IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7830-d417450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrelations among Leadership Competencies of BIM Leaders: A Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Armin Mirhosseini

    (School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran)

  • Reza Kiani Mavi

    (School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University (ECU), 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)

  • Neda Kiani Mavi

    (School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University (ECU), 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)

  • Behzad Abbasnejad

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Farzaneh Rayani

    (School of Urban Designing, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran)

Abstract

The use of new, digitally enabled innovations, such as building information modeling (BIM), raises issues such as the delineation of a competent leader. Even though BIM-based competency assessment models have become essential tools for maximizing the potential values of BIM implementation, the current competency models provide limited focus on leadership aspects that facilitate and enhance the BIM implementation efforts. This paper seeks to identify the specific competencies required for BIM implementation and examines the relationships between these competencies. Thirty-two experts from around the globe investigated a total of 15 leadership competencies under three categories pertaining to intellectual, managerial, and emotional leadership. Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) was implemented to examine the cause-and-effect relationships among the BIM leadership competencies and fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) was performed to weigh those competencies. Findings show that the intellectual competencies act as the cause group, while managerial and emotional competencies are the effect groups. Moreover, the involving leadership is found to be the more suitable leadership style for BIM professionals, given the current capability and maturity levels of BIM implementation, in order to deal with the required changes throughout the BIM implementation process. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge in the BIM domain to examine the associated leadership competencies by using the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique. The results of this research show the relative importance of criteria and sub-criteria, which contributes to further improvement of BIM leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Armin Mirhosseini & Reza Kiani Mavi & Neda Kiani Mavi & Behzad Abbasnejad & Farzaneh Rayani, 2020. "Interrelations among Leadership Competencies of BIM Leaders: A Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7830-:d:417450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehrdad Arashpour & Amin Heidarpour & Ali Akbar Nezhad & Zahra Hosseinifard & Nicholas Chileshe & Reza Hosseini, 2020. "Performance-based control of variability and tolerance in off-site manufacture and assembly: optimization of penalty on poor production quality," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 502-514, June.
    2. Hannes Lindblad, 2019. "Black boxing BIM: the public client’s strategy in BIM implementation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. da Silva, Filipa Pires & Jerónimo, Helena Mateus & Vieira, Pedro Rino, 2019. "Leadership competencies revisited: A causal configuration analysis of success in the requirements phase of information systems projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 688-696.
    4. Feng Wei & Yi Li & Yi Zhang & Shubo Liu, 2018. "The Interactive Effect of Authentic Leadership and Leader Competency on Followers’ Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 763-773, December.
    5. Reza Kiani Mavi & Navid Zarbakhshnia & Armin Khazraei, 2017. "A Fuzzy DEMATEL Analysis of Cultural Variables in Traffic Rules Violation," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 8(4), pages 69-85, October.
    6. Animesh Biswas & Samir Kumar, 2019. "Generalization of extent analysis method for solving multicriteria decision making problems involving intuitionistic fuzzy numbers," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(4), pages 1142-1166, December.
    7. Berna Bulgurcu, 2018. "An extent analysis of 3PL provider selection criteria: A case on Turkey cement sector," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1469183-146, January.
    8. Reza Kiani Mavi, 2015. "Green supplier selection: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ARAS approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 165-188.
    9. Reza Kiani Mavi, 2014. "Indicators of Entrepreneurial University: Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(2), pages 370-387, June.
    10. Phil Nixon & Megan Harrington & David Parker, 2012. "Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(2), pages 204-216, January.
    11. Yani Rahmawati & Christiono Utomo & Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi, 2019. "BIM and E-Negotiation Practices in AEC Consulting Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    13. Safar Fazli & Reza Kiani & Mohammadali Vosooghidizaji, 2015. "Crude oil supply chain risk management with DEMATEL–ANP," Post-Print hal-02327343, HAL.
    14. Timothy O. Olawumi & Daniel W.M. Chan, 2019. "Critical success factors for implementing building information modeling and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 587-602, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiyuan Yu & Wenli Liu & Lingli Qing & Di Zhang, 2023. "Improving Farm Cooperatives’ Performance and Sustainability: A Study of Agricultural Managers’ Competencies Based on the Grounded Theory and the fsQCA Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Kun Xu & Shuang Li & Jiao Liu & Cheng Lu & Guangzhe Xue & Zhengquan Xu & Chao He, 2022. "Evaluation Cloud Model of Spontaneous Combustion Fire Risk in Coal Mines by Fusing Interval Gray Number and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Naif Alaboud & Adnan Alshahrani, 2023. "Adoption of Building Information Modelling in the Saudi Construction Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Seda Tan & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Muhammed Zubeyr Tel & Merve Serter & Yusuf Berkay Metinal, 2022. "Modeling the Critical Success Factors for BIM Implementation in Developing Countries: Sampling the Turkish AEC Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navid Zarbakhshnia & Kannan Govindan & Devika Kannan & Mark Goh, 2023. "Outsourcing logistics operations in circular economy towards to sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 134-162, January.
    2. Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Laleh Katoueizadeh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2020. "Risk identification and prioritization in banking projects of payment service provider companies: an empirical study," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Benyou Jia & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Pingan Zhong & Zhongbo Yu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Best Compromise Decision Model for Real-Time Flood Mitigation Operations of Multi-Reservoir System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3363-3387, August.
    4. Azamudin Badri-Harun & Mohamed Radzi Zainol & Amzairi Amar & Zullina Hussain Shaari, 2016. "Emotional Intelligence as Mediator between Leadership Styles and Leadership Effectiveness: A Theoretical Framework," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 116-121.
    5. Beatriz Andres & Vicente Javier Blanes, 2020. "A Negotiation Approach to Support the Strategies Alignment Process in Collaborative Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Juan Carlos Martín & Veronika Rudchenko & María-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull, 2020. "The Role of Nationality and Hotel Class on Guests’ Satisfaction. A Fuzzy-TOPSIS Approach Applied in Saint Petersburg," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Jelena Lukić & Mirjana Misita & Dragan D. Milanović & Ankica Borota-Tišma & Aleksandra Janković, 2022. "Determining the Risk Level in Client Analysis by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Insurance Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Chen-Ming Lu, 2021. "A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Mohammad Reza Jalilvand & Leila Nasrolahi Vosta & Rashid Khalilakbar & Javad Khazaei Pool & Reihaneh Alsadat Tabaeeian, 2019. "The Effects of Internal Marketing and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation in Family Businesses," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 1064-1079, September.
    12. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    13. Qinglan Liu & Longjian Yang & Miying Yang, 2021. "Digitalisation for Water Sustainability: Barriers to Implementing Circular Economy in Smart Water Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    14. Lupo, Toni, 2015. "Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 249-259.
    15. Lixin Shen & Kannan Govindan & Madan Shankar, 2015. "Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, March.
    16. He-Yau Kang & Amy H. I. Lee & Tzu-Ting Huang, 2016. "Project Management for a Wind Turbine Construction by Applying Fuzzy Multiple Objective Linear Programming Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Noori, Amir & Bonakdari, Hossein & Salimi, Amir Hossein & Gharabaghi, Bahram, 2021. "A group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method for water supply choice optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    19. Animesh Biswas & Samir Kumar, 2019. "Generalization of extent analysis method for solving multicriteria decision making problems involving intuitionistic fuzzy numbers," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(4), pages 1142-1166, December.
    20. Bojan Srdjevic & Yvonilde Medeiros, 2008. "Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(7), pages 877-894, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7830-:d:417450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.