IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2414-d334396.html

Creating a Sustainable Workplace Environment: Influence of Workplace Safety Climate on Chinese Healthcare Employees’ Presenteeism from the Perspective of Affect and Cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Beini Liu

    (School of Business, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Qiang Lu

    (School of Business, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

Based on the stimulus-organism-response theory and cognitive-affective personality system theory, this paper explores how the theoretical model of the workplace safety climate (WSC) influences presenteeism. Affect-based trust and cognition-based trust are assessed, and the situational role of organization formalization is examined. Using a time-lagged research design, data from 396 healthcare employees were gathered and multiple regression and bootstrapping were used to test each hypothesis. The results show that: (1) WSC significantly reduces presenteeism. (2) Both affect-based trust and cognition-based trust mediate the relationship between WSC and presenteeism. Affect-based trust exerts a complete mediating role, while cognition-based trust exerts a partial mediating role. (3) Cognition-based trust completely mediates the relationship between affect-based trust and presenteeism. (4) Organization formalization exerts a positive moderating effect on the relationship between WSC and affect-based trust. However, it exerts no significant moderating effect on the relationship between WSC and cognition-based trust. This study overcame the single research perspective. Combined with organizational, work-related, and person-related factors, the internal logic of the impact of WSC on the decision-making process in presenteeism was identified. The research results provide practical information for enterprises to create a sustainable organizational environment, reduce risks related to human resources, and effectively manage organizational health.

Suggested Citation

  • Beini Liu & Qiang Lu, 2020. "Creating a Sustainable Workplace Environment: Influence of Workplace Safety Climate on Chinese Healthcare Employees’ Presenteeism from the Perspective of Affect and Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2414-:d:334396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    2. Samuel Aryee & Li-Yun Sun & Zhen Xiong George Chen & Yaw A. Debrah, 2008. "Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 4(3), pages 393-411, November.
    3. Guadalupe Vila-Vázquez & Carmen Castro-Casal & Dolores Álvarez-Pérez & Luisa Del Río-Araújo, 2018. "Promoting the Sustainability of Organizations: Contribution of Transformational Leadership to Job Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Maria De Paola & Vincenzo Scoppa & Valeria Pupo, 2014. "Absenteeism in the Italian Public Sector: The Effects of Changes in Sick Leave Policy," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(2), pages 337-360.
    5. Johnson, Devon & Grayson, Kent, 2005. "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 500-507, April.
    6. Zhou, Qin & Martinez, Luis F. & Ferreira, Aristides I. & Rodrigues, Piedade, 2016. "Supervisor support, role ambiguity and productivity associated with presenteeism: A longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3380-3387.
    7. Aryee, Samuel & Sun, Li-Yun & Chen, Zhen Xiong George & Debrah, Yaw A., 2008. "Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 393-411, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Folke, Filippa & Melin, Marika, 2022. "Selecting flight mode – Risk factors associated with presenteeism among commercial pilots and the role of depressive symptoms," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beini Liu & Qiang Lu & Yue Zhao & Jing Zhan, 2020. "Can the Psychosocial Safety Climate Reduce Ill-Health Presenteeism? Evidence from Chinese Healthcare Staff under a Dual Information Processing Path Lens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Wei-Li Wu & Yi-Chih Lee, 2020. "Do Work Engagement and Transformational Leadership Facilitate Knowledge Sharing? A Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Iftikhar Hussain & Shahab Ali & Farrukh Shahzad & Muhammad Irfan & Yong Wan & Zeeshan Fareed & Li Sun, 2022. "RETRACTED: Abusive Supervision Impact on Employees’ Creativity: A Mediated-Moderated Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Min-Kyu Joo & Jia Yu & Leanne Atwater, 2025. "Goal-focused abusive leaders: The mitigating role of conscientiousness in subordinates’ counterproductive work behavior," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 408-430, May.
    5. Budhi Haryanto & Edi Cahyono, 2019. "Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Performance: The Role of Gender," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 305-311.
    6. De Clercq, Dirk & Haq, Inam Ul & Azeem, Muhammad Umer & Raja, Usman, 2018. "Family incivility, emotional exhaustion at work, and being a good soldier: The buffering roles of waypower and willpower," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 27-36.
    7. Shahid Khan, 2021. "Do workplace contextual factors engender abusive supervision?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(1), pages 132-150, February.
    8. Maie Stein & Sylvie Vincent-Höper & Marlies Schümann & Sabine Gregersen, 2020. "Beyond Mistreatment at the Relationship Level: Abusive Supervision and Illegitimate Tasks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Shahab Ali & Pu Yongjian & Farrukh Shahzad & Iftikhar Hussain & Dawei Zhang & Zeeshan Fareed & Filza Hameed & Chunlei Wang, 2022. "Abusive Supervision and Turnover Intentions: A Mediation-Moderation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Yucheng Zhang & Timothy C. Bednall, 2016. "Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 455-471, December.
    11. Xiaodong Ming & Xinwen Bai & Jingyu Fu & Jianfeng Yang, 2025. "Decreasing Workplace Unethical Behavior Through Mindfulness: A Study Based on the Dual-System Theory of Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 189-207, January.
    12. Qin Xu & Guangxi Zhang & Andrew Chan, 2019. "Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Joint Moderating Roles of Organizational Identification and Positive Affectivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 829-843, July.
    13. Allan B. I. Bernardo & Mary Angeline A. Daganzo & Anna Carmella G. Ocampo, 2018. "Abusive Supervision and Well-Being of Filipino Migrant Workers in Macau: Consequences for Self-Esteem and Heritage Culture Detachment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 277-292, August.
    14. Guanxing Xiong & Huadong Huang & Yingyi Ma & Cuiqi Liang & Haixia Wang, 2021. "Abusive Supervision and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Mediating Role of Status Challenge and the Moderating Role of Leader–Member Exchange," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    15. Yoshida, Diah Tuhfat & Sendjaya, Sen & Hirst, Giles & Cooper, Brian, 2014. "Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1395-1404.
    16. Cihangir Gümüştaş & Nilgün Karataş Gümüştaş, 2023. "Abusive Supervision and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderated Mediation Model of Burnout and Organizational Identity," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 135-159.
    17. Meng Xi & Shuming Zhao & Qin Xu, 2017. "The influence of CEO relationship-focused behaviors on firm performance: A chain-mediating role of employee relations climate and employees’ attitudes," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 173-192, March.
    18. Chen, Hao & Richard, Orlando C. & Dorian Boncoeur, O. & Ford, David L., 2020. "Work engagement, emotional exhaustion, and counterproductive work behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 30-41.
    19. Ahsan Ali & Hussain Tariq & Yanling Wang, 2025. "Finding the silver lining: why and when abusive supervision improves the objective service performance of abused employees," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 559-593, June.
    20. Liu, Pei & Mu, Yuting & Li, Xin, 2025. "How does perceived overqualification beget workplace incivility? A moderated mediation model based on Kahn’s framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2414-:d:334396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.