IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7467-d411826.html

Diminishing Farm Diversity of East African Highland Bananas in Banana Bunchy Top Disease Outbreak Areas of Burundi—The Effect of Both Disease and Control Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Simbare

    (Bioversity International, Banana Genetic Resources and Management, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1893, Burundi
    Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar P.O. Box 5005, Senegal)

  • Cheikh Amet Bassirou Sane

    (Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar P.O. Box 5005, Senegal)

  • Innocent Nduwimana

    (Bioversity International, Banana Genetic Resources and Management, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1893, Burundi)

  • Celestin Niyongere

    (Crop Production Department, Institute of Agronomic Sciences of Burundi (ISABU), Bujumbura P.O. Box 795, Burundi)

  • Bonaventure Aman Omondi

    (Bioversity International, Banana Genetic Resources and Management, Bujumbura P.O. Box 1893, Burundi)

Abstract

Disease-driven selection favours evasive, tolerant, and resistant cultivars, changing cultivar diversity significantly. Since its outbreak in Burundi in the late 1980s, Banana Bunchy Top Disease (BBTD) has now spread to 5 out of 18 provinces across the country, principally through informal seed exchanges. Control approaches have focused on using tissue culture clean planting material and eradicating infected mats. This study investigated the impact of BBTD and its control measures on seed selection practices and banana cultivars diversity in Burundi, by comparing two BBTD endemic sites and one where the disease wasn’t reported. Results have shown that in addition to agronomic traits used in all sites, some BBTD-typical symptoms were used in seed selection in the endemic areas. Own seed provisioning and formal seed sources networks were more likely to be observed in BBTD-endemic areas, compared with the non-endemic area. Disease control using certified tissue culture planting materials reduced the varietal diversity of local cultivars but enabled the introduction of new cultivars. A general reduction in the diversity of local cultivars grown by farmers in the BBTD endemic zones was observed, with about half of the diversity per farmer compared to the non-endemic zone. Farmer demand for varieties (local and improved) was not different between the two areas. Sustainable conservation of crop genetic diversity in the presence of disease invasions remains a problem to be addressed. Thus, implementing seed system-linked intervention with an explicit and monitored diversity conservation objective would increase the sustainability of agricultural production in such situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Simbare & Cheikh Amet Bassirou Sane & Innocent Nduwimana & Celestin Niyongere & Bonaventure Aman Omondi, 2020. "Diminishing Farm Diversity of East African Highland Bananas in Banana Bunchy Top Disease Outbreak Areas of Burundi—The Effect of Both Disease and Control Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7467-:d:411826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Ocimati & Jeroen J. C. Groot & Pablo Tittonell & Godfrey Taulya & Jules Ntamwira & Serge Amato & Guy Blomme, 2020. "Xanthomonas Wilt of Banana Drives Changes in Land-Use and Ecosystem Services Across Infected Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Kreuter, Frauke & Beddo, Vanessa, 2004. "A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using Stata," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 11(b03).
    3. Anoush Ficiciyan & Jacqueline Loos & Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach & Teja Tscharntke, 2018. "More than Yield: Ecosystem Services of Traditional versus Modern Crop Varieties Revisited," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Massey, Oliver T., 2011. "A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 21-28, February.
