IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6983-d404898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model

Author

Listed:
  • Snežana Tadić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Mladen Krstić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Violeta Roso

    (Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Nikolina Brnjac

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Globalization and decentralization of production generate the intensive growth of goods and transport flows, mostly performed by the maritime transport. Ports, as the main nodes in the global logistics networks, are becoming congested, space for their expansion limited, and traffic in their hinterland congested. As a solution to these and many other hinterland-transport-related problems stands out the development of dry port (DP) terminals. Selection of their location is one of the most important strategic decisions on which depends their competitiveness in the market and the functionality of the logistics network. Accordingly, the evaluation and selection of locations for the development of the DP in accordance with the requirements of various stakeholders is performed in this paper, as a prerequisite for the establishment of an ecological, economic, and socially sustainable logistics network in the observed area. To solve this problem, a new hybrid model of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) that combines Delphi, AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), and CODAS (Combinative Distance-based Assessment) methods in a grey environment is developed. The main contributions of this paper are the defined model, the problem-solving approach based on finding a compromise solution, simultaneous consideration of the environmental, economic, and social sustainability of the DP concept and its implementation in the regional international markets. The applicability of the approach and the defined MCDM model is demonstrated by solving a real-life case study of ranking the potential DP locations in the Western Balkans region. Based on the obtained results, it is concluded that in the current market conditions, it would be most realistic to open three DP terminals, in Zagreb, Ljubljana, and Belgrade.

