IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i18p3268-d910245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Risk Level in Client Analysis by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Insurance Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Lukić

    (Danube Insurance Company a.d.o, Makedonska 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Mirjana Misita

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragan D. Milanović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ankica Borota-Tišma

    (Belgrade Business and Arts Academy of Applied Studies, Kraljice Marije 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Janković

    (The Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, Katarine Ambrozić 3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to determine the risk level of a contract extension with the existing policyholders, which is further propagated to the business effectiveness and long-term sustainability of the company. The uncertainties in the relative importance of risk factors, their values, and risk levels are described by the linguistic forms, which are modeled by using the fuzzy sets theory. The evaluations of the relative importance of risk factors are stated as a fuzzy group decision-making problem. The weights of risk factors are obtained by using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. The determination of production rules for the assessment of the risk level is based on fuzzy IF-THAN rules. The verification of the model is performed by using real-life data originating from the insurance company which operates in the Republic of Serbia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Lukić & Mirjana Misita & Dragan D. Milanović & Ankica Borota-Tišma & Aleksandra Janković, 2022. "Determining the Risk Level in Client Analysis by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Insurance Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:18:p:3268-:d:910245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/18/3268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/18/3268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milena Jakšić & Slaviša Moljević & Aleksandar Aleksić & Mirjana Misita & Slavko Arsovski & Danijela Tadić & Predrag Mimović, 2016. "Fuzzy Approach in Ranking of Banks according to Financial Performances," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-11, June.
    2. Shapiro, Arnold F., 2013. "Modeling future lifetime as a fuzzy random variable," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 864-870.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    4. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    5. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    6. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    7. Shapiro, Arnold F., 2004. "Fuzzy logic in insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 399-424, October.
    8. Berry-Stölzle, Thomas R. & Koissi, Marie-Claire & Shapiro, Arnold F., 2010. "Detecting fuzzy relationships in regression models: The case of insurer solvency surveillance in Germany," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 554-567, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    3. Luukka, Pasi & Collan, Mikael, 2015. "New fuzzy insurance pricing method for giga-investment project insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 22-29.
    4. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    5. de Andrés-Sánchez, Jorge & González-Vila Puchades, Laura, 2017. "The valuation of life contingencies: A symmetrical triangular fuzzy approximation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 83-94.
    6. Germán Álvarez-López & Alejandra María Múnera & Juan G. Villegas, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Tools for the Selection of Biomasses as Supplementary Cementitious Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "Measuring the Environmental Maturity of the Supply Chain Finance: A Big Data-Based Multi-Criteria Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, April.
    8. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Fuzzy Multicriteria Models for Decision Making in Gamification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Sadefo Kamdem, J. & Mbairadjim Moussa, A. & Terraza, M., 2012. "Fuzzy risk adjusted performance measures: Application to hedge funds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 702-712.
    10. Jana Krejčí & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1119-1145, July.
    11. Chin-Yi Chen & Jih-Jeng Huang, 2019. "Deriving Fuzzy Weights of the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process via Fuzzy Inverse Matrix," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Ilić, Damir & Milošević, Isidora & Ilić-Kosanović, Tatjana, 2022. "Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for smart city transformation: Case study Belgrade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Shapiro, Arnold F. & Koissi, Marie-Claire, 2017. "Fuzzy logic modifications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-202.
    14. Rachida Hennani & Michel Terraza, 2012. "Value-at-Risk stressée chaotique d’un portefeuille bancaire," Working Papers 12-23, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Sep 2012.
    15. Yao, Kai & Qin, Zhongfeng, 2015. "A modified insurance risk process with uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 227-233.
    16. Esther Jose & Puneet Agarwal & Jun Zhuang & Jose Swaminathan, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1133-1168, June.
    17. Liu, Qizhi, 2022. "Identifying and correcting the defects of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process: A comparative study of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process and the Markov chain-based analytic network ," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    18. T. Sivageerthi & Bathrinath Sankaranarayanan & Syed Mithun Ali & Koppiahraj Karuppiah, 2022. "Modelling the Relationships among the Key Factors Affecting the Performance of Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plants: Implications for Achieving Clean Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Viet Anh Ta & Chieh-Yu Lin, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Digital Transformation Adoption for SMEs in an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Pablo J. Villacorta & Laura González-Vila Puchades & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2021. "Fuzzy Markovian Bonus-Malus Systems in Non-Life Insurance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:18:p:3268-:d:910245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.