IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8286-d425056.html

Does Cultural Difference Matter on Social Media? An Examination of the Ethical Culture and Information Privacy Concerns

Author

Listed:
  • Sangmi Chai

    (Ewha School of Business, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Korea)

Abstract

While social media has become a very popular tool for sharing information and news worldwide, the ethical culture of the users emerged as a significant issue in cyber space. This research investigates the role of perceived ethical culture and information privacy concerns on social media behaviors. More importantly, this study investigates the role of cultural difference in the relationship among those factors. Based on the study results of U.S. and Korean social media users, this study found ethical culture to be positively associated and information privacy concerns negatively associated with users’ information-sharing behavior on social media. In addition, the study results indicated that the size of the impact of the two facts are varied between the two countries. This study’s results direct that users’ perceived ethical culture and privacy concerns are important factors affecting social media users’ information sharing. However, these factors could have a different impact with cultural differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangmi Chai, 2020. "Does Cultural Difference Matter on Social Media? An Examination of the Ethical Culture and Information Privacy Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8286-:d:425056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chieh-Peng Lin, 2007. "To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 411-428, February.
    2. Khammash, Marwan & Griffiths, Gareth Havard, 2011. "‘Arrivederci CIAO.com, Buongiorno Bing.com’—Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), antecedences and consequences," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 82-87.
    3. Mangold, W. Glynn & Faulds, David J., 2009. "Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 357-365, July.
    4. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & James Agarwal, 2004. "Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 336-355, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melović, Boban & Jocović, Mijat & Dabić, Marina & Vulić, Tamara Backović & Dudic, Branislav, 2020. "The impact of digital transformation and digital marketing on the brand promotion, positioning and electronic business in Montenegro," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Sakshi, & Tandon, Urvashi & Ertz, Myriam & Bansal, Harbhajan, 2020. "Social vacation: Proposition of a model to understand tourists’ usage of social media for travel planning," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Cheng, Junjun & Chen, Bo & Huang, Zihang, 2023. "Collective-based ad transparency in targeted hotel advertising: Consumers’ regulatory focus underlying the crowd safety effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    5. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    6. Corey Angst, 2009. "Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 169-178, November.
    7. Mario Silic & Andrea Back, 2016. "The Influence of Risk Factors in Decision-Making Process for Open Source Software Adoption," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 151-185, January.
    8. Cagla Pinar Utkutug & Erkan Yildiz, 2026. "Gaining Positive E-WOM Through Reputation Depending on Information Privacy Concerns in Banking Services: Moderation Roles of Boycott Participation and Boycott Frequency," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(1), pages 4-23, February.
    9. Yin Bai & Yan Wang & Xingyao Ren, 2025. "Big data or big brother: When is recontacting the digital customer OK?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 1624-1643, December.
    10. Angeliki Kitsiou & Charikleia Despotidi & Christos Kalloniatis & Stefanos Gritzalis, 2022. "The Role of Users’ Demographic and Social Attributes for Accepting Biometric Systems: A Greek Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, November.
    11. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    13. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. David Harborth & Sebastian Pape, 2020. "Empirically Investigating Extraneous Influences on the “APCO” Model—Childhood Brand Nostalgia and the Positivity Bias," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    16. Chetan A. Jhaveri & Jitendra M. Nenavani, 2020. "Evaluation of eTail Services Quality: AHP Approach," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 310-319, September.
    17. Polat Can & Ilker Çetin, 2017. "A Research on the Comparison of the Effect of Benefits Obtained from Social Media Marketing to Brand Commitment in Terms of Domestic and Foreign Consumers," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 29-42, February.
    18. Sindy Liu & Patsy Perry & Gregory Gadzinski, 2019. "The implications of digital marketing on WeChat for luxury fashion brands in China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 395-409, July.
    19. Weidong Li & Yalin Qin & Changjie Chen & Meng Wang, 2025. "An investigation into personal data sensitivity in the Internet of Everything—insights from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Tischer, Sven, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-064, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8286-:d:425056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.