IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p2039-d329422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the Gap and Rating of Market Expectation Promote Innovation Input of China Manufacturers?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhangsheng Jiang

    (School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    Zheshang Research Institute, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Under the strategic background of Made-in-China to Mind-in-China, how the capital market expectation affects enterprise innovation input has reached no coincident conclusion. This paper uses Chinese A-share manufacturing listed companies from 2010 to 2017 to investigate the internal mechanism among the gap and rating of market expectation and enterprise innovation input, and further explores the moderating effects of institutional coverage and government subsidies. The results show that: firstly, innovation input will first decrease and then increase with the market expectation gap increase. However, innovation input will first increase and then decrease with the market expectation rating increase. Secondly, when the institutional coverage and government subsidies increase, innovation input will remarkably transform from the first decrease and then increase into the first increase, then decrease with the market expectation gap increase. Finally, when institutional coverage is high and government subsidies are low, innovation input will remarkably transform from the first increase and then decrease into the first decrease, and then increase with the market expectation rating increases. These research findings can provide some academic support and policy references for managers to deal with effectively external performance pressures, institutional coverage, and optimize government subsidies to promote manufacturers’ innovation-driven upgrading.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhangsheng Jiang, 2020. "Can the Gap and Rating of Market Expectation Promote Innovation Input of China Manufacturers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2039-:d:329422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ederer, Florian & Manso, Gustavo, 2009. "Is Pay-For-Performance Detrimental to Innovation?," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt03t787q9, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    2. Lv, David Diwei & Chen, Weihong & Zhu, Hang & Lan, Hailin, 2019. "How does inconsistent negative performance feedback affect the R&D investments of firms? A study of publicly listed firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 151-162.
    3. Malmendier, Ulrike & Shanthikumar, Devin, 2007. "Are small investors naive about incentives?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 457-489, August.
    4. Guo, Di & Guo, Yan & Jiang, Kun, 2016. "Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1129-1144.
    5. Cornaggia, Jess & Mao, Yifei & Tian, Xuan & Wolfe, Brian, 2015. "Does banking competition affect innovation?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 189-209.
    6. David Hirshleifer & Angie Low & Siew Hong Teoh, 2012. "Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(4), pages 1457-1498, August.
    7. Tuomas Takalo & Tanja Tanayama, 2010. "Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 16-41, February.
    8. John Shon & Meng Yan, 2015. "R&D Cuts and Subsequent Reversals: Meeting or Beating Quarterly Analyst Forecasts," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 147-166, May.
    9. Maria Aristizabal-Ramirez & Maria Camila Botero-Franco & Gustavo Canavire-Bacarreza, 2017. "Does Financial Development Promote Innovation in Developing Economies? An Empirical Analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 475-496, August.
    10. Hüseyin Doluca & Marcus Wagner & Jörn Block, 2018. "Sustainability and Environmental Behaviour in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Environment‐Related Activities, Innovation and Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 152-172, January.
    11. Kevin M. Murphy & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 2008. "Why Is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth?," Springer Books, in: Roger D. Congleton & Kai A. Konrad & Arye L. Hillman (ed.), 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 2, pages 213-218, Springer.
    12. Henrich R. Greve, 2003. "Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: evidence from shipbuilding," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(5), pages 1051-1076, October.
    13. Li Li & Jean Chen & Hongli Gao & Li Xie, 2019. "The certification effect of government R&D subsidies on innovative entrepreneurial firms’ access to bank finance: evidence from China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 241-259, January.
    14. Zahra, Shaker A. & Hayton, James C., 2008. "The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 195-220, March.
    15. Zhenji Jin & Yue Shang & Jian Xu, 2018. "The Impact of Government Subsidies on Private R&D and Firm Performance: Does Ownership Matter in China’s Manufacturing Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Bernini, Cristina & Pellegrini, Guido, 2011. "How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 253-265, May.
    17. Kleer, Robin, 2010. "Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1361-1374, December.
    18. Florian Ederer & Gustavo Manso, 2013. "Is Pay for Performance Detrimental to Innovation?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(7), pages 1496-1513, July.
    19. Shawn X. Huang & Raynolde Pereira & Changjiang Wang, 2017. "Analyst Coverage and the Likelihood of Meeting or Beating Analyst Earnings Forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 871-899, June.
    20. Xie, En & Huang, Yuanyuan & Stevens, Charles E. & Lebedev, Sergey, 2019. "Performance feedback and outward foreign direct investment by emerging economy firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    21. Lerner, Josh, 1999. "The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the SBIR Program," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 285-318, July.
    22. Pino G. Audia & Henrich R. Greve, 2006. "Less Likely to Fail: Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 83-94, January.
    23. Lu Y. Zhang & Melissa Toffanin, 2018. "The information environment of the firm and the market valuation of R&D," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9-10), pages 1051-1081, October.
