IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1123-d207771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development Analysis of the Romanian Traditional Product Market Based on the Performance Model for Sustainable Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Silvius Stanciu

    (Center for Technology Transfer, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Monica Laura Zlati

    (Department of Accounting, Audit and Finance, Stefan cel Mare University, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Valentin Marian Antohi

    (Departament of Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University/Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Cezar Ionut Bichescu

    (Center for Technology Transfer, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

Abstract

This study aims at quantifying the degree of concentration of the traditional product market in Romania, and the sector’s productivity and the economic performance of the different categories of traditional products are assessed. This can highlight a correlation between the dynamics of traditional products and the regional development of the relevant markets in Romania. The second aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between the economic profitability of the traditional products and the sector’s sustainability. The third aim evaluates the relationship between the capital accumulations of specific companies and the evolution of their current assets. The information selected for the application was prospective (literature review, market observations, query, and data consolidation) and analytic revised (database analysis, hypothesis fixation, model conceptualization, model hypothesis testing, and conclusions to be drawn). The selected data were processed, aiming at developing a model for the sustainable development of the traditional products. The research information was collected based on the official registrations carried out between 2014 and 2018 by at the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development in Romania. During this period, Romania developed the National Traditional Product Registry (NTPR), which comprises a database of 647 traditional products. The assessment of economic performance was achieved through calculated performance test by a new proposed statistical model, named ZML. ZML suggests a market concentration analysis as an alternative to the Gini Struck method. The impact of the research consisted of an evaluation of the economic performance of traditional Romanian products in sustainable development terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvius Stanciu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Cezar Ionut Bichescu, 2019. "The Development Analysis of the Romanian Traditional Product Market Based on the Performance Model for Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1123-:d:207771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1123/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1123/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ionel BOSTAN & Aurel BURCIU & Veronica GROSU, 2010. "The Consumerism and Consumer Protection Policies in the European Community," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 4(4(545)), pages 19-34, April.
    2. Mihaela Cristina Dragoi & Jean Vasile Andrei & Mihai Mieila & Mirela Panait & Carmen Elena Dobrota & Raluca Georgiana Ladaru, 2018. "Food Safety and Security in Romania – An Econometric Analysis in the Context of National Agricultural Paradigm Transformation," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 20(47), pages 134-134, February.
    3. Gianluca Brunori & Francesca Galli & Dominique Barjolle & Rudolf Van Broekhuizen & Luca Colombo & Mario Giampietro & James Kirwan & Tim Lang & Erik Mathijs & Damian Maye & Kees De Roest & Carin Rougoo, 2016. "Are Local Food Chains More Sustainable than Global Food Chains? Considerations for Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Edi Defrancesco & Maria Angela Perito & Irene Bozzolan & Leonardo Cei & Gianluca Stefani, 2017. "Testing Consumers’ Preferences for Environmental Attributes of Pasta. Insights from an ABR Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Cristina Gabriela COSMULESE, 2017. "Countries With The Most Valuable Brands That Makes Them The Most Intangible Countries," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(12), pages 35-45, February.
    6. Boncinelli, Fabio & Contino, Caterina & Romano, Caterina & Scozzafava, Gabriele & Casini, Leonardo, 2016. "Territory, environment, and healthiness in traditional food choices: insights into consumer heterogeneity," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(1), October.
    7. Marieke Pennings & Tricia Striano & Susan Oliverio, 2014. "A picture tells a thousand words: Impact of an educational nutrition booklet on nutrition label gazing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 355-360, December.
    8. Romeo Victor Ionescu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Silvius Stanciu, 2018. "Reduced Inequalities as Factor of Sustainable Development: The Analysis Under Econometric Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Siti Nuryanah & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2015. "The Context of the Case Study," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Corporate Governance and Financial Management, chapter 5, pages 145-156, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Cezar Ionuț BICHESCU & Silvius STANCIU, 2017. "Made In Romania. Traditional Food Products," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 29-38, June.
    11. Silvius STANCIU, 2015. "How Traditional is the European Union in the Agro-food Production?," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 18-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatrice-Simona MANOLACHE & Silviu-Cristian SIMIONESCU & Mihaela PILA & Silvius STANCIU, 2023. "Labor Costs in Agriculture: Brief Analysis of the Romanian Sector," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 33-40.
