IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1864-d217864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Human Factors and Lean Techniques on Just in Time Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua 32310, Mexico)

  • Arturo Realyvasquez-Vargas

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Technological Institute of Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California 22414, Mexico)

  • Pedro García-Alcaraz

    (Agricultural Technology Center School, Ofimatica Area, Comala, Colima 28450, Mexico)

  • Mercedes Pérez de la Parte

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Z.P. 26004 La Rioja, Spain)

  • Julio Blanco Fernández

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Z.P. 26004 La Rioja, Spain)

  • Emilio Jiménez Macias

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Z.P. 26004 La Rioja, Spain)

Abstract

A successful Just in Time (JIT) implementation is based on human resources integration (managers, operators and suppliers) and other lean manufacturing techniques applied in the production process. However, the relationship between these variables is not easily quantified. This paper reports a structural equation model that integrates variables associated with JIT implementation: management commitment, human resources integration, suppliers and production tools and technique, which affect the benefits gained, and are integrated into nine hypotheses or relationships among then. The model is evaluated with information from 352 responses to a questionnaire applied to manufacturing industry, and partial least squares technique is used to evaluate it. The direct effects, sum of indirect effects, and total effects are quantified, and a sensitivity analysis based on conditional probabilities is reported to know scenarios associated with low and high levels in variables’ execution and how they impact the benefits obtained. Findings indicate that managerial commitment is the most important variable in the JIT implementation process, since managers are the ones that determine the relationships with suppliers, integrate human resources, and approve the lean manufacturing techniques and tools that support the JIT.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Arturo Realyvasquez-Vargas & Pedro García-Alcaraz & Mercedes Pérez de la Parte & Julio Blanco Fernández & Emilio Jiménez Macias, 2019. "Effects of Human Factors and Lean Techniques on Just in Time Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1864-:d:217864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Valeria Martínez-Loya & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández, 2017. "Interrelations among SMED Stages: A Causal Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, August.
    2. Farooq, Muhammad Shoaib & Salam, Maimoona & Fayolle, Alain & Jaafar, Norizan & Ayupp, Kartinah, 2018. "Impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in Malaysia airlines: A PLS-SEM approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 169-180.
    3. Iqbal, Tahir & Huq, Faizul & Bhutta, M. Khurrum S., 2018. "Agile manufacturing relationship building with TQM, JIT, and firm performance: An exploratory study in apparel export industry of Pakistan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 24-37.
    4. Green, Kenneth W. & Inman, R.Anthony & Birou, Laura M. & Whitten, Dwayne, 2014. "Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 125-135.
    5. Monden, Yasuhiro, 2002. "The relationship between mini profit-center and JIT system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 145-154, November.
    6. Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2018. "Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 118-138.
    7. Shnaiderman, Matan & Ben-Baruch, Liron, 2016. "Control and enforcement in order to increase supplier inventory in a JIT contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 143-154.
    8. Wang, Hui & Gong, Qiguo & Wang, Shouyang, 2017. "Information processing structures and decision making delays in MRP and JIT," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 41-49.
    9. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Boon Sin, Ang & Zailani, Suhaiza & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Ramayah, T., 2015. "Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 105-117.
    11. Jean, Ruey Jer “Bryan” & Kim, Daekwan & Bello, Daniel C., 2017. "Relationship-based product innovations: Evidence from the global supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 127-140.
    12. José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Juan Carlos Sáenz Diez Muro & Julio Blanco Fernández, 2017. "The Role of Green and Traditional Supplier Attributes on Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    13. David, Israel & Eben-Chaime, Moshe, 2003. "How far should JIT vendor-buyer relationships go?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 361-368, January.
    14. Yasin, Mahmoud M. & Small, Michael H. & Wafa, Marwan A., 2003. "Organizational modifications to support JIT implementation in manufacturing and service operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 213-226, June.
    15. Johansson, Tobias, 2018. "Testing for control system interdependence with structural equation modeling: Conceptual developments and evidence on the levers of control framework," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 47-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Miorando, Rogério & Marodin, Giuliano, 2017. "Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 98-112.
    2. Kelle, Peter & Miller, Pamela A. & Akbulut, Asli Y., 2007. "Coordinating ordering/shipment policy for buyer and supplier: Numerical and empirical analysis of influencing factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 100-110, July.
    3. Ziyang Li & Qianwei Ying & Wu Yan & Chenjun Fan, 2022. "Does just‐in‐time adoption have an impact on corporate innovation: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1599-1635, April.
    4. Thanh-Lam Nguyen, 2019. "STEAM-ME: A Novel Model for Successful Kaizen Implementation and Sustainable Performance of SMEs in Vietnam," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-23, February.
    5. Anh Chi Phan & Ha Thu Nguyen & Hao Anh Nguyen & Yoshiki Matsui, 2019. "Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Bergenwall, Amy L. & Chen, Chialin & White, Richard E., 2012. "TPS's process design in American automotive plants and its effects on the triple bottom line and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 374-384.
    7. José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Nancy Liliana Ibarra Hernández & José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Julio Blanco Fernández, 2018. "Role of Information and Communication Technology in Green Supply Chain Implementation and Companies’ Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Yang, Jie & Xie, Hongming & Yu, Guangsheng & Liu, Mingyu, 2021. "Achieving a just–in–time supply chain: The role of supply chain intelligence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Rahman, Shaikh Moksadur, 2020. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(2), pages 99-108.
    10. Wang Kai, 2019. "Towards a Taxonomy of Idea Generation Techniques," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 65-80, January.
    11. Bridgelall, Raj & Stubbing, Edward, 2021. "Forecasting the effects of autonomous vehicles on land use," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Bevilacqua, Maurizio & Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele, 2018. "Human factor risk management in the process industry: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 149-159.
    13. Naveena Prakasam & Louisa Huxtable-Thomas, 2021. "Reddit: Affordances as an Enabler for Shifting Loyalties," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 723-751, June.
    14. Colin Jerolmack & Alexandra K. Murphy, 2019. "The Ethical Dilemmas and Social Scientific Trade-offs of Masking in Ethnography," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 801-827, November.
    15. Valeriy Makarov & Albert Bakhtizin, 2014. "The Estimation Of The Regions’ Efficiency Of The Russian Federation Including The Intellectual Capital, The Characteristics Of Readiness For Innovation, Level Of Well-Being, And Quality Of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 9-30.
    16. Zhao, Jing & Knoop, Victor L. & Wang, Meng, 2020. "Two-dimensional vehicular movement modelling at intersections based on optimal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-22.
    17. Kristine Edgar Danielyan & Samvel Grigoriy Chailyan, 2019. "Delineation of Effectors Impact on The Human Brain Derived Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate Synthetase-1 Activity," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 24(1), pages 17918-17926, December.
    18. Chuan Wang & Yupeng Liu & Wen Hou & Chao Yu & Guorong Wang & Yuyan Zheng, 2021. "Reliability and availability modeling of Subsea Autonomous High Integrity Pressure Protection System with partial stroke test by Dynamic Bayesian," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 268-281, April.
    19. Mohammad AL-Zoubi, 2018. "The Role of Technology, Organization, and Environment Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Success in Jordan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 48-65, August.
    20. Damgaard, Mette Trier & Nielsen, Helena Skyt, 2018. "Nudging in education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 313-342.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1864-:d:217864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.