IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4065-d358741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic Fire Risk Framework for Optimizing Construction Site Layout

Author

Listed:
  • Rani El Meouche

    (Institut de Recherche en Constructibilité, ESTP-Paris, Université Paris-Est, F-94230 Cachan, France)

  • Mohammed Abunemeh

    (Civil Engineering Department, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box: 7, West Bank, Palestine)

  • Ihab Hijazi

    (Urban Planning Engineering Department, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box: 7, West Bank, Palestine)

  • Ahmed Mebarki

    (Laboratoire Modélisation et Simulation Multi Echelle (MSME/UMR 8208 CNRS), Université Paris-Est, 5 Blvd. Descartes, 77454 Marne-La-Vallée, France)

  • Fadi Fatayer

    (Building Engineering Department, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box: 7, West Bank, Palestine)

  • Amjad Issa

    (Civil Engineering Department, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box: 7, West Bank, Palestine)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to develop an efficient model able to reduce catastrophic consequences and the significant number of victims resulting from fires at construction sites. The paper proposes probabilistic modeling aimed to minimize the probability of failure of a construction site. Methodology: The developed model in this paper consists of modeling fire hazards, the vulnerability of the potential targets, and the risk within construction sites. The optimization algorithm called “differential evolution” is used in order to determine the optimal site layout, which is characterized by having the smallest overall probability of failure. A numerical simulation is performed to delineate an appropriate probability density function of the failure of the site. In addition, a geographic information system (GIS) is used to display the spatial variability of fire risk on a construction site. Findings: The paper provides an efficient model to enhance site layout planning and assign locations for supporting temporary facilities at appropriate positions within a construction site. The model is examined through applying it on a simple case study containing numerous facilities. All these facilities are considered vulnerable targets and some of them are potential fire hazards, with different intensity values. Value: Most of the previous research focuses on travel cost distance in developing site layout planning models. This paper fulfills the development of a valuable model able to generate an optimized construction site layout by minimizing the probability of failure of the whole site. It will assist the decision makers and the risk managers in identifying the riskiest zones on a construction site.

Suggested Citation

  • Rani El Meouche & Mohammed Abunemeh & Ihab Hijazi & Ahmed Mebarki & Fadi Fatayer & Amjad Issa, 2020. "Probabilistic Fire Risk Framework for Optimizing Construction Site Layout," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4065-:d:358741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4065/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4065/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heragu, Sunderesh S. & Kusiak, Andrew, 1991. "Efficient models for the facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Kusiak, Andrew & Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1987. "The facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 229-251, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    2. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Bazargan-Lari, Massoud, 1999. "Layout designs in cellular manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 258-272, January.
    4. Kim, J. -Y. & Kim, Y. -D., 1995. "Graph theoretic heuristics for unequal-sized facility layout problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 391-401, August.
    5. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    6. Ignacio Castillo & Thaddeus Sim, 2004. "A spring-embedding approach for the facility layout problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 73-81, January.
    7. Junqi Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Feng Chen & Silu Liu & Lixia Zhu, 2022. "A novel hybrid immune clonal selection algorithm for the constrained corridor allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 953-972, April.
    8. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C. & Lin, Ting-li, 1995. "A heuristic procedure for the single-row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-73, November.
    9. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Song, Xiang & Jones, Dylan & Akbari, Negar, 2017. "Layout optimisation for an installation port of an offshore wind farm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 67-83.
    10. Lin, Jin-Ling & Foote, Bobbie & Pulat, Simin & Chang, Chir-Ho & Cheung, John Y., 1996. "Solving the failure-to-fit problem for plant layout: By changing department shapes and sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 135-146, February.
    11. Ioannou, George, 2006. "Time-phased creation of hybrid manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 183-198, August.
    12. A. R. S. Amaral, 2022. "A heuristic approach for the double row layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1-36, September.
    13. Hungerländer, Philipp & Anjos, Miguel F., 2015. "A semidefinite optimization-based approach for global optimization of multi-row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 46-61.
    14. Kim, Kap Hwan & Moon, Kyung Chan, 2003. "Berth scheduling by simulated annealing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 541-560, July.
    15. Uma Kothari & Diptesh Ghosh, 2012. "A Competitive Genetic Algorithm for Single Row Facility Layout," Working Papers id:4915, eSocialSciences.
    16. Kazuhiro Tsuchiya & Sunil Bharitkar & Yoshiyasu Takefuji, 1996. "A neural network approach to facility layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 556-563, March.
    17. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2016. "A concept of a flexible approach to the facilities layout problems in logistics systems," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/11, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    18. Gomez, A. & Fernandez, Q. I. & De la Fuente Garcia, D. & Garcia, P. J., 2003. "Using genetic algorithms to resolve layout problems in facilities where there are aisles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 271-282, June.
    19. Kothari, Ravi & Ghosh, Diptesh, 2013. "Tabu search for the single row facility layout problem using exhaustive 2-opt and insertion neighborhoods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 93-100.
    20. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2016. "Experimental examination of facilities layout problems in logistics systems including objects with diverse sizes and shapes," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/12, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4065-:d:358741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.