    2. Andrei-Mirel Florea & Florentin Bercu & Riana Iren Radu & Silvius Stanciu, 2019. "A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of the Agricultural Cooperatives from South East Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Monica Laura Zlati & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Valentin Marian Antohi & Veronica Grosu, 2022. "Growth and integration's impact under a new dynamic approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 7057-7092, May.
    4. Vitalii ZANET & Silvius STANCIU, 2021. "Traditional Moldovan Products in the Context of European Quality Schemes. Achievements and Perspectives," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 127-133.
    5. Marian Socoliuc & Cristina-Gabriela Cosmulese & Marius-Sorin Ciubotariu & Svetlana Mihaila & Iulia-Diana Arion & Veronica Grosu, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting as a Mixture of CSR and Sustainable Development. A Model for Micro-Enterprises within the Romanian Forestry Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-34, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sawssen Khlifi & Ghazi Zouari, 2021. "The Impact of CEO Overconfidence on Real Earnings Management: Evidence from M&A Transactions," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 402-424, September.
    2. Valentin-Marian Antohi & Monica Laura Zlati & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Mihaela Neculita & Raluca Rusu & Aurelian Constantin, 2020. "Attracting European Funds in the Romanian Economy and Leverage Points for Securing their Sustainable Management: A Critical Auditing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Carmenta, Rachel & Cammelli, Federico & Dressler, Wolfram & Verbicaro, Camila & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2021. "Between a rock and a hard place: The burdens of uncontrolled fire for smallholders across the tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    5. Anne Ventura & Van‐Loc Ta & Tristan Senga Kiessé & Stéphanie Bonnet, 2021. "Design of concrete : Setting a new basis for improving both durability and environmental performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 233-247, February.
    6. Boris Rumanko & Zuzana Lušňáková & Monika Moravanská & Mária Šajbidorová, 2021. "Succession as a Risk Process in the Survival of a Family Business—Case of Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Kong, Ling & Wang, Dongbo, 2020. "Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    8. Alexandra Doernberg & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada & Dirk Wascher & Ulrich Schmutz, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 885-904, September.
    9. BOSTAN, Ionel, 2018. "If It Is The Topic Of The Research Of The Informal Economy," LawArXiv fy3g9, Center for Open Science.
    10. Barbara Cafarelli & Piermichele La Sala & Giustina Pellegrini & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2017. "Consumers? preferences investigation for extra virgin olive oil basing on conjoint analysis," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 203-218.
    11. Thomas, Alban & Lamine, Claire & Allès, Benjamin & Chiffoleau, Yuna & Doré, Antoine & Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie & Hannachi, Mourad, 2020. "The key roles of economic and social organization and producer and consumer behaviour towards a health-agriculture-food-environment nexus: recent advances and future prospects," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(1), August.
    12. Laura DIACONU (MAXIM), 2021. "The behaviour of airlines’ passengers in the context of COVID-19 pandemic," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13(2), pages 230-242, July.
    13. Monica Laura ZLATI & Cristian MIRICA, 2021. "Biological Assets Accounting In The Agricultural Sector," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 15(25), pages 1-7, February.
    14. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Andrej Kastrin & Janez Povh & Lidija Zadnik Stirn & Janez Žerovnik, 2021. "Methodologies and applications for resilient global development from the aspect of SDI-SOR special issues of CJOR," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(3), pages 773-790, September.
    16. Talis Tisenkopfs & Emils Kilis & Mikelis Grivins & Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica, 2019. "Whose ethics and for whom? Dealing with ethical disputes in agri-food governance," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 353-364, June.
    17. Ballco, Petjon & Gracia, Azucena, 2020. "Do market prices correspond with consumer demands? Combining market valuation and consumer utility for extra virgin olive oil quality attributes in a traditional producing country," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Ionel Bostan & Ionela-Corina Chersan & Magdalena Danileț & Mihaela Ifrim & Viorica Chirilă, 2020. "Investigations Regarding the Linguistic Register Used by Managers to Convey to Stakeholders a Positive View of Their Company, in the Context of the Business Sustainability Desideratum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Raymond B. Frempong & David Stadelmann, 2017. "Does Female Education have a Bargaining Effect on Household Welfare? Evidence from Ghana and Uganda," CREMA Working Paper Series 2017-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    20. Michela Floris & Angela Dettori & Cinzia Dessi, 2021. "Handling Innovation in Small Family Firms: The Role of Context," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(5), pages 1-60, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1123-:d:207771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.