IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p4865-d264624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Stochastic Optimization Approach to the Design of Shale Gas/Oil Wastewater Treatment Systems with Multiple Energy Sources under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Fadhil Y. Al-Aboosi

    (The Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3122, USA
    Department of Energy Engineering, Baghdad University, Baghdad 10071, Iraq)

  • Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi

    (The Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3122, USA)

Abstract

The production of shale gas and oil is associated with the generation of substantial amounts of wastewater. With the growing emphasis on sustainable development, the energy sector has been intensifying efforts to manage water resources while diversifying the energy portfolio used in treating wastewater to include fossil and renewable energy. The nexus of water and energy introduces complexity in the optimization of the water management systems. Furthermore, the uncertainty in the data for energy (e.g., solar intensity) and cost (e.g., price fluctuation) introduce additional complexities. The objective of this work is to develop a novel framework for the optimizing wastewater treatment and water-management systems in shale gas production while incorporating fossil and solar energy and accounting for uncertainties. Solar energy is utilized via collection, recovery, storage, and dispatch of heat. Heat integration with an adjacent industrial facility is considered. Additionally, electric power production is intended to supply a reverse osmosis (RO) plant and the local electric grid. The optimization problem is formulated as a multi-scenario mixed integer non-linear programming (MINLP) problem that is a deterministic equivalent of a two-stage stochastic programming model for handling uncertainty in operational conditions through a finite set of scenarios. The results show the capability of the system to address water-energy nexus problems in shale gas production based on the system’s economic and environmental merits. A case study for Eagle Ford Basin in Texas is solved by enabling effective water treatment and energy management strategies to attain the maximum annual profit of the entire system while achieving minimum environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadhil Y. Al-Aboosi & Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi, 2019. "A Stochastic Optimization Approach to the Design of Shale Gas/Oil Wastewater Treatment Systems with Multiple Energy Sources under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-39, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4865-:d:264624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. A. Brown & Mine K. Yucel, 2008. "What Drives Natural Gas Prices?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 45-60.
    2. Mirkhani, Sh. & Saboohi, Y., 2012. "Stochastic modeling of the energy supply system with uncertain fuel price – A case of emerging technologies for distributed power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 668-674.
    3. Carpaneto, Enrico & Chicco, Gianfranco & Mancarella, Pierluigi & Russo, Angela, 2011. "Cogeneration planning under uncertainty: Part I: Multiple time frame approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1059-1067, April.
    4. Robert K. Hammond & J. Eric Bickel, 2013. "Reexamining Discrete Approximations to Continuous Distributions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 6-25, March.
    5. Sun, Li & Gai, Limei & Smith, Robin, 2017. "Site utility system optimization with operation adjustment under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 450-456.
    6. Allen C. Miller, III & Thomas R. Rice, 1983. "Discrete Approximations of Probability Distributions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 352-362, March.
    7. El-Halwagi, Mahmoud & Harell, Dustin & Dennis Spriggs, H., 2009. "Targeting cogeneration and waste utilization through process integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 880-887, June.
    8. Carpaneto, Enrico & Chicco, Gianfranco & Mancarella, Pierluigi & Russo, Angela, 2011. "Cogeneration planning under uncertainty. Part II: Decision theory-based assessment of planning alternatives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1075-1083, April.
    9. Ioannou, Anastasia & Fuzuli, Gulistiani & Brennan, Feargal & Yudha, Satya Widya & Angus, Andrew, 2019. "Multi-stage stochastic optimization framework for power generation system planning integrating hybrid uncertainty modelling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 760-776.
    10. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "Design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty: A two-stage stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 932-950.
    11. Oke, Doris & Mukherjee, Rajib & Sengupta, Debalina & Majozi, Thokozani & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M., 2019. "Optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas exploration: From production to transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 651-669.
    12. Shafiee, Shahriar & Topal, Erkan, 2010. "A long-term view of worldwide fossil fuel prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 988-1000, March.
    13. Donald L. Keefer & Samuel E. Bodily, 1983. "Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 595-609, May.
    14. Jorge Chebeir & Aryan Geraili & Jose Romagnoli, 2017. "Development of Shale Gas Supply Chain Network under Market Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, February.
