IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v47y2014icp71-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy advocacy and leadership training for formerly incarcerated women: An empowerment evaluation of ReConnect, a program of the Women in Prison Project, Correctional Association of New York

Author

Listed:
  • Pinto, R.M.
  • Rahman, R.
  • Williams, A.

Abstract

There is limited knowledge on re-entry initiatives for formerly incarcerated women specifically on building women's advocacy and leadership skills. Our research highlights an empowerment evaluation on ReConnect, a 12-session; innovative advocacy and leadership development program rooted in an integrated framework of empowerment, and transformational leadership theories. Using thematic analysis, we coded three focus groups with 24 graduates, for themes that matched our framework's concepts. ReConnect graduates reported being empowered by the information they received on parental rights, housing, and employment. Participants agreed that ReConnect improved their communication skills, preparing them to advocate for themselves and community members.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinto, R.M. & Rahman, R. & Williams, A., 2014. "Policy advocacy and leadership training for formerly incarcerated women: An empowerment evaluation of ReConnect, a program of the Women in Prison Project, Correctional Association of New York," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 71-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:47:y:2014:i:c:p:71-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massey, Oliver T., 2011. "A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 21-28, February.
    2. Myers, J. & Zack, B. & Kramer, K. & Gardner, M. & Rucobo, G. & Costa-Taylor, S., 2005. "Get connected: An HIV prevention case management program for men and women leaving California prisons," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(10), pages 1682-1684.
    3. Israel, B.A. & Coombe, C.M. & Cheezum, R.R. & Schulz, A.J. & McGranaghan, R.J. & Lichtenstein, R. & Reyes, A.G. & Clement, J. & Burris, A., 2010. "Community-based participatory research: A capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(11), pages 2094-2102.
    4. Cashman, S.B. & Adeky, S. & Allen III, A.J. & Corburn, J. & Israel, B.A. & Montaño, J. & Rafelito, A. & Rhodes, S.D. & Swanston, S. & Wallerstein, N. & Eng, E., 2008. "The power and the promise: Working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(8), pages 1407-1417.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Petteway & Mahasin Mujahid & Amani Allen & Rachel Morello-Frosch, 2019. "Towards a People’s Social Epidemiology: Envisioning a More Inclusive and Equitable Future for Social Epi Research and Practice in the 21st Century," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Chengquan Li & Can Zhang, 2024. "Transformative Perspectives in Physical Education Evaluation: Empowering Diverse Stakeholders for Holistic Learning Experiences in the Era of Big Data," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13334-13360, September.
    3. Barbara L. Allen & Johanna Lees & Alison K. Cohen & Maxime Jeanjean, 2019. "Collaborative Workshops for Community Meaning-Making and Data Analyses: How Focus Groups Strengthen Data by Enhancing Understanding and Promoting Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Lisa M. Vaughn & MaryAnn Lohmueller, 2014. "Calling All Stakeholders," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 336-355, August.
    5. Brubacher, Laura Jane & Dewey, Cate E. & Cunsolo, Ashlee & Humphries, Sally & Healey Akearok, Gwen K. & Gong, Crystal & Harper, Sherilee L., 2020. "Mapping the maternal health research landscape in Nunavut: A systematic search & critical review of methodology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Sophie Staniszewska & Kirstie Haywood & Jo Brett & Liz Tutton, 2012. "Patient and Public Involvement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 5(2), pages 79-87, June.
    7. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Jukka Heinonen & Seppo Junnila, 2014. "The Power of Urban Planning on Environmental Sustainability: A Focus Group Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Constantine E. Kontokosta, 2016. "The Quantified Community and Neighborhood Labs: A Framework for Computational Urban Science and Civic Technology Innovation," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 67-84, October.
    9. Strzelecki, Artur & Wolny, Robert & Jaciow, Magdalena & Klimontowicz, Monika & Austen, Agata, 2025. "Residents' needs and perspectives on the European City of science: A study of Katowice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Mike Burbridge & Gregory M. Morrison, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Aslam, Usman & Davis, Leon, 2024. "Analyzing consumer expectations and experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) apps in the fashion retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Lily F. Roberts & Olivia Lounsbury & Veronica Awuzudike & Neil Jennings & Emma L. Lawrance, 2022. "Healthy Environments: Understanding Perceptions of Underrepresented Communities in the United Kingdom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Judith Langfermann, 2024. "How Citizen Entrepreneurship Works," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 10(2), pages 327-334, July.
    14. Garett Sansom & Philip Berke & Thomas McDonald & Eva Shipp & Jennifer Horney, 2016. "Confirming the Environmental Concerns of Community Members Utilizing Participatory-Based Research in the Houston Neighborhood of Manchester," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Wagemakers, Annemarie & Vaandrager, Lenneke & Koelen, Maria A. & Saan, Hans & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 428-435, November.
    16. Erdem, Seda & Campbell, Danny & Thompson, Carl, 2014. "Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: Prioritising health service innovations," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 10-22.
    17. Jae M. Sevelius & Orlando O. Harris & Lisa Bowleg, 2024. "Intersectional Mentorship in Academic Medicine: A Conceptual Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Burke, John & Fitzhenry, Mark & Houghton, Sharon & Fortune, Donal G., 2021. "Breaking the cycle of intergenerational trauma: Evaluating the impact of parental adverse childhood experiences on parenting group outcomes using a mixed-methods approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Prasanthi Puvanachandra & Anthony Mugeere & Charles Ssemugabo & Olive Kobusingye & Margaret Peden, 2024. "Voices from the Ground: Community Perspectives on Preventing Unintentional Child Injuries in Low-Income Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Marj Plumb & Senaida Fernandez Poole & Heather Sarantis & Susan Braun & Janna Cordeiro & Juliana Van Olphen & Marion Kavanaugh-Lynch, 2019. "Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:47:y:2014:i:c:p:71-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.