Suggested Citation

  • Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6983-:d:404898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osman Taylan & Rami Alamoudi & Mohammad Kabli & Alawi AlJifri & Fares Ramzi & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Assessment of Energy Systems Using Extended Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS Approaches to Manage Non-Cooperative Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lu Aye & Colin F. Duffield, 2019. "Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    4. Van Nguyen, Truong & Zhang, Jie & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & He, Yong, 2020. "A data-driven optimization of large-scale dry port location using the hybrid approach of data mining and complex network theory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Shivani Guru & D. K. Mahalik, 2019. "A comparative study on performance measurement of Indian public sector banks using AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-grey relational analysis," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(4), pages 1213-1239, December.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2019. "Planning an Intermodal Terminal for the Sustainable Transport Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    8. Yakup Çelikbilek, 2018. "Using an Integrated Grey AHP-MOORA Approach for Personnel Selection: An Application on Manager Selection in the Health Industry," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 6(1), pages 69-82, March.
    9. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid, 2018. "Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 462-471.
    10. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Outcome-Driven Supply Chain Perspective on Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Ercan Kurtulus & Ismail Bilge Cetin, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Dry Port Usage: A Case of Inland Container Transport in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Puthearath Chan & Myeong-Hun Lee, 2019. "Developing Sustainable City Indicators for Cambodia through Delphi Processes of Panel Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    13. Albert Veenstra & Rob Zuidwijk & Eelco van Asperen, 2012. "The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(1), pages 14-32, March.
    14. Tao, Xuezong & Wu, Qin & Zhu, Lichao, 2017. "Mitigation potential of CO2 emissions from modal shift induced by subsidy in hinterland container transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 265-273.
    15. Facchini, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mossa, G., 2020. "Optimal dry port configuration for container terminals: A non-linear model for sustainable decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-178.
    16. Mehdi KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Zenonas TURSKIS & Jurgita ANTUCHEVICIENE, 2016. "A New Combinative Distance-Based Assessment(Codas) Method For Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(3), pages 25-44.
    17. Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer, 1963. "An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 458-467, April.
    18. Mansour Rahimi & Ardavan Asef-Vaziri & Robert Harrison, 2008. "An Inland Port Location-Allocation Model for a Regional Intermodal Goods Movement System," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(4), pages 362-379, December.
    19. Chuanxu Wang & Qian Chen & Rongbing Huang, 2018. "Locating dry ports on a network: a case study on Tianjin Port," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 71-88, January.
    20. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    21. Monios, Jason, 2011. "The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-66.
    22. Stefan Hajkowicz & Geoff McDonald & Phil Smith, 2000. "An Evaluation of Multiple Objective Decision Support Weighting Techniques in Natural Resource Management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 505-518.
    23. Lättilä, Lauri & Henttu, Ville & Hilmola, Olli-Pekka, 2013. "Hinterland operations of sea ports do matter: Dry port usage effects on transportation costs and CO2 emissions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 23-42.
    24. A Beresford & S Pettit & Q Xu & S Williams, 2012. "A study of dry port development in China," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(1), pages 73-98, March.
    25. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    26. Weidong Li & Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Yulia Panova, 2019. "Container Sea Ports and Dry Ports: Future CO 2 Emission Reduction Potential in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    27. Ciortescu Cezar-Gabriel, 2010. "Performance Assessment In Operating Dry Ports," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 934-938, December.
    28. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    29. Tadić, Snežana & Krstić, Mladen & Brnjac, Nikolina, 2019. "Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 170-180.
    30. Zheng Chang & Theo Notteboom & Jing Lu, 2015. "A two-phase model for dry port location with an application to the port of Dalian in China," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 442-464, June.
    31. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.
    32. Xuejun Feng & Yan Zhang & Yuwei Li & Wei Wang, 2013. "A Location-Allocation Model for Seaport-Dry Port System Optimization," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, November.
    33. Henttu, Ville & Hilmola, Olli-Pekka, 2011. "Financial and environmental impacts of hypothetical Finnish dry port structure," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 35-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yakup Çelikbilek & Sarbast Moslem, 2023. "A grey multi criteria decision making application for analyzing the essential reasons of recurrent lane change," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 916-941, June.
    2. Réka Szpotowicz (née Nádasi) & Csaba Tóth, 2020. "Revision of Sustainable Road Rating Systems: Selection of the Best Suited System for Hungarian Road Construction Using TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Huifang Li & Yin Wang, 2023. "Hierarchical Multimodal Hub Location Problem with Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Nguyen Van Thanh & Nguyen Thi Kim Lan, 2022. "Solar Energy Deployment for the Sustainable Future of Vietnam: Hybrid SWOC-FAHP-WASPAS Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Jui-Fang Chang & Chao-Jung Lai & Chia-Nan Wang & Ming-Hsien Hsueh & Van Thanh Nguyen, 2021. "Fuzzy Optimization Model for Decision-Making in Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Chakat Chueadee & Preecha Kriengkorakot & Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, 2022. "MDEALNS for Solving the Tapioca Starch Logistics Network Problem for the Land Port of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Elzbieta Broniewicz & Karolina Ogrodnik, 2021. "A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Mladen Krstić & Snežana Tadić & Valerio Elia & Stefania Massari & Muhammad Umar Farooq, 2023. "Intermodal Terminal Subsystem Technology Selection Using Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Shinya Hanaoka & Takuma Matsuda & Wataru Saito & Tomoya Kawasaki & Takashi Hiraide, 2021. "Identifying Factors for Selecting Land over Maritime in Inter-Regional Cross-Border Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Almeida Rodrigues, Thiago & Maria de Miranda Mota, Caroline & Manuele dos Santos, Inez, 2021. "Determining dry port criteria that support decision making," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    3. Ercan Kurtulus & Ismail Bilge Cetin, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Dry Port Usage: A Case of Inland Container Transport in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Outcome-Driven Supply Chain Perspective on Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Chakat Chueadee & Preecha Kriengkorakot & Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, 2022. "MDEALNS for Solving the Tapioca Starch Logistics Network Problem for the Land Port of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Wan, Shulin & Luan, Weixin & Chen, Yuying & Lin, Qiaoqiao, 2022. "Influence of dry ports construction on seaport growth: Case of Ningbo Zhoushan Port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-47.
    10. Egor PLOTNIKOV & Aleksandr RAKHMANGULOV, 2021. "Modeling China'S Dry Port Cooperation In Supply Chains," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(3), pages 89-103, September.
    11. Yiran Sun & Yuqian Wang & Jingci Xie, 2022. "The co-evolution of seaports and dry ports in Shandong province in China under the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.
    13. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.
    14. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    15. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    16. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    17. Van Nguyen, Truong & Zhang, Jie & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & He, Yong, 2020. "A data-driven optimization of large-scale dry port location using the hybrid approach of data mining and complex network theory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Behzad Behdani & Bart Wiegmans & Violeta Roso & Hercules Haralambides, 2020. "Port-hinterland transport and logistics: emerging trends and frontier research," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lu Aye & Colin F. Duffield, 2019. "Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    20. Qiu, Xuan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2019. "Quantity discount pricing for rail transport in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 563-580.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6983-:d:404898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.