IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2271-d223038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double-Edged Effects of Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Employee Task Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating by Role Ambiguity and Moderating by Prosocial Motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Danping Shao

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Erhua Zhou

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Peiran Gao

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Lirong Long

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jie Xiong

    (Rennes School of Business, 2 rue Robert d’Arbrissel CS 76522, 35065 Rennes CEDEX, France)

Abstract

Previous literature has explored the positive effects of socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) on employees, leaving potential dark sides largely ignored. By integrating situational-strength theory and motivation literature, this study investigates the double-edged effects of SRHRM on employee performance. Based on a sample of 314 employee–supervisor dyads from three companies, we found that SRHRM could increase employees’ organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) while decreasing their task performance through role-ambiguity mediation. Interestingly, prosocial motivation serves as a significant moderator in strengthening the positive relationship between SRHRM and OCB and the negative association between SRHRM and task performance. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of how managers should conduct SRHRM practices among employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Danping Shao & Erhua Zhou & Peiran Gao & Lirong Long & Jie Xiong, 2019. "Double-Edged Effects of Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Employee Task Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating by Role Ambiguity and Moderating by Prosocial Mot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2271-:d:223038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui, Chun & Law, Kenneth S. & Chen, Zhen Xiong, 1999. "A Structural Equation Model of the Effects of Negative Affectivity, Leader-Member Exchange, and Perceived Job Mobility on In-role and Extra-role Performance: A Chinese Case," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 3-21, January.
    2. Merrell, Joy, 2000. "Ambiguity: exploring the complexity of roles and boundaries when working with volunteers in well woman clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 93-102, July.
    3. Kaifeng Jiang & Riki Takeuchi & David P. Lepak, 2013. "Where do We Go From Here? New Perspectives on the Black Box in Strategic Human Resource Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1448-1480, December.
    4. Chuanmin Mi & FangKai Chang & ChingTorng Lin & YuHsuan Chang, 2018. "The Theory of Reasoned Action to CSR Behavioral Intentions: The Role of CSR Expected Benefit, CSR Expected Effort and Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Kun Li & Nasrin R. Khalili & Weiquan Cheng, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in China: Trends, Context, and Impact on Company Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Subhash C. Kundu & Neha Gahlawat, 2016. "Effects of socially responsible HR practices on employees' work attitudes," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3/4), pages 140-160.
    7. Grant, Adam M., 2009. "Putting Self-Interest Out of Business? Contributions and Unanswered Questions From Use-Inspired Research on Prosocial Motivation," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 94-98, March.
    8. Duygu Turker, 2018. "Managing Social Responsibility," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer, number 978-3-319-91710-8, May.
    9. Andreas Klein & Helfried Moosbrugger, 2000. "Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 457-474, December.
    10. Yufang Huang & Di Fan & Yiyi Su & Fei Wu, 2018. "High-performance work systems, dual stressors and ‘new generation’ employee in China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 490-509, August.
    11. Lu Zhang & Xiaochao Guo & Zhimei Lei & Ming K. Lim, 2019. "Social Network Analysis of Sustainable Human Resource Management from the Employee Training’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Mats Ehrnrooth & Ingmar Björkman, 2012. "An Integrative HRM Process Theorization: Beyond Signalling Effects and Mutual Gains," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(6), pages 1109-1135, September.
    13. Duygu Turker, 2018. "Global Challenges: Aligning Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development Goals," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Managing Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 161-176, Springer.
    14. Smith, Wendy K. & Gonin, Michael & Besharov, Marya L., 2013. "Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 407-442, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María del Mar Ramos-González & Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2022. "Effects of socially responsible human resource management (SR-HRM) on innovation and reputation in entrepreneurial SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1205-1233, September.
    2. Milota Vetráková & Ivana Šimočková & Kristína Pompurová, 2019. "Age and Educational Diversification of Hotel Employees and Its Impact on Turnover," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Mónica Santana & Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Susana Pasamar, 2020. "Mapping the Link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Human Resource Management (HRM): How Is This Relationship Measured?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Afshin Omidi & Cinzia Dal Zotto, 2022. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Eun-Jung Woo & Eungoo Kang, 2021. "Employee Environmental Capability and Its Relationship with Corporate Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Zhongju Liao & Jialin Cheng & Qian Chen, 2022. "Socially responsible human resource management and employee ethical voice: Roles of employee ethical self‐efficacy and organizational identification," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 820-829, July.
    7. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Jonghun Sun & Young Woo Sohn, 2021. "The Influence of Dual Missions on Employees’ Meaning of Work and Turnover Intention in Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Arelys López‐Concepción & Ana I. Gil‐Lacruz & Isabel Saz‐Gil, 2022. "Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 19-31, January.
    10. Junqian He & Hyosun Kim, 2021. "The Effect of Socially Responsible HRM on Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Proactive Motivation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Muhammad Arshad & Ghulam Abid & Francoise Venezia Contreras Torres, 2021. "Impact of prosocial motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating role of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 133-150, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goo Hyeok Chung & Jongwook Pak, 2021. "Is there internal fit among ability-, motivation-, and opportunity-enhancing HR practices? Evidence from South Korea," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2049-2074, October.
    2. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    3. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    5. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    6. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    7. Kaifeng Jiang & Riki Takeuchi & David P. Lepak, 2013. "Where do We Go From Here? New Perspectives on the Black Box in Strategic Human Resource Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1448-1480, December.
    8. Bruce C. Martin & Benson Honig, 2020. "Inclusive Management Research: Persons with Disabilities and Self-Employment Activity as an Exemplar," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 553-575, October.
    9. Joep P. Cornelissen & Rodolphe Durand, 2014. "Moving Forward: Developing Theoretical Contributions in Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 995-1022, September.
    10. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    11. Gregorio Sánchez-Marín & Gabriel Lozano-Reina & Mané Beglaryan, 2022. "HRM Policies and SMEs Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR Orientation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 85-110.
    12. Anastasia Stathopoulou & Tommy Kweku Quansah & George Balabanis, 2022. "The Blinding Effects of Team Identification on Sports Corruption: Cross-Cultural Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 511-529, August.
    13. Maggioni, Isabella & Sands, Sean & Kachouie, Reza & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2019. "Shopping for well-being: The role of consumer decision-making styles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 21-32.
    14. Terry R. Adler & Thomas G. Pittz & Hank B. Strevel & Dina Denney & Susan D. Steiner & Elizabeth S. Adler, 2022. "Team Over-Empowerment in Market Research: A Virtue-Based Ethics Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 159-173, February.
    15. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Shapiro, Stephen L. & Reams, Lamar & So, Kevin Kam Fung, 2019. "Is it worth the price? The role of perceived financial risk, identification, and perceived value in purchasing pay-per-view broadcasts of combat sports," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 235-246.
    17. Lazarova, Mila & Peretz, Hilla & Fried, Yitzhak, 2017. "Locals know best? Subsidiary HR autonomy and subsidiary performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 83-96.
    18. Jihyeon Oh & Dae Hee Kim & Daehwan Kim, 2023. "The Impact of Inclusive Leadership and Autocratic Leadership on Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Commitment in Sport Organizations: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust and The Moderating Role of," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Francesco Virili & Cristiano Ghiringhelli, 2021. "Uncertainty and Emerging Tensions in Organizational Change: A Grounded Theory Study on the Orchestrating Role of the Change Leader," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2271-:d:223038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.