Mediating Role of Political and Regulatory Institutions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Ralph Kober & Deryl Northcott, 2021. "Testing cause‐and‐effect relationships within a balanced scorecard," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1815-1849, April.
    5. Patrizia Di Tullio & Matteo La Torre & Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2021. "Toward performance measurement systems based on business models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 1), pages 97-122.
    6. Suaad Jassem & Anna Azmi & Zarina Zakaria, 2018. "Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Francesca Francioli, 2018. "Strategic performance management systems in Italian banks. A research note," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 155-178.
    8. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Determinants of successful adoption of the Balanced Scorecard in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises," OSF Preprints 5hx2r, Center for Open Science.
    9. Maria José Gomes & António Sousa & Jorge Novas & Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability in Viticulture as a Balanced Scorecard Perspective of the Wine Industry: Evidence for the Portuguese Region of Alentejo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Svitlana Firsova, 2017. "Examining Institutional Content Of The Balanced Scorecard: Logics And Translations In Ukrainian Business Environment," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 8(2).
    11. Erlin Trisyulianti & Budhi Prihartono & Made Andriani & Kadarsah Suryadi, 2023. "A conceptual framework for a value‐based sustainability balanced scorecard," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1536-1552, June.
    12. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Andrea Appolloni, 2019. "Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Iman Adeinat, 2019. "Mediating Effects between Perspectives in Strategy Maps," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, February.
    14. repec:vul:omefvu:v:9:y:2017:i:2:id:229 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Kyriaki Papadopoulou, 2020. "Comparative Review Of Performance Measurement Methods Effectiveness," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 127-139.
    16. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. David Carassus & Damien Gardey & Christophe Maurel, 2011. "Les démarches locales de performance publique face à la LOLF : mimétisme ou innovation ?," Post-Print hal-02431106, HAL.
    19. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    20. Martínez-Caro, Eva & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Alfonso-Ruiz, Francisco Javier, 2020. "Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    21. Deborah Agostino & Michela Arnaboldi, 2015. "How Performance Measurement Systems Support Managerial Actions in Networks: Evidence from an Italian Case Study," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 117-137, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5641-:d:556931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.