    15. Herrmann, Ulf & Kelly, Bruce & Price, Henry, 2004. "Two-tank molten salt storage for parabolic trough solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 883-893.
    16. Khatami, Maryam & Mahootchi, Masoud & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2015. "Benders’ decomposition for concurrent redesign of forward and closed-loop supply chain network with demand and return uncertainties," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-21.
    17. Woodruff, Joshua & Dimitrov, Nedialko B., 2018. "Optimal discretization for decision analysis," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 288-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Casandra Okogwu & Mercy Odochi Agho & Mojisola Abimbola Adeyinka & Bukola A. Odulaja & Obinna Arize Ufoaro & Sodrudeen Abolore Ayodeji & Chibuike Daraojimba, 2023. "Adapting To Oil Price Volatility: A Strategic Review Of Supply Chain Responses Over Two Decades," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(10), pages 68-87, October.
    2. Oke, Doris & Mukherjee, Rajib & Sengupta, Debalina & Majozi, Thokozani & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud, 2020. "On the optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas network under price uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jiyuan & Tang, Hailong & Chen, Min, 2019. "Linear substitute model-based uncertainty analysis of complicated non-linear energy system performance (case study of an adaptive cycle engine)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 87-108.
    2. Woodruff, Joshua & Dimitrov, Nedialko B., 2018. "Optimal discretization for decision analysis," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 288-305.
    3. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Cotton, James S. & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2020. "Urban community energy systems design under uncertainty for specified levels of carbon dioxide emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Konstantin Pavlikov & Stan Uryasev, 2018. "CVaR distance between univariate probability distributions and approximation problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 67-88, March.
    5. Jorge Chebeir & Aryan Geraili & Jose Romagnoli, 2017. "Development of Shale Gas Supply Chain Network under Market Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, February.
    6. Sun, Li & Gai, Limei & Smith, Robin, 2017. "Site utility system optimization with operation adjustment under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 450-456.
    7. Luo, Xianglong & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2013. "Operational planning optimization of steam power plants considering equipment failure in petrochemical complex," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1247-1264.
    8. Sahoo, Nihar R. & Mohapatra, Pratap K.J. & Mahanty, Biswajit, 2017. "Compliance choice analysis for India's thermal power sector in the market-based energy efficiency regime," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 624-633.
    9. Karl Friedrich Mina & Gerald H. L. Cheang & Carl Chiarella, 2015. "Approximate Hedging Of Options Under Jump-Diffusion Processes," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-26.
    10. Thomas W. Keelin & Bradford W. Powley, 2011. "Quantile-Parameterized Distributions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 206-219, September.
    11. Tanaka, Ken'ichiro & Toda, Alexis Akira, 2015. "Discretizing Distributions with Exact Moments: Error Estimate and Convergence Analysis," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt7g23r5kh, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    12. Schachter, Jonathan A. & Mancarella, Pierluigi & Moriarty, John & Shaw, Rita, 2016. "Flexible investment under uncertainty in smart distribution networks with demand side response: Assessment framework and practical implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 439-449.
    13. Robert K. Hammond & J. Eric Bickel, 2013. "Reexamining Discrete Approximations to Continuous Distributions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 6-25, March.
    14. Yijing Li & Prakash P. Shenoy, 2012. "A Framework for Solving Hybrid Influence Diagrams Containing Deterministic Conditional Distributions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 55-75, March.
    15. Capuder, Tomislav & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2014. "Techno-economic and environmental modelling and optimization of flexible distributed multi-generation options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 516-533.
    16. Ravi Kashyap, 2016. "The Perfect Marriage and Much More: Combining Dimension Reduction, Distance Measures and Covariance," Papers 1603.09060, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    17. Kashyap, Ravi, 2019. "The perfect marriage and much more: Combining dimension reduction, distance measures and covariance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).
    18. Oke, Doris & Mukherjee, Rajib & Sengupta, Debalina & Majozi, Thokozani & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud, 2020. "On the optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas network under price uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Thilo N. H. Albers & Felix Kersting & Timo Stieglitz, 2023. "Industrialization, Returns, Inequality," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 462, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    20. Ersoz, Ibrahim & Colak, Uner, 2016. "Combined cooling, heat and power planning under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1016-1025.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4865-:d:264624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.