IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p5061-d374559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Smartphone-Based Healthcare Systems: A Systems Engineering Approach to Assess the Efficacy of Respiratory Monitoring Apps

Author

Listed:
  • Misagh Faezipour

    (Department of Engineering Technology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Miad Faezipour

    (Departments of Computer Science & Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT 06604, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Recent technological developments along with advances in smart healthcare have been rapidly changing the healthcare industry and improving outcomes for patients. To ensure reliable smartphone-based healthcare interfaces with high levels of efficacy, a system dynamics model with sustainability indicators is proposed. The focus of this paper is smartphone-based breathing monitoring systems that could possibly use breathing sounds as the data acquisition input. This can especially be useful for the self-testing procedure of the ongoing global COVID-19 crisis in which the lungs are attacked and breathing is affected. The method of investigation is based on a systems engineering approach using system dynamics modeling. In this paper, first, a causal model for a smartphone-based respiratory function monitoring is introduced. Then, a systems thinking approach is applied to propose a system dynamics model of the smartphone-based respiratory function monitoring system. The system dynamics model investigates the level of efficacy and sustainability of the system by studying the behavior of various factors of the system including patient wellbeing and care, cost, convenience, user friendliness, in addition to other embedded software and hardware breathing monitoring system design and performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, real-time response, etc.). The sustainability level is also studied through introducing various indicators that directly relate to the three pillars of sustainability. Various scenarios have been applied and tested on the proposed model. The results depict the dynamics of the model for the efficacy and sustainability of smartphone-based breathing monitoring systems. The proposed ideas provide a clear insight to envision sustainable and effective smartphone-based healthcare monitoring systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Misagh Faezipour & Miad Faezipour, 2020. "Sustainable Smartphone-Based Healthcare Systems: A Systems Engineering Approach to Assess the Efficacy of Respiratory Monitoring Apps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5061-:d:374559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascoe, Gregory C., 1983. "Patient satisfaction in primary health care: A literature review and analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 185-210, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alla Mostepaniuk & Turgay Akalin & Mohammad Reza Parish, 2023. "Practices Pursuing the Sustainability of A Healthcare Organization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Saba Pourreza & Misagh Faezipour & Miad Faezipour, 2022. "Eye-SCOR: A Supply Chain Operations Reference-Based Framework for Smart Eye Status Monitoring Using System Dynamics Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Rosabel Roig-Vila & Paz Prendes-Espinosa & Mayra Urrea-Solano, 2020. "Problematic Smartphone Use in Spanish and Italian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Misagh Faezipour & Miad Faezipour & Saba Pourreza, 2023. "Resiliency and Risk Assessment of Smart Vision-Based Skin Screening Applications with Dynamics Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanacore, Amalia & Pellegrino, Maria Sole, 2021. "Testing inter-group ranking heterogeneity: do patient characteristics matter for prioritization of quality improvements in healthcare service?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Grytten, Jostein & Carlsen, Fredrik & Skau, Irene, 2009. "Services production and patient satisfaction in primary care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 312-321, March.
    3. Prof. Dr. Klaus Bendel & Prof. Dr. Wenzel Matiaske & Prof. Dr. Florian Schramm, 2000. "'Kundenzufriedenheit' bei ambulanten Pflegedienstleistern. Bestandsaufnahme und Vorschläge für ein stresstheoretisch fundiertes Messinstrument," Report 003, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.
    4. Diana Rofail & Fiona Taylor & Antoine Regnault & Anna Filonenko, 2011. "Treatment Satisfaction Instruments for Different Purposes during a Product’s Lifecycle," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 4(4), pages 227-240, December.
    5. Bjørknes, Ragnhild & Ortiz-Barreda, Gaby, 2021. "Are the voices of parents heard? A scoping review of satisfaction in parenting programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Alicia Ramírez-Orellana, 2019. "Patient Satisfaction in the Spanish National Health Service: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Margaritis, Eleftherios & Katharaki, Maria & Katharakis, George, 2012. "Exceeding parents’ expectations in Ear–Nose–Throat outpatient facilities: The development and analysis of a questionnaire," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 246-255.
    8. Smaranda Adina Cosma & Marius Bota & Cristina Fleșeriu & Claudiu Morgovan & Mădălina Văleanu & Dan Cosma, 2020. "Measuring Patients’ Perception and Satisfaction with the Romanian Healthcare System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Andreas C. Soteriou & Richard B. Chase, 2000. "A Robust Optimization Approach for Improving Service Quality," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 264-286, May.
    10. Mummalaneni, Venkatapparao & Gopalakrishna, Pradeep, 1997. "Access, resource, and cost impacts on consumer satisfaction with health care: A comparison across alternative health care modes and time," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 173-186, July.
    11. Xesfingi, Sofia & Karamanis, Dimitrios, 2015. "In- and Out-patient satisfaction assessment: the case of a greek General Hospital," MPRA Paper 66672, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Pflueger, Dane, 2016. "Knowing patients: The customer survey and the changing margins of accounting in healthcare," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-33.
    13. Thuy Nguyen & Huong Nguyen & Anh Dang, 2020. "Determinants of patient satisfaction: Lessons from large-scale inpatient interviews in Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Jaapar, Mustaffa & Musa, Ghazali & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh & Saub, Roslan, 2017. "Dental tourism: Examining tourist profiles, motivation and satisfaction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 538-552.
    15. Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Thomas Blaschke & Stefan Kienberger, 2017. "Explaining Accessibility and Satisfaction Related to Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 719-739, September.
    16. Weinhold, Ines & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "Rural - urban differences in determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 76-85.
    17. Zi Yang Wang & Jie Song & Xing Lin Feng, 2023. "A prediction model of patient satisfaction: policy evaluation and sensitivity analysis," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 455-486, June.
    18. Winfried Zinn & Sebastian Sauer & Richard Göllner, 2016. "The German Inpatient Satisfaction Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    19. Gross, Revital, 2004. "A consumer-based tool for evaluating the quality of health services in the Israeli health care system following reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 143-158, May.
    20. Nik Aida Nik Adib & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Azriani Ab Rahman & Raishan Shafini Bakar & Nor Azni Yahaya & Suria Hussin & Wan Nor Arifin, 2018. "Translation and Validation of the Malay Version of the Parents’ Satisfaction Scale (PSS-M) for Assessment of Caregivers’ Satisfaction with Health Care Services for Children with Autism Spectrum Disord," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5061-:d:374559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.