    24. Octavian-Dragomir JORA & Alexandru BUTISEACÃ & Mihaela IACOB, 2017. "Seeking Truth from Facts and Figures Only? The Logic of Economics and China’s Miracles," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(5), pages 545-562, December.
    25. Marina Ranga & Henry Etzkowitz, 2012. "Great Expectations: An Innovation Solution to the Contemporary Economic Crisis," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1429-1438, May.
    26. Russell Thomson & Paul Jensen, 2013. "The Effects of Government Subsidies on Business R&D Employment: Evidence From Oecd Countries," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 66(2), pages 281-310, June.
    27. Manzhi Liu & Liyuan Liu & Shichun Xu & Mingwei Du & Xianxian Liu & Yanqin Zhang, 2019. "The Influences of Government Subsidies on Performance of New Energy Firms: A Firm Heterogeneity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    28. Sung, Jin Kyung & Park, Jimi & Yoo, Shijin, 2019. "Exploring the impact of strategic emphasis on advertising versus R&D during stock market downturns and upturns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 56-64.
    29. Castaño, María-Soledad & Méndez, María-Teresa & Galindo, Miguel-Ángel, 2016. "Innovation, internationalization and business-growth expectations among entrepreneurs in the services sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1690-1695.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ge Ge & Xiang Xiao & Zhenzhu Li & Qinghui Dai, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Promote High-Quality Development of Enterprises in China? The Mediating Role of Innovation Input," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellucci, Andrea & Pennacchio, Luca & Zazzaro, Alberto, 2023. "Debt financing of SMEs: The certification role of R&D Subsidies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Licheng Zheng & Delong Luo & Ruiqing Jiang & Xiaoyong Lu, 2025. "The Strategy of Speculative Innovation: the Result of Capital Misallocation and Defective Incentive Policy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12317-12363, September.
    3. Hu, Yefei & Liu, Dayong, 2022. "Government as a non-financial participant in innovation: How standardization led by government promotes regional innovation performance in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Kotiloglu, Serhan & Blettner, Daniela & Lechler, Thomas G., 2024. "Integrating national culture into the organizational performance feedback theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 327-347.
    5. Daniel Bradley & Incheol Kim & Xuan Tian, 2017. "Do Unions Affect Innovation?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2251-2271, July.
    6. Xue Yang & Hao Zhang & Die Hu & Bingde Wu, 2023. "The timing dilemma: understanding the determinants of innovative startups’ patent collateralization for loans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 371-403, January.
    7. Qing Wan & Xiaoke Cheng & Kam C. Chan & Shenghao Gao, 2021. "Born to innovate? The birth‐order effect of CEOs on corporate innovation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(9-10), pages 1846-1888, October.
    8. Glaeser, Stephen, 2018. "The effects of proprietary information on corporate disclosure and transparency: Evidence from trade secrets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 163-193.
    9. Chen, Jin & Heng, Cheng Suang & Tan, Bernard C.Y. & Lin, Zhijie, 2018. "The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 108-120.
    10. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2019. "R&D Subsidies and Firms’ Debt Financing," CSEF Working Papers 527, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    11. Ziyang Li & Qianwei Ying & Wu Yan & Chenjun Fan, 2022. "Does just‐in‐time adoption have an impact on corporate innovation: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1599-1635, April.
    12. Lai, Shaojie & Yang, Laifeng & Wang, Qing & Anderson, Hamish D., 2023. "Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Xu, Zhe & Meng, Lu & He, Dan & Shi, Xiaoliang & Chen, Ke, 2022. "Government Support's signaling effect on credit financing for new-energy enterprises," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Yun‐an Bai, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation output: Empirical evidence based on Chinese listed companies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3534-3547, December.
    15. Liying Huang & Lerong He & Guangqing Yang, 2021. "Performance Shortfalls and R&D Investment Change: Aspirations, Actions, and Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Herz, Holger & Schunk, Daniel & Zehnder, Christian, 2014. "How do judgmental overconfidence and overoptimism shape innovative activity?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-23.
    17. Dongying Du & Xiaojian Tang & Huaiming Wang & Joseph H. Zhang & Stephanie Tsui & Dongjie Lin, 2022. "CEO organizational identification and corporate innovation investment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 4185-4217, September.
    18. Weiwei Gao & Ting Cao & Zhen Huang, 2021. "Do outsiders listen to insiders? The role of government support in market reactions to earnings announcements," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 781-795, June.
    19. Ahmad, Muhammad Farooq & Aziz, Saqib & Dowling, Michael & Kowalewski, Oskar, 2023. "Board reforms and innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Wu, Aihua, 2017. "The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 339-345.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2039-:d:329422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.