    5. Beddo, Vanessa & Kreuter, Frauke, 2004. "A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using SPSS," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 11(b02).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Jukka Heinonen & Seppo Junnila, 2014. "The Power of Urban Planning on Environmental Sustainability: A Focus Group Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Azucena Gracia & Ana María Sánchez & Francesc Jurado & Cristina Mallor, 2020. "Making Use of Sustainable Local Plant Genetic Resources: Would Consumers Support the Recovery of a Traditional Purple Carrot?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Strzelecki, Artur & Wolny, Robert & Jaciow, Magdalena & Klimontowicz, Monika & Austen, Agata, 2025. "Residents' needs and perspectives on the European City of science: A study of Katowice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Mike Burbridge & Gregory M. Morrison, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Price Amanya Muleke & Yueqing Ji & Yongyi Fu & Shadrack Kipkogei, 2025. "Weather Index Insurance and Input Intensification: Evidence from Smallholder Farmers in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Aslam, Usman & Davis, Leon, 2024. "Analyzing consumer expectations and experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) apps in the fashion retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Labeyrie, Vanesse & Friedman, Rachel S. & Donnet, Sophie & Faye, Ndeye Fatou & Cobelli, Océane & Baggio, Jacopo & Felipe-Lucia, María R. & Raimond, Christine, 2023. "Linking seed networks and crop diversity contributions to people: A case study in small-scale farming systems in Sahelian Senegal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Lea Kliem, 2024. "Strengthening agroecological resilience through commons-based seed governance in the Philippines," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5367-5399, February.
    9. Manuela Teixeira & Eduardo Feijão & Luís Catarino & Ana Rita Matos & Andreia Figueiredo & Jorge Marques da Silva, 2021. "Exploring Local Maize Diversity for Increased Agricultural Sustainability: New Insights into Drought Stress Response and Recovery of Guinea-Bissau Landraces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Aurora Kagawa-Viviani & Penny Levin & Edward Johnston & Jeri Ooka & Jonathan Baker & Michael Kantar & Noa Kekuewa Lincoln, 2018. "I Ke Ēwe ʻĀina o Ke Kupuna: Hawaiian Ancestral Crops in Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-36, December.
    11. Burke, John & Fitzhenry, Mark & Houghton, Sharon & Fortune, Donal G., 2021. "Breaking the cycle of intergenerational trauma: Evaluating the impact of parental adverse childhood experiences on parenting group outcomes using a mixed-methods approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Lauterbach, Josephine & Risius, Antje & Bantle, Christina, "undated". "Communicating the Benefits of Agrobiodiversity Enhancing Products - Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305625, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    13. Maria Michali & George Eleftherakis, 2022. "Public Engagement Practices in EC-Funded RRI Projects: Fostering Socio-Scientific Collaborations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Anshuman Singh & Ranjay K. Singh & Neeraj Kumar & Suresh Kumar & Parvender Sheoran & Dheeraj Singh & Satyendra Kumar & P. C. Sharma, 2022. "Adapting to Social–Ecological Risks to the Conservation of a Muskmelon Landrace in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Pia Korba & Elina Kalliala & Aino-Kaisa Nuotio, 2018. "GHG Emissions Reduction through Urban Planners’ Improved Control over Earthworks: A Case Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Eleni PAPADOPOULOU & Christos PAPALEXIOU & Nikolaos HASANAGAS, 2012. "Participatory Evaluation Of Rural Development Programmes: A Qualitative Approach In The Case Of Modernisation Of Agricultural Holdings In Greece," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 81-94, June.
    17. Jayasree Krishnankutty & Michael Blakeney & Rajesh K. Raju & Kadambot H. M. Siddique, 2021. "Sustainability of Traditional Rice Cultivation in Kerala, India—A Socio-Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Giuseppe Di Vita & Daniela Spina & Rachele De Cianni & Roberto Carbone & Mario D’Amico & Raffaele Zanchini, 2023. "Enhancing the extended value chain of the aromatic plant sector in Italy: a multiple correspondence analysis based on stakeholders’ opinions," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Sarah Marie Müller & Jasmin Peisker & Claudia Bieling & Kathrin Linnemann & Konrad Reidl & Klaus Schmieder, 2019. "The Importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity for Landscape Visitors in the Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb (Germany)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Yusuph, Amri S. & Nzunda, Emmanuel F. & Mourice, Sixbert K & Dalgaard, Tommy, 2024. "Synergies and Trade-Offs of Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices and Mediating Factors in Enhancing Maize Yields among Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania's Semi-Arid Regions," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 42(12), pages 1-22.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7467-:d:411826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.